Yeah, anyone who doesn't go along with your views are 13-25 year olds who only salivate about transfers.
Club Sale | It’s done!
- Thread starter JB08
- Start date
- Status
We asked our contestants whether they would rather:
A. Receive a blowjob from their mother.
B. Jerk off their father
C. Get fecked in the arse by their brother
D. Comment other
62% said receive a blowjob from their mother
This rubbish will never stop me from supporting Man Utd. And never will it prevent any ME country from taking over our dear club.
If you know you can't cope,just fvck off.
So if i live in Qatar there will be no anti-lgbt laws and migrant workers won't be treated like slaves?
Very Freudian
I don't know about you guys but I would be shitting myself if Qatari investors would be closer to buy Liverpool. I am soo happy it's us.
Firstly you have to realize several things their views regarding homosexuality is stemmed from how it's prohibited in Islam, that's why in all Muslim countries bar one or two it's taken very offensively.
Whereas for the right of women, it's backward but women over there atleast 90 percent of them wants to live that way, that is what I know from my friends and colleagues and discussion from my visits in Qatar, that they want to be dependent of their male guardians and spend their immense wealth.
The west agenda picks out 5 Qatari women who studied from England or USA and came back to Qatar and get their views and obviously their views are different but overall it's not the same. Labour laws are poor and should be improved.
I am living in UAE right now, they and Saudis hate Qatar, so if they had bought Liverpool, it would become a dick swinging contest to ensure one of them gets on top. We would be left soo far behind with current ownership.
Firstly they would never make unpopular decisions like make drastic changes or sack Ten hag etc. They will infact be the most reasonable among all other owners, they will install competent people, they will get them even if by paying over the top wages to entice them.
Whereas I believe with Radcliffe or Musk they will think too highly of themselves and try to get involve ala Boehly and make the life insufferable for manager.
Plus they will invest heavily and not back out or demand any return from their investment and will not stop unless we get to the top of echelon and that's what we strive to achieve don't we?
Or maybe the moral brigade would be happy being in the shadows of Liverpool, City, Newcastle and Arsenal and be happy in the Europa League.
Firstly you have to realize several things their views regarding homosexuality is stemmed from how it's prohibited in Islam, that's why in all Muslim countries bar one or two it's taken very offensively.
Whereas for the right of women, it's backward but women over there atleast 90 percent of them wants to live that way, that is what I know from my friends and colleagues and discussion from my visits in Qatar, that they want to be dependent of their male guardians and spend their immense wealth.
The west agenda picks out 5 Qatari women who studied from England or USA and came back to Qatar and get their views and obviously their views are different but overall it's not the same. Labour laws are poor and should be improved.
I am living in UAE right now, they and Saudis hate Qatar, so if they had bought Liverpool, it would become a dick swinging contest to ensure one of them gets on top. We would be left soo far behind with current ownership.
Firstly they would never make unpopular decisions like make drastic changes or sack Ten hag etc. They will infact be the most reasonable among all other owners, they will install competent people, they will get them even if by paying over the top wages to entice them.
Whereas I believe with Radcliffe or Musk they will think too highly of themselves and try to get involve ala Boehly and make the life insufferable for manager.
Plus they will invest heavily and not back out or demand any return from their investment and will not stop unless we get to the top of echelon and that's what we strive to achieve don't we?
Or maybe the moral brigade would be happy being in the shadows of Liverpool, City, Newcastle and Arsenal and be happy in the Europa League.
You're having that assumption because of what happened at PSG but you forgot one important factor. The fans, we have a vast sum of them whom will dictate and influence the outcome of anyone be it a player or a manager. It happened before and will happen again. You cant compare PSG's small and plastic fanbase to ours. We'll stand by ten hag no matter what and I guarantee you that the Qataris will respecte it is they're a sensible people.
Their style in running PSG speaks otherwise
Their will be anti LGBT laws because it's prohibited in the religion and they are just following the religion, it's the same as Hindu people finding Cow as sacred, whereas you will be feasting on kebabs and beef steak.
Would not you respecting their religion and their beliefs if you are in India?
Updated for a more fitting analogy
Well their running style has resulted in PSG becoming a well renowned club with arguably the top 3 players including a GOAT and potential best player in the world playing for them.
They are regularly in the semis of Champions League and were unlucky several times. If you are going to critisice them for not winning the champions League, I would argue It's the same as SAF with Utd, you need a lot of luck to win the champions league.
If someone's religion permits them to rape their wife your presumed respect for that isn't one I'd share
That’s a hell of an argument. Pick the guy who won the Champions League twice.
They aren't asking you to share.
Sorry, respecting people who dont respect homosexuals is not my thing.
And jesus (no religious pun intended), the descent of this thread the last couple of posts. Suddenly there are no migrant worker problem and anti-lgbt laws are quite alright because it’s only religion.
Let the mindbending begin. Soon we’ll all defend and excuse the shit doings of our Qatari overlords.
You would though?
You have to imagine that these people would have been defending apartheid South Africa from the criticism if this were 40 years ago.
So what if they treat black people appallingly? It's their country, respect it.
Shows how blinked some are when it comes to their football team. Literally nothing they won't defend. If Gary Glitter made a bid they'd be arguing that what right do we have to decide our age of consent laws are the right ones.
"Respect"
Thank feck for the tweets only thread. It really does get quite depressing coming onto a football forum and reading discussions relating to rape, murder, racism, homophobia etc.
PSG were like Man City 2009. Small time club with no direction where they could tear it up multiple times until it can work.It can't be compered to what's going on at Man United where the manager have established a working formula and just needs the support in the market. From the news we heared they are excited to work with ETH and will creat an environment where he'll thrive eventually. This move to buy United at the best possible time it's surreal and can be the catalyst to a greater things.
A does make the most sense though, if you’re a heterosexual male.
Just absolutely insane.
Sure they might treat human beings as second class citizens but India doesn’t eat cows!
So many people seem to have missed the news about City getting done for breaching FFP. A new owner isn't going to splurge any more money on players than anyone else buying the club outright. We don't need a fecking cheat code.
Good for you being honest mate. Personally I’d have gone for D and said something like “A blowjob from Margot Robbie” but each to their own.
It's one thing accepting little influence we each have over who owns us. It's another to dismiss human rights abuses as something we now need to "respect" because other countries decide to engage in them.
It's possible to be resigned to the fact that capitalism is bad and we can't help who owns us and not make yourself look like a shitty human being at the same time.
It's possible to be resigned to the fact that capitalism is bad and we can't help who owns us and not make yourself look like a shitty human being at the same time.
Another aspect of getting qatari owners is that it will divide our fanbase. The great part of being a United fan - to me at least - is that you’re part of a common fanbase with one religion that is United. I would probably hate to be standing cheering United with say 50% of people next to me who’d be willing to defend Qatar’s human rights record.
I’d hate to see a divided fanbase. I know Redcafe can be over the top but bringing politics into the picture will bring a whole new dimension
I’d hate to see a divided fanbase. I know Redcafe can be over the top but bringing politics into the picture will bring a whole new dimension
It’s a once in a lifetime chance to own one of the biggest sports franchise in the world. Not to mention a highly profitable organization that really can sustain itself if freed from debt repayments. The cash flow generated alone is among the most in the world of sports, with obvious room for growth in the future.
The infrastructure will need investment, but you would imagine it would bring a healthy ROI, especially if they can pull off building a new stadium.
It’s as “Risk free” of an investment as you can get in the world of sports.
I wanted to say something but then I realized no saint person would want to spend 6bil on a football club. It's just a case of pick your poison. There's no lesser of two devils here, the answer depends on where people come from.
Well I happen to like my mom very much. Thankyou.
Is there a verse in Quran about anti LGBT laws?
Rumours of Joel and Avram still want to be part of the shareholders, so get your hopes up - you could get Glazer poison mixed with Qatari poison. Best of both worlds
There is a bit about owning slaves in the bible, which is why the slave trade is defended so often here. Respecting someone's religion, etc.
It’s only the clueless espn cnuts who are “reporting” this. It’s more of an opinion. The real story is that nobody is sure about the Glazers intentions, but all facts point to a full sale being the most probable.
It could also be the Glazers sending a message to bidders that they will only accept a higher than premium bid for a full sale.
Mark goldbridge and his fanboys are a bunch of cnuts so that poll doesn't surprise me one bit. I bet a large portion of those votes are driven by pricks wanting better squad rating on FIFA and thinking doing a City is the fastest and easiest way to do it.
I was thinking of the Tuchel incident where a disagreement led to a clash and then dismissal. He was their best chance at a CL, they then wasted 2+ years with Poch. Imagine a scenario where ETH says inadvertently something supportive of LGBT+ groups in the context of their homophobic laws, and I can see tensions, especially if he isn't their guy to begin with.
That's something from the past. Now we are good together and we cooperate all the time and have shown that through the last WC. Where Tamim was supporting the Saudis himself.
Last edited:
Yeah, I guess we should interpret the Bible by the letter and live by it just like 500, 600 years ago.
Just read that Winterburn tweet... Qataris bid not being "great for football". Yeah God beware we become competitive again right? The hypocrisy when the Qataris buy us will be unbearable. Its not like the competition in football and especially the PL hasn't been fecked for a long time already.
Reminds me of when the glazers took over. Our fan base was divided then. So much so that FC United was created and some swore to never support our club again.
Yet when UAE bought City it was great for football I guess.
- Status