Your missing a huge important part with an increased stadium effecting FFP , which is now FSP as your revenue grows potentially on a 90,000 stadium by 15,000 extra seats at 25 home games all paying £40 gives you about another £15m in gate receipts call it £25m with merchandising. The revenue goes up to £700m in 2027 from £650m in 2023 - However FSP dictates that you can only spend 70% of that £700m in 2027 but you could have spent 80% £650m in 2023 which year are you better off and able to invest in more players to improve the team?
Not at all.
That is why I said....
"Stadium expenses have nothing to do with FFP, but increased revenue from a larger stadium will."
But a good point re the changes in FSP.
The overall point that i was making though was that i dont see Ratcliffe putting in extra investment only for The Glazers to benefit on the back end - i.e. the price of The Glazers shares increasing on the back of INEOS investment. If he does, then it tells me they have a pre-agreed sale price lined up for the future.
Ratcliffe will brief the media with whatever he thinks will appease the fan base, then if and it’s still an if he takes a minority control he will do the opposite to what he’s promised that’s he’s remit, that’s his track record, I’m yet to see him touch something in the sporting world and it become mega successful!
Let's see on that. I personally dont think he will say much. He will have to play nice with The Glazers. It will be corporate spiel about strategic partnerships, growth opportunities, sporting success blah blah blah. And bank on him saying The Glazers were easy to work with.