Skizzo
Full Member
Kyle mills - why?
Because I don’t watch cricket and don’t have time to research too much. Any more questions?
Kyle mills - why?
Because I don’t watch cricket and don’t have time to research too much. Any more questions?
I know his stats look good in this context but he's quite shit
I know his stats look good in this context but he's quite shit
He is quite shit but surely his stats in this context is all that matters? If player x is completely useless but had great performances in the World Cup, surely he is better pick than someone who is great outside the World Cup but didn’t really perform in the World Cup?
There is a reason why Lara was picked quite late in the draft
When somebody looks at this thread and is a casual.. Kyle mills stats won't matter.. sad but true..
When somebody looks at this thread and is a casual.. Kyle mills stats won't matter.. sad but true..
That just highlights the point that specific drafts are pointless then.
Yeah, I think if there are many scan voters then these kinds of drafts don't work. Well, we'll see.That just highlights the point that specific drafts are pointless then.
Yep, that is a genuine problem. Not sure how the footy drafts handle this though, especially when they have those Serie A Peak players like drafts.Yeah, I think if there are many scan voters then these kinds of drafts don't work. Well, we'll see.
Yeah.. In specific drafts like this, it’s important to have some good discussion and highlight players performances
Have you seen those threads? It's hardcore stuff. Casual scan voters are identified and shot.Yep, that is a genuine problem. Not sure how the footy drafts handle this though, especially when they have those Serie A Peak players like drafts.
I will keep in mind to vote based on my whim in those threads going forward. Thanks for the heads up.Have you seen those threads? It's hardcore stuff. Casual scan voters are identified and shot.
Does that mean, their votes are not counted ?Have you seen those threads? It's hardcore stuff. Casual scan voters are identified and shot.
They are counted but good luck just voting and fecking off without at least mentioning why.Does that mean, their votes are not counted ?
I will keep in mind to vote based on my whim in those threads going forward. Thanks for the heads up.
When you vote in a general election you don't put a cross in the box then write your reasons underneath!
I usually look at the 2 teams, weigh up who I think would win if they played each other and vote for them. My reason would be the same every time i.e. 'I think they are the stronger team and would win in that match situation'!
If I'm not wrong his 8hrs pick time had passed by now ?
If I'm not wrong his 8hrs pick time had passed by now ?
If I'm not wrong his 8hrs pick time had passed by now ?
Yep, that is a genuine problem. Not sure how the footy drafts handle this though, especially when they have those Serie A Peak players like drafts.
That's not usually the case for the cricket drafts. Most people don't explain why they voted for one team over the other. If you go through the history of the cricket drafts, most match ups don't reach page 3, but you will see around 20-25 votes for the same.The thread opening post has clear a clear message saying only Serie A performances are counted. In addition, because there is so much discussion and number of voters are significantly higher than here, the impact of scan voters is limited