jasT1981
Full Member
Surely the FA should block this as a conflict of interests?
What a damn mess.
Is it possible? Yes.How come someone who only owns 25% of shares is taking control of sporting operation?
Man City are not a lower league club yet.
But who will control the budget?
How low can you get for survival, Erik?
Surely the FA should block this as a conflict of interests?
What a damn mess.
Surely the FA should block this as a conflict of interests?
What a damn mess.
It is not speculationIs it possible? Yes.
Is it a given? No, it is speculation.
I might have missed an official statement then.It is not speculation
How do you know it's possible?Is it possible? Yes.
Is it a given? No, it is speculation.
Because it is not illegal??How do you know it's possible?
Tier one reports and multiple credible journalists have said they have knowledge that he has footballing control should he be voted in. You won't hear anything official until the board has voted in and we get more clarity.I might have missed an official statement then.
If you inherited a £500k house would you think selling it for £5k is fine because “hey, anything is profit!”. It’s a ridiculous argument.
Definitely unheard of thoughBecause it is not illegal??
Malcolm Glazer didn't buy United. He didn't have the money to by United, he borrowed money and secured the debt on assets he didn't actually own at the time, that is why it is called a leveraged buy out.
If you need the full details of the buy out, I'm sure they are here somewhere in the archives.
What you also have to look into is the background behind the purchase and how it came about, you might get a few surprises.
Feels an overly pessimistic take for me.In real terms it puts money in the pockets of the Glazers, and will likely result in a bodged paint job to the club infrastructure, so there'll be talk of improvements and expansion of the stadium for a while. This will eventually go quiet and we'll get cheap renovation of the most crumbling section or something.
Rat says he wants footballing control, so I imagine the same old businessmen will remain in charge, but a yes-man will be brought in to be 'Director of Football' in name only, while things continue as normal.
We won't have additional funds to match City by any stretch, but best-case scenario we might get a slightly improved spend this summer to paper over the cracks and make Jimbo look good (until we realise that money came from next summer's spend, next summer).
Basically it's great news! If you're a Glazer.
It's started already.
Talk of 'upgrading' Old Trafford. It doesn't need updating or expanding, it needs pulling down and rebuilt, like the top clubs have done. It's an outdated shitehole.
This just proves exactly what my biggest fears were with this takeover, that it was never going to pan out how it should have done with a clean slate, debt wiped, new owners and United brought up to date heading into a new future.
This is it for me. A fekin sad day when United should have been making a new chapter in its history for the next generation. Instead we're going to be in the exact same position we have been for the past decade, absolutely NOTHING will change.
I'm done. My grandad supported United all his life from 1922. His son, my dad, supported United from 1942 and I've supported them since 1969, but today that ends. When my son was born he immediately got the kit and scarves but for a few years he's had a lot of stick at school for being a United supporter. Well this weekend he actually told me he wants to support Arsenal. In the past I'd have said no chance son, but I just said sure and ordered him the Arsenal kit.
This saga has done me. I'm not wasting my time on these parasites anymore and Ratcliffe isn't the future of United.
United are done as a top club. Fact.
Agreed. Reading this thread I honestly think this might be one of the biggest misconceptions on the caf. The Glazers don't seem to do anything directly, they appoint a figurehead they trust and then, by all accounts, aren't involved in the day to day or how we operate. They care about the financial performance and have control of budgets but the issues we face as a club are decisions made by others. They are enablers, that is for sure, and ultimately choose the CEO but they are completely disinterested outside of the numbers. Even if Sir Jim is average, having at least a whiff of an interest in actually how we operate will be an improvement.Haven't we outspent City over the last decade? Honestly if Ratcliffe just gives a modicum of a toss about us then it'll be a significant improvement.
Not his remit at Southampton, Tottenham and Monaco though, is it?
Southampton and Spurs did have their highest finishes in Premier League history when he was at the club, and Monaco if I'm not mistaken were top when he left (though I could be wrong, and his Monaco stint wasnt all roses to say the least).
He doesn't run them, he makes the decisions, just like anyone else who runs large corporationsAs a 70 year old, how will he manage INEOS’s core business plus sporting interests in cycling, Mercedes F1 team, two footballing clubs etc and one of the biggest football clubs in the world?
Surely the FA should block this as a conflict of interests?
What a damn mess.
Especially when it is a new multi use venue.Good luck trying to get Levy and Co to sell their cash cow for less than your failed United bid.
Will really show how interested you was in buying our club.
Haven't we outspent City over the last decade? Honestly if Ratcliffe just gives a modicum of a toss about us then it'll be a significant improvement.
Is it possible? Yes.
Is it a given? No, it is speculation.
You don't really know the capacity Mitchell would join at - but generally speaking if he was capable of collaborating with his peers and help getting the likes of VVD, Mane, Alderweirald, Vertonghen, Son at their pomp (all good enough to play for a title winning team in their own right) then you'd imagine he's good at identifying a solid player or two.Your right but then what makes you think he would be good at United if he’s never had this level of club. We require a different level of player at this level. As I’ve said already I don’t want the direct who picks out the new Caicedo. I want the direct who identifies Rodri. We need players that will have immediate impact at the top level with the right age profile.
Monaco from reports wasn’t that impressive and they have improved since he’s left. I was all for Mitchell years ago but I think we can do a lot better and we are setting our sites at has bins with no actual real credibility at the top top level or recent success.
The Athletic podcast is very informative.
Ratcliffe wants to turn Utd into a winning machine.
Anyone who follows F1 - he’s very similar to Christian Horner who turned Red Bull into consistent champions.
Man Utd are huge. Absolutely gigantic. We just need someone who is serious about football running the show, which is about to happen.
Oh and by the way - your saviour and hero, Jassim, wouldn’t pay the cash to buy us. Jim offered more money and has carefully researched the requirements to acquire the club long term. I’d rather have a strategist in charge than a state who might just want to turn us into a soulless entity like PSG.
Especially when it is a new multi use venue.
It's started already.
Talk of 'upgrading' Old Trafford. It doesn't need updating or expanding, it needs pulling down and rebuilt, like the top clubs have done. It's an outdated shitehole.
This just proves exactly what my biggest fears were with this takeover, that it was never going to pan out how it should have done with a clean slate, debt wiped, new owners and United brought up to date heading into a new future.
This is it for me. A fekin sad day when United should have been making a new chapter in its history for the next generation. Instead we're going to be in the exact same position we have been for the past decade, absolutely NOTHING will change.
I'm done. My grandad supported United all his life from 1922. His son, my dad, supported United from 1942 and I've supported them since 1969, but today that ends. When my son was born he immediately got the kit and scarves but for a few years he's had a lot of stick at school for being a United supporter. Well this weekend he actually told me he wants to support Arsenal. In the past I'd have said no chance son, but I just said sure and ordered him the Arsenal kit.
This saga has done me. I'm not wasting my time on these parasites anymore and Ratcliffe isn't the future of United.
United are done as a top club. Fact.
LuckyScout78 has entered the chat
The shock when our academy starts feeding NiceThe Nice connection could be good. France have a history of bringing through some great players we should be aiming for the best young prospects from within France and world football and using Nice to help develop those players.
It would all be subject to board approval. Given the yes men/people at the club, I doubt many would revolt against Murtough or Fletcher. Ratcliffe taking over football operations is a pitch to the board nothing more.
People keep quoting city because they serve as an outstanding example of excellent business, sporting and community success.
I’m not a city fan, just a lower league football supporter who takes an interest in the upper echelons of the game, and I can tell you with absolute conviction that it’s only fans of the clubs who rival city (the dippers with their empire built on earnings from the mystery of gambling especially), the supporters of those clubs who tried to keep new investment out of football to protect the dominance of their cartel, who see city as having broken any kind of moral code.
And anyhow, the billion charges (as ridiculous as they are) are still nothing but charges and the only conviction they ever received under ffp was for being slow to engage with a process that had changed some rules that had been complied with but were then changed after the fact.
In all fairness, the Utd fans who understand how the system works (the vast majority of them, which is what makes this forum such a joy) don’t engage on the topic in the poorly informed way that you have because clever people who live in glass houses are clued up enough to not throw stuff, it’s only the occasional duffer who spouts your line nowadays mate.
And outside of the supporters of the cartel clubs almost all supporters see ffp and unproven charges for exactly what they are.
All depends on how much money everyone is getting.It would all be subject to board approval. Given the yes men/people at the club, I doubt many would revolt against Murtough or Fletcher. Ratcliffe taking over football operations is a pitch to the board nothing more.
You don't really know the capacity Mitchell would join at - but generally speaking if he was capable of getting the likes of VVD, Mane, Alderweirald, Vertonghen, Son at their pomp (all good enough to play for a title winning team in their own right) then you'd imagine he's good at identifying a solid player or two.
Your Rodri point is a bit bizarre, he was a known quantity in football. He also joined a well oiled machine which makes his transition mountains easier than Caceido.
Re. his Monaco stint, as I say it wasn't a bed of roses but you'll struggle to find a footballing head who hasn't struggled.
Don't need to imagine it, what you describe will almost certainly be the case whoever is in charge
What do you mean?It would all be subject to board approval. Given the yes men/people at the club, I doubt many would revolt against Murtough or Fletcher. Ratcliffe taking over football operations is a pitch to the board nothing more.
I believe at least 75% of the board need to vote in favor for it to be approved and there are 11 people on the board which are the 6 Glazers plus Sir Alex, Sir Bobby, David Gill, Richard Arnold, and John Edelson.