Samid
He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
I swear the next stage has been 3-4 weeks away for the past 3-4 months.
Mike Ashley was a business man who had no connection or "love" to Newcastle until he bought them
Obviously the Geordies hate him because he didn't throw his billions in to them, but he did keep them solvent and generally the club was well run as far as I can tell
He would obviously hope to be successful, but bear in mind the Glazers weren't and they are still selling for a massive return, are they not?How is he going to have a return on his investment if the club isn't successful? He won't. Its that simple. It's why the Glazers are selling.
How does what have relevance?
How Ratcliffe came from a council estate in Failsworth to become the UKs richest man.
I'd say the relevance is he knows what the feck he is doing.
Do you think the owners of Asda would have the same interest in a corner shop that they own?How does him already having a club that he's managing poorly not have relevance? I don't know what fantasy land you're living in where you think that doesn't have relevance on him being the owner of United.
The Glazers bought at the right time, just before the football boom.He would obviously hope to be successful, but bear in mind the Glazers weren't and they are still selling for a massive return, are they not?
That is absolute bollocks. I’d argue it’s even more of a reason to stay away. If he can’t run a much smaller club, with much less of an expectation to do well, how on earth is he going to be trusted to run a 5bn + football club mammoth giant like MUFC. I hope he stays far away as possible from owning Man Utd. It’s been shown he can’t do it. TWICE!It's actually because he lives there. Regardless, the notion that he'd run Nice the same way as a ~5b rated club is asinine
If they couldn't run a corner shop well then I certainly wouldn't want them running a multi-billion pound organisation.Do you think the owners of Asda would have the same interest in a corner shop that they own?
That the difference in size and investment.
Smokescreen, man.That’s true. He’s a massive Utd fan, so massive in fact that he’s also a Chelsea season ticket holder.
When the Glazers bought the club it was managed by Fergie on the football side of the club and the board managed the business side. And since Fergie retired they've tried replicating the manager model on the football side of the club with managers who haven't lasted long in the job, which meant responsibility fell on the chief executive at board room level in the absence of a head of football.It will be very, very interesting to see what they do. When Glazers bought the club, it was a well run machine. Quite different now. Would not be surprised if they did a restructure of the management. Would almost be surprised if they did not. Some of the untapped potential at the club is managing it better.
My thoughts on this Ratcliffe thing exactly. You can’t run a club on “passion” alone. He’s shown he can’t do it, with two different clubs now. Please for the love of god, anyone but Ratcliffe.If they couldn't run a corner shop well then I certainly wouldn't want them running a multi-billion pound organisation.
He's running Nice just fine. Two 5th placed finishes and qualified for Europe. People seem to be expecting him to do a PSG.That is absolute bollocks. I’d argue it’s even more of a reason to stay away. If he can’t run a much smaller club, with much less of an expectation to do well, how on earth is he going to be trusted to run a 5bn + football club mammoth giant like MUFC. I hope he stays far away as possible from owning Man Utd. It’s been shown he can’t do it. TWICE!
But could he run Fine just nice?He's running Nice just fine.
Best just to avoid the thread mateThis thread is like Groundhog Day.
Same useless points being argued and recycled by the same posters.
But could he run Fine just nice?
Depends on what you mean, they're weren't broke, their stadium isn't clapped out, he didn't lumber the club with a massive debt, so he used his business to name the ground, no different to City and any other club that sold the stadium naming rights - the only thing he didn't do was pump silly money in to buy tons playersWell run? First time I have heard that in connection with Mike Ashley. He even took the stadium name to promote his own business.
Bloody hell mate.If they couldn't run a corner shop well then I certainly wouldn't want them running a multi-billion pound organisation.
Why? they always bring the fire
I think we'll here from the likes of Bloomberg once something more substantial develops.
That's the key word for me: 'Substantial'. If the FT or Bloomberg had something new, that wasn't just a rehash of old speculation, it probably would have gone to print. Maybe there are a bunch of people lurking in the shadows? It just doesn't come across like that though. Right now it seems like Ineos is the most serious bidder.
Or maybe you want a sugar daddy so you can show him off to all your friends?
They're lurking in the shadows for sure.That's the key word for me: 'Substantial'. If the FT or Bloomberg had something new, that wasn't just a rehash of old speculation, it probably would have gone to print. Maybe there are a bunch of people lurking in the shadows? It just doesn't come across like that though. Right now it seems like Ineos is the most serious bidder.
Nasser Al-Khelaifi is a member of the UEFA Executive Which would probably help when it comes to acquiring another club. He’ll know exactly what to do to make it work
What would it come across like if bids were lurking in the shadows? Every article I’ve read this week from Reuters to the Athletic to the Telegraph have been saying the same thing - full sale the most likely outcome - formal bids middle of Feb with American bids to compete with INEOS and a Middle East bid expected. What are we not hearing that we should be if this wasn’t true?That's the key word for me: 'Substantial'. If the FT or Bloomberg had something new, that wasn't just a rehash of old speculation, it probably would have gone to print. Maybe there are a bunch of people lurking in the shadows? It just doesn't come across like that though. Right now it seems like Ineos is the most serious bidder.
Well run? First time I have heard that in connection with Mike Ashley. He even took the stadium name to promote his own business.
Whoever takes over United is unlikely to be a proven and successful owner of football clubs previously, so doubts will creep in any way.
Feck that's worse than Glazers
Just as EtH unites a large portion of the fan base after years of split due to feelings on managers, it seems as though we’re about to be split again because of new owners.
Our business structure is clearly falling apart, it's why Glazers selling.He would obviously hope to be successful, but bear in mind the Glazers weren't and they are still selling for a massive return, are they not?
Feck that's worse than Glazers
What would it come across like if bids were lurking in the shadows? Every article I’ve read this week from Reuters to the Athletic to the Telegraph have been saying the same thing - full sale the most likely outcome - formal bids middle of Feb with American bids to compete with INEOS and a Middle East bid expected. What are we not hearing that we should be if this wasn’t true?
LA Clippers Ballmer!?!?Can someone who knows more about this US guy Ballmer tell us is he likely to be a similar type owner to Boehly at all
LA Clippers Ballmer!?!?