I think that kind of misses the point of the argument though - should Arsenal have been awarded the points against Newcastle in Feb 2011 had the game been abandoned after 60 minutes? (4-0 to Arsenal at the time - nobody in the history of the PL had ever or has ever since avoided defeat after going 0-4 down)
Let's say the 2nd leg of the Barcelona-PSG game or the Liverpool-Barcelona game couldn't be played for whatever reason. Would it have been right to just assume PSG and Barcelona would have qualified?
The beauty of football is that it's not over until it's over. You can't arbitrarily award points or wins until the game or season is complete. As other posters have pointed out, where do you draw the line? If Liverpool had been 15pts clear before the suspension, would that have been enough? How about 10? How about 6?
If Liverpool had mathematically won the title that would have opened up a different argument about whether they could be crowned Champions without any relegations. As it stands, the title wasn't mathematically won, a freak event has occurred which NOBODY foresaw and unfortunately for them, the ONLY way this can play out (unless we want to put next season at risk as well) is to finish the season and declare it void
Couldn't agree more.
Mathematically, and this is all about the statistics, Liverpool have won nothing.
If the season cannot be completed, that's the way it stays.