Worth more than human life in some countries. Have tried to adopt one.Happily killing whales.
Worth more than human life in some countries. Have tried to adopt one.Happily killing whales.
Singapore has two sovereign wealth funds with total values worth over a trillion.
Cheers, they've owned PSG for 12 years. So it's not guaranteed they'd look to redevelop OT or Carrington right away if they buy United.
It'll likely be Qatar Airways like P$G and Roma and Barcelona beforeThat's definitely happening, TeamViewer want out so I'll be surprised if Qatar doesn't slap Doha Dave's Car Repair Service on our shirts
“The Qataris are certified scum”Do you consider Gulf state dictators nice people?
The Norwegian government wouldn't dare, too many Liverpool fans over there, besides it would be no different to a private investment consortium, it's there to make money for the people of Norway so they can have the things that Brit's can only dream ofPocket change for Norway.
That last paragraph (apart from maybe anti LGBT) could easily be said for the 'greedy capitalist pigs' mentioned in relation with the sale of the club. For some reason that is accepted in the Western world and pretty much never comes under heavy scrutiny.
Yep. Got that.Corrected
UEFA won't be an issue. PSG and Al-Khelaifi essentially run UEFA since the ESL shat the bedI reckon if they want to this deal through with minimal fuss, there’ll be conversations had with the premier league and UEFA that they won’t push to join/back any ESL proposals.
The Norwegian government wouldn't dare, too many Liverpool fans over there, besides it would be no different to a private investment consortium, it's there to make money for the people of Norway so they can have the things that Brit's can only dream of
To be fair they've tried buying the Parc De Princes in view of modernizing and expanding it but the municipality of Paris rejected it after long negotiations.Cheers, they've owned PSG for 12 years. So it's not guaranteed they'd look to redevelop OT or Carrington right away if they buy United.
This will happen and they’ll stick Becks in as the face of it all.
TrueBuying United would be the worst ROI in the funds history. For that reason alone they would never even entertain it.
Capitalist greed absolutely comes under scrutiny in the US, it's just that the US has moved so far to the right that when we do scrutinize it we're berated as filthy communists.
And for all its problems, let's not pretend America treats women like second-class citizens like they are in the Middle Eastern countries we're talking about.
Dude, stop pedalling myths and fake news. Ratcliffe isn’t going to saddle the club with debt. He simply doesn’t need to, nor would it be wise as an incoming owner to knock the fan base offside from the get go. The tweet clearly said he had gained funding via INEOS to pay off the Glazers debt. It would not impact the club negatively in the slightest, nor would it leverage anything against the club and future earnings.If you looked into how Jim plans to buy us you wouldn’t. With Qatar we will have ownership with a strong desire to win and we won’t be saddled with more debt repayments or people who want their money back (JP Morgan, Goldman).
Buying United would be the worst ROI in the funds history. For that reason alone they would never even entertain it.
It would be a huge mistake for Fergie to get involved, his legacy would be tarnished, maybe not so much with United fans but football fans in general, I think he learned his lesson with Glazer's so he'll keep schtumMakes the most sense if they paid fergie and have him be their front man. That would kill off any pushback
A lot of rumours Ferdinand is going to be involved with the Qataris on this.
If he's having to bank loan just to buy the club, how's he going to invest in the players we need, plus a new stadium, training ground etc etc.Dude, stop pedalling myths and fake news. Ratcliffe isn’t going to saddle the club with debt. He simply doesn’t need to, nor would it be wise as an incoming owner to knock the fan base offside from the get go. The tweet clearly said he had gained funding via INEOS to pay off the Glazers debt. It would not impact the club negatively in the slightest, nor would it leverage anything against the club and future earnings.
The Norwegian government wouldn't dare, too many Liverpool fans over there, besides it would be no different to a private investment consortium, it's there to make money for the people of Norway so they can have the things that Brit's can only dream of
You’re absolutely insane if you think the clubs money in future won’t be used to pay money back.Dude, stop pedalling myths and fake news. Ratcliffe isn’t going to saddle the club with debt. He simply doesn’t need to, nor would it be wise as an incoming owner to knock the fan base offside from the get go. The tweet clearly said he had gained funding via INEOS to pay off the Glazers debt. It would not impact the club negatively in the slightest, nor would it leverage anything against the club and future earnings.
It would be a huge mistake for Fergie to get involved, his legacy would be tarnished, maybe not so much with United fans but football fans in general, I think he learned his lesson with Glazer's so he'll keep schtum
Football fans outside of the United fanbase don't give one toss about Fergie endorsing the Glazers when they took overIt would be a huge mistake for Fergie to get involved, his legacy would be tarnished, maybe not so much with United fans but football fans in general, I think he learned his lesson with Glazer's so he'll keep schtum
Dude, stop pedalling myths and fake news. Ratcliffe isn’t going to saddle the club with debt. He simply doesn’t need to, nor would it be wise as an incoming owner to knock the fan base offside from the get go. The tweet clearly said he had gained funding via INEOS to pay off the Glazers debt. It would not impact the club negatively in the slightest, nor would it leverage anything against the club and future earnings.
Thats a 1B sponsor right thereDoha Dave's Car Repair Service
Any news on your end?
Insider reports from the qatari media etc.
Thanks for your perspective Abdullah!
In my younger days I was working in the shipping industry and at that time we did a lot of business in the ME between 1990-2012 and I share that same experience as you regarding people/companies from that region. Most of the time we had our business meetings in Dubai and it’s easy to get impressed with what’s going on in Dubai/Doha/Abu Dhabi from an financial point of view. The amount of money that often is involved is hard to grasp but these economical resources often make them get very good results.
When we were first put up for sale my dream was Qatar to buy us. Can’t believe it’s actually happening
always assumed we would be stuck with Malcolm glazer and Qatar would go for Liverpool
Why would INEOS (2021 turnover £18.8Bn, profit £3.5bn) take money from the club (2021 turnover £583m, loss £115m) to pay off a debt in INEOSs name? Where and how does that make any sense?You’re absolutely insane if you think the clubs money in future won’t be used to pay money back.
I’d have been fairly happy with a red knight or 2 to be honest.So what you want is a white knight sugar daddy then.
Well said.Can’t wait until this guy gets banned.
Every Journo out there including non sport sources are reporting Qatar interest and because he denied that story days ago he’s stuck in his stance that daft cnut
Musk and a sugar daddy? You're kidding me, right?Well he is consistently recorded by those who deal with this kind of thing as being the richest or second most richest individual in the world, he doesn't necessarily need outside help, in some cases he doesn't want to take all the risk presumably
Personally I wouldn't want him within a million miles of the club but he's also the likeliest person (along with Bezos) who could be the equivalent of a sugar daddy like Roman
I find that fecking weird. Qatar has done a lot worse than engage in conspiracy theories. They used debt slavery to build the World Cup ffs.