Can't we have two matches on a day and matches on weekends?
Matches on weekends generally result in low voting so I don't want to be unfair to anyone. I will tweak the fixture list to have two matches on some days.
Can't we have two matches on a day and matches on weekends?
I hope every one who was playing/assisting votes in the games as I doubt we'd have much, if any, input from outside that group.
Sorry guys...can't play tomorrow or wednesday. Very busy days at work. Can someone swap with me and Donaldo? Any days particularly bad for you Donaldo?
I will ask Aldo , ghali if they can do tomorrow or akash.
Varun and I picked Murali in round 2 because there was a 1/2 probability of playing on a spin friendly track, as outlined in the first post. Why are the rules changed now?
Varun and I picked Murali in round 2 because there was a 1/2 probability of playing on a spin friendly track, as outlined in the first post. Why are the rules changed now?
Murali could turn the ball on concrete. Don't think Varun needs to worry.
Both Warne and McGrath have more wickets on SCG than MCG so I'm good anyway.
Whoa wait. We're going to have ground wise arguments? I thought stadium names were just indicative of pitch conditions
Sydney favours slower bowlers IIRC. Keep it Lords, Gabba and Wellington. I'm sure Lillee will agree.
Yep, we planned according to the list of stadiums given in which 4 were spin friendly.
Varun and I picked Murali in round 2 because there was a 1/2 probability of playing on a spin friendly track, as outlined in the first post. Why are the rules changed now?
ESPN cricinfo says
From the early 1970s though, the square's character has undergone a number of revisions. Principally, it has come to be seen as a spinner's paradise - never more clearly than in memorable Australian Test wins over West Indies in 1984-85 (when Bob Holland and Murray Bennett piloted the home team to a crushing success) and in 1988-89 (when the left arm orthodox spin of Allan Border claimed an unlikely 11 scalps). Of course, this is not to say that the limelight has been stolen purely by slow bowlers; West Indian Brian Lara's masterful 277 in 1992-93 and paceman Fanie De Villiers' match haul of 10 for 123 at the forefront of South Africa's amazing five run win in 1993-94 underlining the point.
Yup, that sounds fine to me, but let's clear it with everyone.
However, I'd be in favour of a randomizer.
Am not sure people will have the patience to envisage results in 3 different venues.
Think a randomizer for the venue is uncomplicated and straightforward.
Ok we need a vote on this -
If enough people object to random venue change to this rule -
1) The voters would be asked to choose a team that will prevail over a three match series on these respective grounds.
The managers in their tactics can specify as to which player will be dropped for which match.
- Eden Gardens, Kolkatta
- Lords, London
- SCG, Sydney
Then, we will go back to the original rule of a randomizer deciding the venue of all matches.
Btw, under Xenforo anyone can make a poll. So i'm not needed in that case.
Wait. What? You had a problem with MCG. And now you're saying random is fine
I meant we use a randomizer to pick 1 venue out of 8 originally listed by crappy, for each match.
So I've been playing this game on the iphone called stick cricket. Absurdly simple and very addictive. Anyway, one of the main ways to play is an Allstar team that aims for world domination and takes on one country after another. So here's the allstar team they give you
Gavaskar
Jayasuriya
Ponting
Lara
Botham
Gilchrist
Imran
Tufnell
Qadir
Ambrose
McGrath
Spot the odd one out.
Stick cricket is awesome. That is all.