Berbaclass
Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
MUST said his people reached out and said there will be more said soon.I wonder if Ratcliffe will have a press conference in the NY and answer any of the questions we ask on here?
MUST said his people reached out and said there will be more said soon.I wonder if Ratcliffe will have a press conference in the NY and answer any of the questions we ask on here?
What the hell is this nonsense? We aren't mimicking Brighton, we're Man United FFS
Equally no signs they aren't willing to sell either.
Basically both sides of this argument are talking shite because simply put, nobody knows.
Surely one more protest will let Jassim know he's in all our hearts.
Big tomorrow day next week
If my memory serves me correctly, you were predicting week after week that Jassim and Qatar were going to pony up the extra billion needed to get it over the line.
What happened?
Exactly. If yesterday were the trigger for more it would have been in the press release.Pretty sure if that was the case mate they’d be announcing those plans to show intent to the fans regarding the stadium. Let’s see but I wouldn’t hold my breath
We live in a world where most press releases will tell you what a person/thing is going to do, not what it is not.Equally no signs they aren't willing to sell either.
Basically both sides of this argument are talking shite because simply put, nobody knows.
I think, funds permitting on Sir Jim's part, it will end up with him as the majority owner and the two holdouts in Joel and Avram being minority owners. Over the years we are going to see the other siblings stepping out and Sir Jim being on hand to buy them out and this deal will form the basis of future transactions that will have Ratcliffe getting an agreed portion in class B and the rest in class A.There’s no signs that they’ll sell anymore shares they’ve got a billion to shut the siblings up and there’s no option of future shares being available as it stands that’s the facts. Not sure what you’re writing honestly
Could be holding that back until it’s ratified by the FA and PL and all official in case they run in to issues (as unlikely as that is)Pretty sure if that was the case mate they’d be announcing those plans to show intent to the fans regarding the stadium. Let’s see but I wouldn’t hold my breath
The stadium and how it will be funded are strategic and operational issues to be decided by the parties internally so there is no need to announce them with the deal that just outlined the new ownership structure. For all intents and purposes the new co-owners seem to he more preoccupied with sorting the first team.Pretty sure if that was the case mate they’d be announcing those plans to show intent to the fans regarding the stadium. Let’s see but I wouldn’t hold my breath
Exactly! @Castia keeps on reaching though for as much negative spin they can muster!
There is one thing that I am reading about Ineos - they (supposedly) understand sport. They will look at the club and see plenty that we can’t see. If they really understand football clubs they will have a better idea than us what the problem is. Sacking the manager only helps if the manager is actually the problem.I'm glad to see someone else have control of the Football side of things. And even though Brailsford is a cheat, he is a sport specialist which I believe matter and Blanc is a sport executive that knows what he is doing both financially but also in terms of the organizational side of things.
And Football is I believe easier than the other sports they invested in, especially when you are involved with a massive Football club that generates enough for his own investments and has enough pull to attract most top level personnel. Things can turn around very quickly in Football if you take a handful of good decisions, one of the big issue with the Glazers and Woodward has been the indecisiveness which is likely the fruit of working with SAF, I mean we have fans who somehow believe that 6 managers in 10 years is a lot or too much.
People should remember that during the same period of time Bayern had 8 different managers(including interims), Real Madrid had 6 different and 7 in total, Juventus had 4 different and 5 in total. Both Milan team have had 10 different managers. Napoli have had 7 different managers. The point being that United are arguably the club that underachieved the most and one of the key issue is the club reluctance to change things quickly which as far as I know is not an issue for Ineos Sport.
The stadium and how it will be funded are strategic and operational issues to be decided by the parties internally so there is no need to announce them with the deal that just outlined the new ownership structure. For all intents and purposes the new co-owners seem to he more preoccupied with sorting the first team.
If my memory serves me correctly, you were predicting week after week that Jassim and Qatar were going to pony up the extra billion needed to get it over the line.
What happened?
Maybe he’ll finally be able to push through the Ron Vlaar deal.
Let’s just say there’s a few glass half empty posters v the glass half full.
That’s the two camps now and I’d rather be in the latter personally. Ho ho ho!
So who is financing any possible loans. Utd can’t and neither are INEOS, as Sir Jim has made clear. So only possible loans would be on Sir Jim personally - but why would he take that on given his wealth?Capital injections are usually handled by the issuance of new shares. Since the money is used by the club, no individual sells their shares. It means everyone will be diluted equally.
He is obligated to inject 300m. The board may approve additional capital injections. He isn’t obligated, but he could inject more if he wanted to and the board agrees.
Also, people are looking at the 300m and laughing, but it’s possible that the 300m will be used as equity for OT renovation and the rest will be financed with loans. Typically, in commercial real estate, 30/70 is common split, they might spend up to 1b on OT.
There is nothing special about 24 months with either of those issues. The debt has been astronomical and rising for 15 years and there was nothing stopping Glazers from keeping it that way for another decade. Same with team and infrastucture. They have been rotting for a long time and as unhealthy as it is, Glazers had the means to continue with it for as long as they believe that it might be worth it for them in the long run.
They never said they would either. It was always a ‘strategic review’ not a straight outright sale. It was the fans and media that got carried away with the notion of a sale.They never wanted to sell you must see that.
Currently he is a minority shareholder with a specific mandate on the football side. Let's see the calibre of Sporting Director he will choose and attract, the coach his team will appoint cause Ten Hag is on the ropes and how things pan out thereafter. That's his stated immediate concern - no point in having a fantastic stadium like Tottenham without the team to play in it.I’ve wanted these clowns gone for 15 years mate and the chance seemed to be finally here. But this deal feels like a complete sham for us fans of the club.
Look I hope to be proven wrong. In the next 12 months Jim might have revealed plans for a OT redevelopment and could have furthered his stake in the club but I’m sceptical to say the least. This deal just suits all parties. Glazers stay, Jim gets a stake with sporting control. Best we’ll get is a new footballing setup but they’ve not even impressed in that regard elsewhere
Im here to be proven wrong I’d fecking love it if I have to apologise down the line
It’s not about ambition, it’s about having the competency and vision to realise those ambitions.
Brighton is a very well run club and I’m sure we could learn from them. It’s not about carbon copying them.
He is only able to be in the UK a certain number of days per year so doubtful.Will ratcliffe be at United game tomorrow now it’s signed, sealed and delivered?
They never said they would either. It was always a ‘strategic review’ not a straight outright sale. It was the fans and media that got carried away with the notion of a sale.
The Glazers have probably been laughing their asses off since last November.
They never said they would either. It was always a ‘strategic review’ not a straight outright sale. It was the fans and media that got carried away with the notion of a sale.
The Glazers have probably been laughing their asses off since last November.
To be fair to Orny, if he just tweeted ‘BUY MY NEWSPAPER’ or ‘CLICK THIS LINK!!!’ He probably wouldn’t get the engagement a big United story does.Even David Ornstein said at the beginning that this could "seismic for Manchester United supporters."
Yes, he'll be doing keepie-uppies on the pitch at halftimeWill ratcliffe be at United game tomorrow now it’s signed, sealed and delivered?
Didn't even notice thatHow does he get the name wrong even when he's f*cking quoting the correct spelling?
How does he get the name wrong even when he's f*cking quoting the correct spelling?
How does he get the name wrong even when he's f*cking quoting the correct spelling?
Maybe it is supposed to be an endearing nickname? Rad-cliffe..Didn't even notice that![]()
According to The Athletic it's 166 million in dividends, I think you are confusing debt (loans/credit lines) with dividends when they are actually completely different things of which only one puts money in their pocketsOver one billion in dividends have been took out mate. One billion
Knighton did it before the game, everyone was like "WTF, who is this plonker"Yes, he'll be doing keepie-uppies on the pitch at halftime
How does he get the name wrong even when he's f*cking quoting the correct spelling?
Even Gary Neville called him Radcliffe in a tweet yesterday, once upon a time I actually lived in Radcliffe!There is an area in Greater Manchester called Radcliffe and it's a common surname with famous people like Daniel Radcliffe and BBC radio presenter Mark Radcliffe from Bolton.
A while back I used to think Sir Jim's surname name was Radcliffe when not really paying attention and him being local.
Why have we continued to spend ridiculous amounts of money, transfer window after window?So why was the debt the first concern about the glazer takeover and the concern that remained even when United were winning league tittles and CL? Let’s not revise history. The level of debt is a major handicap.
All the interest spent over the past 20 years on servicing the debt could have paid for a new stadium, or modernised the current stadium and severely updated Carrington. Also don’t forget £1b has been paid on the servicing the debt and the debt is about the same amount that it was when the glazers put it on the club, sometimes it becomes higher!