Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thought I read the other day the Glazers still don’t want to sell and are only interested in investors, This news of a sale was just testing the market to see what is possible.

They’ve probably maximised the money the club can return without major investment hence why they are looking for investors.

Does feel as if the “selling“ news has died down a bit as you would think there would be news of more bidders than just Ratcliffe.
Avram and Joel obviously don't want to sell up, but the money isn't there anymore. No potential investor with any sense will trust the Glazer's management of the club and will want full control themselves.
 
Avram and Joel obviously don't want to sell up, but the money isn't there anymore. No potential investor with any sense will trust the Glazer's management of the club and will want full control themselves.
I do hope their hand is forced but I really don’t want to get my hopes up so I’m going to prepare for disappointment that they will find someone out there to invest with them.
 
What a crappy consolation prize that is!
A bit like Bullseye back in the day “let’s see what you could have won! Oh it’s an Austin Metro, bad luck Nevermind!”:lol:

Always cracked me up when they won the main prize and it’d be a speedboat yet the winners lived in Birmingham with no water around them :lol::lol::lol:
 
Just finished watching The war on football miniseries and it just saddens me to see this club being dragged into all the shady shit Agnelli and Perez were coming up with.
The sooner the lot goes the better.
 
Over the months I've gone from delight over the departure of the Glazers to a sudden feeling of dread of what is to come.
 
I’m starting to wonder if the Glazers will actually sell, it’s been a while now since the release of any positive news. Get the impression they want to hang on and just attract outside investment.
 
Unless you are freak like Elon Musk, there are substantial steps to go through and it takes time….

Just relax and let the process unfold
 
Man this is moving so slowly. I thought we would get a clearly picture end of January, start of Feb but it seems like this is either going to take a long time or gonna get announced out of the blue
This very tweet was posted here within the last couple pages. Relax.

 
Thought I read the other day the Glazers still don’t want to sell and are only interested in investors, This news of a sale was just testing the market to see what is possible.

They’ve probably maximised the money the club can return without major investment hence why they are looking for investors.

Does feel as if the “selling“ news has died down a bit as you would think there would be news of more bidders than just Ratcliffe.

If, say, Unilever was “up for sale”, you wouldn’t be getting news of bidders getting tweeted or published on a daily basis, even on CNBC or elsewhere. There are bigger sales and transactions than MUFC going on all the time, and most serious “bidders” keep quiet.
 
Noticed today that Ineos have a sponsorship deal with Tottenham

Wouldn’t that be a conflict of interest if they do buy United?
 
Noticed today that Ineos have a sponsorship deal with Tottenham

Wouldn’t that be a conflict of interest if they do buy United?

Nope,

Qatar own PSG but have sponsorship deals in various forms with many other clubs. Nobody brings up Emirates and their sponsorship of Arsenal when they mention Dubai potentially buying us.
 
Noticed today that Ineos have a sponsorship deal with Tottenham

Wouldn’t that be a conflict of interest if they do buy United?

Don't worry about that. If Ineos bought us and Spurs bottle it to do us a favour then no one would notice that.
 
Just finished watching The war on football miniseries and it just saddens me to see this club being dragged into all the shady shit Agnelli and Perez were coming up with.
The sooner the lot goes the better.

I wonder if Ceferin orchestrated Juve's latest investigation and Agnelli's downfall. Show of strength and power within the UEFA community.
 
It's a bit worrying that the only person to come out and admit they're interested is Ratcliffe. I'm sure there will be many offers tabled, so why are the others so quiet? Or is this what I fear the most...? A Ratcliffe PR stunt...
 
It's a bit worrying that the only person to come out and admit they're interested is Ratcliffe. I'm sure there will be many offers tabled, so why are the others so quiet? Or is this what I fear the most...? A Ratcliffe PR stunt...
Don’t worry, billionaires don’t usually state their intent to spend billions on a company in a takeover. It doesn’t make sense to tell everyone what you’re trying to buy.
 
I wonder if Ceferin orchestrated Juve's latest investigation and Agnelli's downfall. Show of strength and power within the UEFA community.
Wouldn't surprise me one bit, he was stabbed in the back pretty hard. Payback is a bitch.
 
Wouldn't surprise me one bit, he was stabbed in the back pretty hard. Payback is a bitch.

The only thing I disagree with the mini-series is the genesis of the money in football and the influx of petro-dollar owners. They didn't go back far enough.

Like anything it's a combo of factors -- FIFA commercialisation of the world cup in the early 80s showed that the sport is highly underappreciated commercially.

But also the Taylor commission forced clubs to reform and seek new multiple revenue streams. They couldn't afford the required changes and clubs couldn't be sustainable under those set of changes, all things remaining equal.

And what formed the Taylor Commission? The very reason why the sport was so popular? Tribalism.
Two sides to every coin. And yet the same attribute.

That's why I have given up on the judging the morality of potential owners and the unintended consquences. It's part of the de/evolutionary stages of the sport -- the trigger points started nearly 40 yrs ago.
 
Last edited:
Hoping for some more credible news next week, or maybe even this week. I think the time of knowing who our potential owners are going to be, is fast approaching.
 


Rehashing old news. Low official interest and the reason being the high price. No other bidders other than Ratcliffe, who won't overpay. Crystal Palace owners and Qatari interested in minority stake.
 


Rehashing old news. Low official interest and the reason being the high price. No other bidders other than Ratcliffe, who won't overpay. Crystal Palace owners and Qatari interested in minority stake.


That sounds grim. Hopefully the rumours of official bids being submitted this week are true and we’ll start hearing about more potential buyers.
 
Yeah hoping for some news on bids this week, I think the reliable people said mid feb wed see bids come in, so no panic even if it does not leak out this week.
Still on track for Q1 sale.

Need some dirty IKN news to tide us over, any links?
 
That sounds grim. Hopefully the rumours of official bids being submitted this week are true and we’ll start hearing about more potential buyers.

There’s absolutely nothing in (boring) Matt Slater’s piece. He’s got no news so pretends there’s nothing happening. Perhaps there is nothing happening, but Slater doesn’t know either way.
 


Rehashing old news. Low official interest and the reason being the high price. No other bidders other than Ratcliffe, who won't overpay. Crystal Palace owners and Qatari interested in minority stake.


No surprise. There has been very little reporting supporting the idea that an auction is going on.

Besides one report from the gulf some months ago, as well as the Saudi sports minister making some throwaway remarks, no credible information has surfaced about rivals to Ineos.

I am not an expert but it kinda feels like a one horse race: Ineos or nothing. It's up to the Glazers whether they will drop their unrealistic asking price or, just accept reality, sell at a suitable price and bank their profit.
 


Rehashing old news. Low official interest and the reason being the high price. No other bidders other than Ratcliffe, who won't overpay. Crystal Palace owners and Qatari interested in minority stake.


As expected, really. None of the nation states mooted as potential buyers by transfer obsessives on twitter, make very much sense. That's a good thing. People pissing their pants laughing at City in the FFP thread, suggesting that their league titles (assuming they are allowed to keep them) will forever be asterisked, would do well to remember that United will be in exactly the same position a few years down the line if the Saudis/Qatar/Dubai (pick your favourite oil funded autocracy), buy the club.
 
We just need some clarification and stability right now. At this point I’d settle for Sir Jim taking over, even though we might not have as much money to spend as under a sheik or consortium. As far as the Glazers are concerned, I wouldn’t put them past them to try and cling on for as long as possible unfortunately.
 
Will today's announcement about City have any effect on the Glazers (& FSG) decision to consider selling, or put potential buyers off?
 
Will today's announcement about City have any effect on the Glazers (& FSG) decision to consider selling, or put potential buyers off?

The decision by the Premier League to charge City with these financial regulation offences and the impending (although now delayed) announcement regarding the independent regulator will probably serve to put off nation states or nefarious individuals from investing, while at the same time encouraging investment from other individuals/entities who were previously concerned about having to compete with the aforementioned states/crooks.

Basically, football getting its house in order with regards to finance should encourage sensible and sustainable investment.
 
Will today's announcement about City have any effect on the Glazers (& FSG) decision to consider selling, or put potential buyers off?
It’ll affect the fanbase. Someone just allowing us to spend our money instead of oil money will be the overwhelming opinion now.
not having to pump your own money to compete with City could wake a lot of Potential buyers up
 
Interesting times but doubt it will put off nation states because we generate enough money so owners won't need to resort to dodgy dealings
 
The decision by the Premier League to charge City with these financial regulation offences and the impending (although now delayed) announcement regarding the independent regulator will probably serve to put off nation states or nefarious individuals from investing, while at the same time encouraging investment from other individuals/entities who were previously concerned about having to compete with the aforementioned states/crooks.

Basically, football getting its house in order with regards to finance should encourage sensible and sustainable investment.

But will City be actually charged and punished? And will sensible and sustainable investment be actually encouraged?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.