Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
May be better to create a thread somewhere else to debate about these questions. I think we should keep this thread for updates or football related news and debate. State , non-state, monaco , qatar should not be discussed here.
Just my opinion.

This is the thread to debate opinions. If you want no debate, check out the Tweets only thread.
 
Last edited:
You tell yourself that. There will be no difference in the eyes of many, however you spin it - myself potentially included. No club should be backed by a fecking State, or never have to feasibly watch their finances. Even the biggest clubs in the World should have to loan a Wout Weghorst in the winter if they’ve spent too much in the summer. Otherwise what’s the point in sport? Just fodder for teenage tweeters and FIFA shut ins? United have always had the moral high ground in these arguments. We’ve always been a ‘proper club’ …but so many are happy to piss it all away for a sugar daddy. When as you say, we don’t actually even need it!

Deep down that’s why a lot of fans are desperate to make these little get out clause excuses or play on the technicalities… because reminding them of how others will consider it all completely hollow does rankle - even if it’s just a little. And so it should. And If all naysayers like me can do is remind them of that, then fine.. I’ll take what I can get at this point.

‘Cos I want rid of the Glazers too, I have no power or influence on anything and I am completely resigned this happening… but I’ll be fecked if I’m lifting up my legs and lubing your collective conscience as well. I’d rather be a party pooper than a hypocrite.

I wish I could have put it as eloquently as this, but this sums up my feelings exactly, great post.
 
You tell yourself that. There will be no difference in the eyes of many, however you spin it - myself potentially included. No club should be backed by a fecking State, or never have to feasibly watch their finances. Even the biggest clubs in the World should have to loan a Wout Weghorst in the winter if they’ve spent too much in the summer. Otherwise what’s the point in sport? Just fodder for teenage tweeters and FIFA shut ins? United have always had the moral high ground in these arguments. We’ve always been a ‘proper club’ …but so many are happy to piss it all away for a sugar daddy. When as you say, we don’t actually even need it!

Deep down that’s why a lot of fans are desperate to make these little get out clause excuses or play on the technicalities… because reminding them of how others will consider it all completely hollow does rankle - even if it’s just a little. And so it should. And If all naysayers like me can do is remind them of that, then fine.. I’ll take what I can get at this point.

‘Cos I want rid of the Glazers too, I have no power or influence on anything and I am completely resigned this happening… but I’ll be fecked if I’m lifting up my legs and lubing your collective conscience as well. I’d rather be a party pooper than a hypocrite.
Yeah this, very well said.
 
That's the standard at the moment. If he's worth 2 or 3 then where is it coming from ? Never mind the fact that its not him, but rather son that is allegedly attempting to "buy Man United outright". Where is his son getting the money from, if not from some degree of state backing ?

Family money plus probably some backing from the financial institutions he's connected to - really not that complicated at all
 
Everyone just needs to be nice to each other and accept it’s going to be Qatar.

It’s either going to be exciting or turn to shit. Whatever it is, it’ll be interesting.

Not so certain at all. It's anyone's game, so to speak.
 
You tell yourself that. There will be no difference in the eyes of many, however you spin it - myself potentially included. No club should be backed by a fecking State, or never have to feasibly watch their finances. Even the biggest clubs in the World should have to loan a Wout Weghorst in the winter if they’ve spent too much in the summer. Otherwise what’s the point in sport? Just fodder for teenage tweeters and FIFA shut ins? United have always had the moral high ground in these arguments. We’ve always been a ‘proper club’ …but so many are happy to piss it all away for a sugar daddy. When as you say, we don’t actually even need it!

Deep down that’s why a lot of fans are desperate to make these little get out clause excuses or play on the technicalities… because reminding them of how others will consider it all completely hollow does rankle - even if it’s just a little. And so it should. And If all naysayers like me can do is remind them of that, then fine.. I’ll take what I can get at this point.

‘Cos I want rid of the Glazers too, I have no power or influence on anything and I am completely resigned this happening… but I’ll be fecked if I’m lifting up my legs and lubing your collective conscience as well. I’d rather be a party pooper than a hypocrite.


Wow.

You’ve nailed it. Incredible post.
 
Really? The one guy who hasn't been pro Qatar and you find it laughable?

I guess it's a matter of perspective. I agree with most of what they say, but if you have ties to the region or are pro ME for whatever reason, then you'll probably view it as western agenda.

Hardly the only guy.

The Athletic have been churning out anti ME articles by the week. Laurie whitwell in the lead.

Its no surprise since its an American publication. Same with Delaney who writes for ESPN as well. Quite obvious to see the agendas. Pander to your audience and what not.
 
Family money plus probably some backing from the financial institutions he's connected to - really not that complicated at all

Do you think that given the financial/debt problems United has just gone through over the past 18 years of the Glazers, that the fanbase have a right to know whether this is a thinly veiled Qatari state bid ? Nearly all money anyone from the royal family has is originally sourced from the Qatari state - so why not simply admit that it is, deal with the issue transparently so that all parties are aware this is not a private individual, but rather a tacit Qatari state actor attempting to buy United.
 
Hardly the only guy.

The Athletic have been churning out anti ME articles by the week. Laurie whitwell in the lead.

Its no surprise since its an American publication. Same with Delaney who writes for ESPN as well. Quite obvious to see the agendas. Pander to your audience and what not.

The agenda being of course, the viewpoint they’ve maintained for years that a country with thousands of deaths behind its wealth and prohibitive laws for gay people and women is not great?
 
Hardly the only guy.

The Athletic have been churning out anti ME articles by the week. Laurie whitwell in the lead.

Its no surprise since its an American publication. Same with Delaney who writes for ESPN as well. Quite obvious to see the agendas. Pander to your audience and what not.

Why would it matter if its based in the US ? Unless of course one has a problem with free speech and a free press.
 
You tell yourself that. There will be no difference in the eyes of many, however you spin it - myself potentially included. No club should be backed by a fecking State, or never have to feasibly watch their finances. Even the biggest clubs in the World should have to loan a Wout Weghorst in the winter if they’ve spent too much in the summer. Otherwise what’s the point in sport? Just fodder for teenage tweeters and FIFA shut ins? United have always had the moral high ground in these arguments. We’ve always been a ‘proper club’ …but so many are happy to piss it all away for a sugar daddy. When as you say, we don’t actually even need it!

Deep down that’s why a lot of fans are desperate to make these little get out clause excuses or play on the technicalities… because reminding them of how others will consider it all completely hollow does rankle - even if it’s just a little. And so it should. And If all naysayers like me can do is remind them of that, then fine.. I’ll take what I can get at this point.

‘Cos I want rid of the Glazers too, I have no power or influence on anything and I am completely resigned this happening… but I’ll be fecked if I’m lifting up my legs and lubing your collective conscience as well. I’d rather be a party pooper than a hypocrite.

Genuine question here. Are there actually people that this bothers? What fans of other clubs/journalists think of United and what we accomplish?

I know a lot of Chelsea fans and none of them have ever been bothered by this.

Then again I've never seen the appeal of claiming the moral high ground like a lot of our fanbase seem so fond of.
 
Genuine question here. Are there actually people that this bothers? What fans of other clubs/journalists think of United and what we accomplish?

I know a lot of Chelsea fans and none of them have ever been bothered by this.

Then again I've never seen the appeal of claiming the moral high ground like a lot of our fanbase seem so fond of.

It is literally not claiming the moral high ground. It is having the moral high ground. Chelsea’s riches came from a regime that is now murdering thousands and now stealing kids.
 
Everyone just needs to be nice to each other and accept it’s going to be Qatar.

It’s either going to be exciting or turn to shit. Whatever it is, it’ll be interesting.
People just like arguing with each other if it’s going to rain or not.
we have no control over this and there’s every chance we could spend less per summer than we did anyway since our squad is in better shape than it has been in a long time.
 
The agenda being of course, the viewpoint they’ve maintained for years that a country with thousands of deaths behind its wealth and prohibitive laws for gay people and women is not great?

Not sure which countries don't have thousands of deaths behind its wealth and prohibitive laws for gay people and women at some point in time?

What has that got to do with the Qatari bidders anyways? Is this Sheikh Jassim guy imparting these rules? Was he responsible for these deaths? Or shall we just lump them all together. Qataris are all one and the same.

Casual racism at its finest. :rolleyes:
 
Not sure which countries don't have thousands of deaths behind its wealth and prohibitive laws for gay people and women at some point in time?

What has that got to do with the Qatari bidders anyways? Is this Sheikh Jassim guy imparting these rules? Was he responsible for these deaths? Or shall we just lump them all together. Qataris are all one and the same.

Casual racism at its finest. :rolleyes:


Just awful awful arguments.
 
Genuine question here. Are there actually people that this bothers?

Absolutely.

I know a bunch of City fans that much preferred the old club because this new one is simply hollow. My mum’s fella stopped his ST after the first title season and barely gets to a game now, “it’s not the same club” has been uttered many times.

@Mockney as usual absolutely nails it. What’s even the point of sport if United don’t need to loan a Weghorst cause they’ve spunked away too much in the Summer, or if Real don’t let Makelele go cause wages mean nothing here.
 
Because there is a clear anti-ME agenda coming from American publications? Pretty obvious.

No there isn't. These are regular journos asking the tough questions that any responsible journo should be asking. It isn't their fault that Qatar is a corrupt, authoritarian nation where covering them results in negative stories.
 
No there isn't. These are regular journos asking the tough questions that any responsible journo should be asking. It isn't their fault that Qatar is a corrupt, authoritarian nation where covering them results in negative stories.

They aren't asking questions Raoul.

Those are opinion pieces.
 
They aren't asking questions Raoul.

Those are opinion pieces.

The narratives emanating out of these opinion pieces are questioning the legitimacy and wisdom of the State of Qatar buying United. This would also be the case if any other nation state led bid was on the table.
 
Obviously you don't have a counter argument to it.

Just pandering the usual line. Middle East. Bad. Human rights. Bad.

All the same people. Bad.

Can I use YOUR OWN WORDS to argue against you?

What has that got to do with the Qatari bidders anyways? Is this Sheikh Jassim guy imparting these rules? Was he responsible for these deaths? Or shall we just lump them all together. Qataris are all one and the same:

Its obviously state backed. Just like almost everything else of worth in Qatar.

But I suppose to appease the FA they still have to make an effort to at least seem independent. Appearances and all that.

Its no different from what the saudis did.
 
Absolutely.

I know a bunch of City fans that much preferred the old club because this new one is simply hollow. My mum’s fella stopped his ST after the first title season and barely gets to a game now, “it’s not the same club” has been uttered many times.

@Mockney as usual absolutely nails it. What’s even the point of sport if United don’t need to loan a Weghorst cause they’ve spunked away too much in the Summer, or if Real don’t let Makelele go cause wages mean nothing here.

Fair enough. Appreciate the feedback. I don't know anyone like this so it's good to hear other views on it. Personally it doesn't bother me.
 
Fair enough. Appreciate the feedback. I don't know anyone like this so it's good to hear other views on it. Personally it doesn't bother me.

Nothing against people who say “I don’t care that United’s future success will be bankrolled off the deaths of hundreds and thousands of vulnerable people”. I get that you can separate it.

100% can’t get behind people lying to themselves with awful arguments.
 
State backed financially :rolleyes:

Right. What is happening to you here is simple.


You have been caught making an argument you don’t even believe. I have literally proven you don’t believe those words.

So as a human being you have two options:

A) continue to lie to yourself and think you’re justified

B) Admit you have completely changed your arguments and moral viewpoints across a two month period to justify the fact your football team has more money.

That is absolutely fine. But fecking OWN it. Don’t make bad faith arguments. Just own the fact you’re excited by a transfer kitty.
 
Fair enough. Appreciate the feedback. I don't know anyone like this so it's good to hear other views on it. Personally it doesn't bother me.

It just bothers me the most because there’s only a handful of clubs, that if run well (not Glazer run), they can stick two fingers up to the nonsensical state ownership of football clubs & the bottomless pits of money they provide.

United & Real stand clear as two shining examples of clubs that absolutely can stand above it, one has been run so superbly that whilst the state owned clubs dither about year on year in the CL, they are undergoing huge stadium renovations, are financially in a brilliant position and win the CL almost every year.
The other has been run like shit and fans will therefore give up all the moral high ground of being a proper club that pays for itself, despite years of slating state ownership because they see dollar signs, shiny new stadiums and training centre, but these dollars we barely fecking need if we were just run well as a football club.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.