phelans shorts
Full Member
Haven’t you been advocating for Dubai/SaudiI didn't think there was anything that could make me stop supporting United.... Apple buying them might be it.
Haven’t you been advocating for Dubai/SaudiI didn't think there was anything that could make me stop supporting United.... Apple buying them might be it.
I think Sheikh Mansour has done a grand job at City and the area, nothing seedy about it and the Geordies will be challenging for the title soon. Football is changing, i would prefer Apple but wouldn`t care if it was Dubai or Saudi, I have visited both countries and seen lot`s of people and global companies making the most of the opportunities. I`m sure Liverpool or many other clubs in the premier league would jump at the chance, i prefer someone who can not only buy the club but invest big in the stadium etc otherwise we are going to be left behind. Obviously people can have their own views and Utd fans are divided on the ownership issue but the one thing we can all agree is get rid of the Glazers and no more investors that need to borrow to buy.Agreed. That’s the core issue in this take over.
Unless the Saudis pip them to it…
You can see why that might a peel to them….
Do explain why "professor of physics" or "professor of economics" in any way makes your "friend" anymore or less identifiable?
The only people that will have any insight are those involved with bids and deals and secondly, those with access to those people - family or journalists. So, unless your colleague from your work is one of those, they just gave you an opinion, they don't know anything more than the rest of us.
Do engage your brain; I have explained they could be identifiable, clearly you don't know, understand or engage in protecting identification of information/individuals.
The rest is speculation
Yeah, my point was more about what would attract Apple. They would need more growth than what we offer them now, the TV money boom is over - what happens next is the key thing.To be fair we have been saying this for decades. Bubble going to burst etc and it’s done nothing but grow. I remember the approach in 2011 and people saying they’d be mad to turn down 1.5 billion for the club.
Imo the EPL with cannibalise other top leagues and you’ll see values rise all over the league. It’ll be the super league with the contracts to back it up
I believe the Apple deal would bear fruit.
So it looks as if we'll get a bid from Saudi. Apple seems to be pie in the sky, though.
Unless the Saudis pip them to it…
You can see why that might a peel to them….
I actually get your point. I had a mate of a mate who knew told me about the “Kent variant”’ of COVID, prior to the public knowing about it (having been told by Hancock), and I was really really careful about how I put it on the Caf, as you don’t want to doxx somebody else. . But it really doesn’t help in terms of adding weight to his comment.
RIP Manchester UnitedIsnt MBS also a United fan? I could see them ditching Newcastle if they manage to get United through some other mean and then later transfer it to PIF. They would make a cool profit on Newcastle as well
Isnt MBS also a United fan? I could see them ditching Newcastle if they manage to get United through some other mean and then later transfer it to PIF. They would make a cool profit on Newcastle as well
FFP? United are already the richest club on earth. Without the debt and with trillionaire owners our revenue will go on signings, apple could finance infrastructure themselves.With the glazers and debt we are already the biggest spenders in world football on the transfer front. That’s with the yearly interests payment and dividendsI know but I don’t see them spending how oil states tend to. It just doesn’t make much sense for Apple to buy us.
They’d be a great buyer, they have some serious juice. When we see their plans, I’m sure any resistance to their bid might crumble.
We do get a lot of tax breaks so i dont think interest payments and dividends expenses would magically disappearFFP? United are already the richest club on earth. Without the debt and with trillionaire owners our revenue will go on signings, apple could finance infrastructure themselves.With the glazers and debt we are already the biggest spenders in world football on the transfer front. That’s with the yearly interests payment and dividends
IMO, this is a definite. It's not something that is around the corner, however, you can see so many opportunities with this. This is an example of why Apple purchasing Manchester United makes sense. So much more to come between football and technology. Just imagine what Old Trafford would be like.
Reason why the government & FA will find a way to disallow it. (Assuming they try to buy us)That's something a juggernaut like Apple could go in and challenge. Apple/Microsoft + Manchester United could go toe to toe against anyone if they want to including the British Government (let alone the FA)
And Rooney’s.
I’m calling it now, this is going to go to an insane bidding war and end up being £12bn-15bn+. I just hope the government steps in to this one and ensures that United’s infrastructure is properly invested in by whoever takes it over and that United’s match going support are respected.
No, don't like them either.Haven’t you been advocating for Dubai/Saudi
Private sector means one of the private companies or businessmen? Should be noted, one of twitters biggest investors after Elon is a Saudi national.Shit
What argument. That they may buy the team? I think it's possible. That's not really an argument unless you're looking for something to argue about.Well I'm a huge fan of Apple and I'd love them to buy the club. But every argument seems to be "but United are really popular" and little else.
So buying an unpopular brand doesn’t bring any more benefits than buying a global institution with insane brand name and 1b fanbase?
So what’s the argument here?
Fair enough, mistaken identity on my part. As you were.No, don't like them either.
I wonder where the VR technology is currently at, never tested a set myself, guessing developing and perfecting the technology must be quite expensive.
With regards to Apple/Amazon, it would be handy to have an iconic stadium to rebuild with the potential of this technology in mind.
The ready-made consumer base to sell the product to should also be appealing.
Apple have a TV channel and they bought the rights of something popular to show on it. The strategy is very simple.
But they didn't buy an MLS club or an MLB team, they only bought the TV rights. What we've seen so far suggests they don't want to be involved in sports development, but rather sports broadcasting. Buying United doesn't get you the rights to show their games live, and probably never will. You'd hardly call the ability so show 90 minutes matches the day after the game was played an enticing prospect for subscribers. And even if they thought it was, just strike a deal with United to show their highlights. You don't need the club for that.
Worse still, it could be a future problem owning a club. What if the PL TV rights come on the market again and Apple decide they want them? Owning a club could be a conflict of interest that might stop them bidding for the TV rights in the future. If showing more European football is their aim - which seems entirely likely - then being a club owner might actually muddy the waters.
What argument. That they may buy the team? I think it's possible. That's not really an argument unless you're looking for something to argue about.
I still don't understand. Are you demanding some sort of proof or something.Not an argument as in "a heated exchange of views", an argument as in "the reasoning given in support of something".
Who do you like then?! I don’t get at all what’s wrong with Apple.No, don't like them either.
Why does Apple have so much cash reserve anyway?
The debt would most likely get cleared. So interest payments will obviously stop if there’s no debt.We do get a lot of tax breaks so i dont think interest payments and dividends expenses would magically disappear
Apple is literally the best option out there. They’re richer than any oil state and don’t come with the baggage of having dodgy human rights records. I don’t get why anyone would actively be against them buying us over as unlikely as it would be.
I still don't understand. Are you demanding some sort of proof or something.
Apple is literally the best option out there. They’re richer than any oil state and don’t come with the baggage of having dodgy human rights records. I don’t get why anyone would actively be against them buying us over as unlikely as it would be.