he's proven more and been better and has more experience than PIG or Foster. I seriously doubt you are in a position to judge Gordon as a keeper at all. If you think Foster and PIG are better you clearly have no clue. A peak VDS at this stage is better of course but i dont see VDS as that good anymore.
When has Gordon proven himself to be better than either? Whilst playing for Sunderland? Both PIG and foster have shown themselves to be very good keepers on occasion just like Gordon and for me would look better than him if playing for sunderland, I don't know what you can possibly have seen in craig Gordon to convince you that he is the next big thing.
He is a good keeper and no more than that at this point. Foster looked just as good playing for a weaker side than Sunderland at Watford and PIG looked a good keeper at WBA before being relegated.
Also you you seem to be confusing yourself, you seem to admit that VDS is currently better than Gordon and then you go on to say that you don't think VDS is good anymore. If thats the case then what does that say about Gordon by comparison? VDS is still among the top 4 best keepers in the prem whilst Gordon simply does not look upto that standard.
Gordon has another 8-10 years and as a keeper isnt at his prime. He'll be a great keeper for a great side. Not united if the fans have any say but he'll prove himself eventually.
You think he's shit, clearly he's not. It's one thing to say he's not good enough for United and another to say he's shit and not as good as two keepers whohave made fools of themselves an awful lot whilst in goal for United.
Could you show me where I have said in any of my posts that Gordon is shit?
I have simply said that despite being a good keeper he is no better than what we have in reserve and he is has not shown the kind of mental capacity to be able to handle the no1 spot at OT. Thats just a fact, however he is just to repeat myself a good keeper.
Also you must not have watched Foster and PIG play many games if you think that they have embarrised themselves in the no1 spot here. Both have shown on occasions the ability to be very able no1's, the key however is consistancy and having the concentration to produce key saves at key moments. Both of them lack this and I have seen nothing to suggest that Gordon has it either.
Anyway this is pointless. He'll prove himself eventually, i have a lot of confidence in Gordon based on seeing him on many many occasions. He didnt cost £9million for nothing and you can continue to disregard him all you like. Time will tell and i'll be backing him.
Why has the fact that he cost 9mil at a Sunderland side with more money than sense got anything to do with his current level of ability? Yes he is good but not exceptional by any stretch of the imagination. The fee reflects sunderland's well know wealth and Vladimir Romanov reluctance to sell, nothing more than that.
You yourself seem to lack understanding of the mental side of goalkeeping and why somebody like Gordon might look great at Sunderland where he has to make 10 or more saves per game and at a club like united where he may be largely redundant for upto 45+ mins and then be required to make a key save with very little preparation.
Thats part of what separates a VDS from a keeper like Gordon and until he shows more than he currently has I see no signs that he could come here and be No1.