Tom Van Persie
No relation
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Messages
- 27,803
I'd go for Gignac personally
But that's the thing. There is a degree of separation and plausible independence from the Qatar state, whose QIA fund owns the fund (QSI) that actually owns PSG.Yep, seems like you guys are probably right (and my previous posts talking about the crown prince are wrong).
Those pro the Qatar bid should be offended though, they didn't even put one of their top guys as the front man!
Was fired by United as he was in court for battery of his wifeWhats wrong with Butt?
It’s all smoke and mirrors. This is state backed.Bit poor.
Swear people slate these journos simply because they report things they don't want to hear@stw2022 So, a "sports" journalist did know things??
Because no one wants to be happy on the CAF and revel in self pityWhy is it?
I'd go for Gignac personally
Owners that don't lock up gay people in their country?
Obsessed much?Whats wrong with Butt?
To be fair, that guy became the butt of the joke because even back in August when Ratcliffe came out and said he's interested, he stubbornly kept arguing this kind of stuff 'doesn't get done publicly' or something along those lines .Swear people slate these journos simply because they report things they don't want to hear
So many prove time and time again that they are actually clued in and have genuine sources on the matters they report but they're slandered and labelled as BS merchants for simply reporting whatever information they've been told or passed on.
Feels very forced
Swear people slate these journos simply because they report things they don't want to hear
So many prove time and time again that they are actually clued in and have genuine sources on the matters they report but they're slandered and labelled as BS merchants for simply reporting whatever information they've been told or passed on.
So they are poorer than INEOS
I'd go for Gignac personally
They probably included the debt being paid off as part of their bid
The two are nowhere near the same. I wouldn't be surprised if this 92 foundation got a massive injection from the state because they like their causes so much which helps them build a new stadium or renovate.So they are poorer than INEOS
So they are poorer than INEOS
He's the Qatari state mouthpieceIs this guy legit? Or some wanker who paid Twitter 10$ a month for the checkmark?