Cricket

Amla and Kallis have been brilliant again. Kallis is obviously a legend, but Amla has been very impressive in both forms of the game the past 12 months.

Chris Gayle hit a double century on day 1 of the Windies test against Sri Lanka. When the guy is on form, no-one hits a cricket ball better than Gayle.
 
Poor advertisement for test match cricket in the sub-continent today.

While credit should go to McCullum and Gayle for their innings, but the pitches need to be more bowler friendly to make a test match exciting.

Pitches in Sri Lanka are the worse in the world though, they are always flat.
 
Poor advertisement for test match cricket in the sub-continent today.

While credit should go to McCullum and Gayle for their innings, but the pitches need to be more bowler friendly to make a test match exciting.

Pitches in Sri Lanka are the worse in the world though, they are always flat.

Agree with that, KM. Hopefully Nagpur will produce a result wicket.

Did you see any of the NZ/Ind game? I was in NZ last year and saw a lot of Williamson in domestic cricket where he was cleaning up as a 19yo. He is going to be NZ's best batsman since Martin Crowe. Excellent technique and temperament.
 
Great to see Amla performing so consistently. Another hundred notched up. He's our next Kallis. Jacques himself is a great. Only third behind Tendulkar and Ponting in terms of hundreds (36) and half of them have been on away tours. Impressive.

Who's after Amla, Stretch? David Miller? Will he make it?
 
Possibly. I don't think our bowling is that all that special to be honest. Then again you can say that about every team around.

Yep. Both batting and bowling averages are rising.

Wickets like Ahmedabad and Hyderabad don't help, mind.
 
Agree with that, KM. Hopefully Nagpur will produce a result wicket.

Did you see any of the NZ/Ind game? I was in NZ last year and saw a lot of Williamson in domestic cricket where he was cleaning up as a 19yo. He is going to be NZ's best batsman since Martin Crowe. Excellent technique and temperament.

I saw most of the match today, although since it was clear from yesterday's last session that the match is going to be a draw, couldn't be bothered to watch it today.

Agreed about Willamson he looks like a great talent, although the pitches here are hardly testing but he has a good technique.

Hopefully the match at Nagpur is gonna be exciting though, although considering the pitches we've got here, I'm not holding my breath over it.

Anyone watching the Pak-SA Match, Pakistan need 167 runs over from 29 overs and have 7 wickets left(it's a test match)..will be interesting to see if Pakistan have a go at it.
 
156 from 26 overs. Pakistan should have a go. 7 wickets in hand.

Used to get Ten Cricket till a couple of weeks ago, but now it looks like they've made it a pay channel.. so no signal.
 
Umar Akmal next man in, too, who is good at scoring fast.. might be a problem if he has some money riding on this, though. Never know with the Akmal brothers
 
Umar Akmal next man in, too, who is good at scoring fast.. might be a problem if he has some money riding on this, though. Never know with the Akmal brothers

:lol:

Great effort by Younis, thankfully the PCB put behind any differences and recalled him for the SA series, and he has done quite well. 156 from 25 overs and 7 wickets in hand, will they have the guts to play aggressive cricket knowing a couple of wickets and SA will have a chance of winning themselves - that is the beauty of Test cricket.
 
Harris on, that'll be a draw then.. very negative bowler.
 
What the feck?

Both the captains have decided to call off the match, I can understand it from SA's perspective but really 100 odd runs from 14 overs with 7 wickets to left was a very winnable task.
 
Bizarre. I imagine Smith was ecstatic when they offered the draw.
 
Who's after Amla, Stretch? David Miller? Will he make it?

I'm not sure I get your first question mate. If you mean in terms of the batting for the future it is certainly not Miller for test cricket. Miller and Ingram are exciting in terms of ODI's and T20 cricket. Duminy, De Villiers, Petersen along with Amla will be the cornerstone of South Africa's batting line up for years to come.
 
What the feck?

Both the captains have decided to call off the match, I can understand it from SA's perspective but really 100 odd runs from 14 overs with 7 wickets to left was a very winnable task.

Bizarre. I imagine Smith was ecstatic when they offered the draw.

Smith was definitely counting his lucky stars. The feck was Pakistan thinking? The match was there for the taking on a flat batting track.
 
Another day, another century for Kallis. What a great player he has been, a true legend. AB de Villiers also hit a century.
 
AB magnificent again today. For me the best all format player in the world, when you consider his keeping in the shorter stuff allied to his batting.
 
AB magnificent again today. For me the best all format player in the world, when you consider his keeping in the shorter stuff allied to his batting.

Sachin, Sehwag might have something to say about that. Shane Watson as well.
 
Great win for Bangladesh. I'd fancy Zimbabwe to take them, though.. seen a bit of this Zimbabwe team, they look quite impressive for a side that hasn't played much cricket against proper opposition.

They're a good ODI side Zimbabwe. They've got a number of talented ODI batsmen as well as some very miserly slow bowlers.

I'd be annoyed if we dropped more than one game against them at home though.

Zimbabwe win the first ODI..
 
Complacent batting...bowling was good, kept them to 209, but terrible batting chasing that total.

Thump NZ in a whitewash, but then lose to Zimbabwe at home.

There is a reason for our loss though...Ashraful, or ashrafcuk has he is known to local fans is back in the side.
 
India in South Africa 2010-11

No UDRS in South Africa-India Tests
Firdose Moonda
November 30, 2010


The Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS) will not be a part of India's upcoming Test tour of South Africa. Gerald Majola, chief executive of Cricket South Africa confirmed the news to ESPNcricinfo saying, "[We] will definitely not be using it."

Majola who was in Dubai for the ICC Chief Executives Conference did not explain what had led to the decision but a CSA official said the main reason was, "India are not keen to use it".

Corrie van Zyl, the South Africa coach, said his team had been expecting this development, given India's stance on the issue. South Africa have used the UDRS in other home series, most recently against England in 2009-10. "We are not going to use it and thats the end of it," he said. "I like UDRS and it does eradicate a lot of decisions that are wrong, which can only be good for the game.

"I'm not disappointed, I almost knew it was not going to happen in any case, so it's not a major disappointment, and it will still be a very good series without it."

Graeme Smith, the South Africa captain, had said in October that the UDRS needed to be implemented consistently and that technology was the way forward in cricket. "I think if the UDRS is going to be successful it needs to be implemented properly by the ICC and not on a 50-50 basis like we have seen so far," he had said. "It must be used all of the time and not for selective series' like we see now."

Smith's team-mate AB de Villiers has also come out in support of the UDRS. "I'd love to see the referral system used," he said. "It's necessary to get some of the really poor decisions out of the game. It frustrates everyone. I've spoken to some umpires, who also back the system and really want it in place. It's something that we all have to get used to, and it's taken us a while to get used to it. I'd like to see it being used in all cricket."

India have played a series in which the UDRS was used only once - in Sri Lanka in 2008. They struggled with their referrals on that tour, getting only one review right, while Sri Lanka successfully challenged 11 decisions. Since then the UDRS has been used in Australia, South Africa, England, New Zealand and West Indies and has found favour with several captains and players. The Indians and the BCCI, however, are firmly opposed to the system, even though the ICC have approved its use in principle during the 2011 World Cup.

MS Dhoni, the India captain, reiterated his reluctance to accept the system during the recent home series against New Zealand, calling for the standard of on-field umpiring to be improved instead.

Really is a crap stance by India, so because they couldn't figure out how to use the system properly, and SL used it to overturn incorrect decisions(lbw decisions mainly against the spinners) they've decided they will now resist this as much as they can....

UDRS is not perfect, but it is a million times better than not having it. If it helps to overturn even 1 wrong decision every test match, it is worth it.
 
Really is a crap stance by India, so because they couldn't figure out how to use the system properly, and SL used it to overturn incorrect decisions(lbw decisions mainly against the spinners) they've decided they will now resist this as much as they can....

UDRS is not perfect, but it is a million times better than not having it. If it helps to overturn even 1 wrong decision every test match, it is worth it.

Yea, agreed. The stance taken by the senior Indian players(Sachin and Dhoni in particular) is idiotic. It's like a technophobe bashing a piece of technology without even trying it out. Sehwag and Dravid are for it and Sehwag speaks out quite frequently saying he'd like it implemented.
 
Yea, agreed. The stance taken by the senior Indian players(Sachin and Dhoni in particular) is idiotic. It's like a technophobe bashing a piece of technology without even trying it out. Sehwag and Dravid are for it and Sehwag speaks out quite frequently saying he'd like it implemented.

Don't mind him at all...quite brash, and honest. I like that. He said a new not very flattering things about Bangladesh at a press conference and some tried to make a big deal out of it.

I had a big laugh...because everything he said was true, but because he wasn't being 'nice' everyone thought he was a bastard. My cousins, "Of course you think he's right BTV, you're a freaking foreigner, what do you know about pride for your motherland :lol::lol::lol: )

The ICC are fools...simply make it compulsory for all tests to start with, and then see how we go with the other formats.
 
They can't make it compulsory till BCCI accept it. ICC's just the BCCI's puppet, unfortunately.
 
Series back at 1-1

Razzak with a hat-trick, and 5/20 overall. Shakib with 4, and a good innings with the bat again.

But the most important thing was, he's stamped his authority on this team, and basically said, I no longer want Ashrafcuk in my team.

This was him post match 1.

Shakib hinted that he was saddled with a XI that he did not completely agree with. "The captain should have a clearly defined role, but anyway I don't want to talk about the team. What I can say is that I gave my 100 % as a captain in the field.

"Fielding-wise we could not expect more from this team because we had two good fielders in Raqibul Hasan and Naeem Islam out of the team. Those who were in the team are not capable. Actually we can't expect more from this team as they did what they are capable of."

Raqibul played in the New Zealand series, but made way for Mohammad Ashraful who was given yet another opportunity to revive his flagging international career. Ashraful was a part of the batting failure in Mirpur, a recurring problem that Shakib felt had bogged the team down even in the New Zealand series.

"Ordinary batting was the main reason [for the defeat]. The simple thing is we didn't bat well though the wicket was really good for batting in the second innings. In the end, one can lose the match but the fact was that we played poor cricket today.

"We didn't bat well against New Zealand too and it's really worrying that we have batted badly five matches in a row. We will lose more matches if we play like this."


start of match 2, ashrafcuk gone from the team....hehehe.
 
What an innings from Yusuf :D

India chase down the 315 target vs the Kiwis with an over to spare.
 
Razzak needs 3 wickets to break the record for most wickets in a five match series
 
Good win for Pakistan against New Zealand, the batting was impressive for once and we managed to bowl them out for 110 in the second innings.

Welcome victory with all the off-field shit going on.
 
Makhaya Ntini's last hurrah

Makaya Ntini, the first black South African to play cricket for South Africa, has retired as a genuine national hero
Makhaya-Ntini-007.jpg


Four overs, no maidens, no wickets, 46 runs. They are a sorry looking set of figures. Given that it was a Twenty20 match and India won by 21 runs you could even say they cost the match, especially as the second of those overs went for 20, and was the most expensive bowled all day. But then Makhaya Ntini was always about more than just the numbers. There was only one that ever really mattered: one. Ntini was the first black South African to play cricket for South Africa. After 90 years of segregation and discrimination, he was the first man across the Rubicon.

In his final press conference Ntini said that while he would have liked to have beaten Shaun Pollock's record for most Test wickets by a South African, his favourite moment of his career was his first match. 101 and 390 – the number of Test matches he played and wickets he took – well, those were just more numbers. "For each and every cricketer, if you want to play for your country, the first highlight is getting the cap, the green-and-gold cap. That for me stands out. Whatever I might have achieved after that, my aim was to wear that green-and-gold cap."

If you're looking for a statistic from his final international appearance that tells you something about his contribution to South African cricket you need to scan the small print at the bottom of the scorecard where they tell you the attendance. The crowd at the Moses Mabhida Stadium was the largest ever to gather to watch a cricket match in Africa. It was 47,000 strong, and yet none of them cared a great deal about the result. It was almost an exhibition game, staged in a stadium built for the World Cup and sold as both a tribute to Sachin Tendulkar and a celebration of 150years of Indian immigration to South Africa. But most were there to cheer Ntini, a pioneer whose achievements mean as much to his own people as Tendulkar's do to his. Ntini has been around so long, and become such a fixture of international sport, that it is easy to forget his roots. Not that he has ever been guilty of doing that.

Ntini's penultimate delivery was slapped over mid-wicket for six by Suresh Raina, an insulting smear-slog of a shot. As ever, Ntini turned and ran back to his mark. Never mind the runs conceded, the crowd rose to their feet and roared him in to the crease, falling silent only as he leapt into that quirky, kinked, delivery stride of his. That sideways movement is ingrained into his action, a relic of his schoolboy days when the new set of spikes he was given by his first coach would cause sparks to fly as his feet pounded down on the concrete wickets in King William's Town.

That was two decades ago. Not long beforehand Ntini had been earning his keep as a goat herd in the village of Mdingi, keeping his feet warm on the cold nights, he says, by standing in cow pats. In Ntini's village cricket you got a four if you hit a pig and a six if you struck a goat, or so the story goes. He never was much of a batsman. In 337 first class and Test innings he has never scored more than 34. But the 20-mile-round run from Mdingi into King William's Town built up reserves of stamina that would see him through 12years as a fast bowler. He was still sprinting in last Sunday, even if his bowling itself has lost all its snap, crackle and pop, his mph pace well down in the 70s.

He was first picked to play for South Africa in 1998. He was 19, and when he was told he had been selected he incredulously asked "Is this a joke? I don't believe you." Plenty of other people, with attitudes hungover from the apartheid era, felt the same thing. Almost exactly a year later he was charged with rape. His dream story took a nightmare twist.

He was innocent, and was acquitted on appeal. After 20 months out he came back into the team in 2000. Over the course of the last decade he has made himself a genuine national hero, and one worthy of the name — unlike a couple of others the Proteas have produced since they returned to international cricket. He is one of the most popular players in the sport. And for a time too, around 2006, he was one of the very best fast bowlers in the world. But we should cut short the hagiography there. "I don't want to be remembered as a person who did A, B, C, D," he said last week. "All I want to be remembered as is Makhaya Ntini, who played for South Africa. A guy who always cheered the boys up."

After he had finished his final innings – an undefeated one – he leapt on the back of a golf buggy and took a lap around the ground, waving to the rapturous crowd. He stopped to make a short speech to the crowd – "I would like to take this opportunity to say to each and every one of you, thank you, thank you, thank you for all your support" – in which, as he promised, he did not shed a tear ("Crying?" he had scoffed in his pre-match press conference. "I am not a baby.") And then he disappeared down the tunnel one last time in a blaze of ticker tape. In retirement he plans to start a cricket academy near Mdingi. Whatever lessons he passes on, none will be as important as the one he has been hammering home for the last ten years – that the colour of your skin has nothing to do with it.

Always was a character.. I remember a particularly fierce battle between him and Flintoff, a relentless barrage of bouncers which Flintoff wasn't scared to hook for six.
 
Vettori gets his 100. A very underrated player imo, over 4000 runs and 300 wickets in Tests, played very well against Pakistan and a very important innings.
 
Ponting has stepped down as captain in all forms of the game. Although he has not retired from international cricket it might be the end of the road for him as the Aussies might look to the future instead.

Great player and decent captain who had the misfortune of seeing so many great players retire around the same time as each other and no-one else step up to replace them. If he was to never play again it would be a shame, but at least he went out with a century.
 
Good captain, still think he wasnt as great a captain as he is sometimes projected to be, benefitted largely by having one of the best teams around him during his peak.

Great batsman though, no doubt about it, I think he will continue for a while and see how it pans out, if it continues on the same path then he might call it day soon.
 
Ponting has stepped down as captain in all forms of the game. Although he has not retired from international cricket it might be the end of the road for him as the Aussies might look to the future instead.

Great player and decent captain who had the misfortune of seeing so many great players retire around the same time as each other and no-one else step up to replace them. If he was to never play again it would be a shame, but at least he went out with a century.
To be fair, he had the FORTUNE of captaining one of the greatest teams cricket has ever seen.