Leg-End
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2004
- Messages
- 19,864
Must be so easy to be a journalist at times, literally link any big company in the world to it and rake in the clicks.
I think any interest from Amazon or Apple will without doubt depend on what they believe possible with streaming & content. The market for United there is absolutely enormous and would grow apple tv+ or primetv massively.
For context during the 2018/19 season, our games generated a cumulative audience reach of over 3.5 billion viewers, according to the Futures Data, across 200 territories. On a per game basis, our 53 games attracted an average cumulative audience reach of 68 million.
Not to be horrible but won't he be dead in a few years? Would seem a bit of a whirlwind ownership.
Same principle as transfers. Pick a player then add three of the big clubs being interested for the clicks. Funny how it's very rare for only one club to be interested in buying a player these days. Big names = big interest. Wouldn't get the same worldwide coverage if it was only Sir Jim and Betfred involved.Must be so easy to be a journalist at times, literally link any big company in the world to it and rake in the clicks.
INEOS won't be able to out-bid the others, no chance.
Presume the Glazers are obliged to clear the debt upon sale? Similar to if you sold your gaff you would need to clear the mortgage? I suppose however the new owners could complete a leveraged buy out.
Apple interest confirmed
Not legal anymore.Presume the Glazers are obliged to clear the debt upon sale? Similar to if you sold your gaff you would need to clear the mortgage? I suppose however the new owners could complete a leveraged buy out.
at those tech company rumours. Like feck Apple would be interested
Is there this much silliness with regards to Liverpool being up for sale, or is it just us?
Amazes me people buy it. Whitwell, Luckhurst etc basically anyone on the Man Utd beat are always going to be reliable. They don’t post nonsense.
Wait what ?
Don't think leveraged buyouts are allowed anymore, I assume any sale price includes paying off the debt.
All I can see is the original report coming from The Star so sounds like bollocks to me, can’t for the life of me see why they would be interested in a football club.
They often report exactly the same stuff. All those guys have the same/similar sources. Also, a transfer never ever happens without them reporting on it, no matter how credible the link from foreign media etc.Tbh Luckhurst has a habit of reading RedCafe and publishing stories that we would probably like. Hard to judge how reliable he really is. Whitwell is a completely different matter.
what? they wouldn't have the rights to stream it. They would need to bid for it, just like Sky, BT etc.Can see why they would be interested. They have apple tv, owning united and streaming united games in time would draw a lot of subscribers.
Exactly. Whoever buys United needs unlimited wealth to compete with City. It’s a different landscape.I think the logic of some of these fans is the more money the owner has, the less they would need to load the club up with debt and the more we can throw our financial weight to stay relevant.
Too old. Do not want
This is the reason right here that apple would want united. Apple + is a big growth area for them and having united games live would be huge.Why would Apple be interested? It's likely that clubs will be able to negotiate their own tv rights deals in the future, and apple would have a worldwide platform ready to go. Loads of content ready for Apple +
We're in the middle of the battle of the streaming platforms, could see it being a big content generator for their platform.
Apple interest confirmed
Why would Apple be interested? It's likely that clubs will be able to negotiate their own tv rights deals in the future, and apple would have a worldwide platform ready to go. Loads of content ready for Apple +
We're in the middle of the battle of the streaming platforms, could see it being a big content generator for their platform.
What's funny is that if it is true that we have a line of Billionaires around the block looking to buy us already, it just goes to show just how much potential this club has and points out how unbelievably horrendous the Glazers were in tapping that potential. Some of the absolute worst businessmen i've ever seen, absolutely no long term vision or planning, all about the quick buck.
Does anybody remember why Rupert Murdoch was not allowed to buy United? I remember some sort of conflict of interest being cited.
I think it’s something to do with owning a club where you also will be bidding on TV rights. If that’s the case, then if Apple did buy united I presume they would be confirming they have no intention of ever showing EPL games live or bidding on the rights.
They don't need to? Just match the asking price.
I don't offer more for a mars bar when the asking price is 70p
No, it's the clubs debt now. Not the Glazers.Don't think leveraged buyouts are allowed anymore, I assume any sale price includes paying off the debt.
He owned sky who had football media rights on the EPL
We want him for his business nowse and his wallet, he’s not filling the No.9 position!Too old. Do not want
We want him for his business nowse and his wallet, he’s not filling the No.9 position!