klsv
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2016
- Messages
- 1,946
Just looked up this Jean Claude Blanc guy. It's just Jim's french alter ego isn't it?
Many dresses are made up of petrochemicals. Polymer is everywhere
How would one wear petrochemicals??
Sir Dave Brailsford, the former head of British Cycling and INEOS Grenadiers before becoming Ratcliffe’s director of sport in late 2021, would be expected to head up the sporting operation at United.
With Sir Dave Brailsford heading up the Sporting Operation at United - not too sure about that.This all sounds quite good as well
Can't wait for this shit to be over.. bring on Thursday..
Glad its not Qatar..
It's crazy how so many on here are clueless about so much and yet they try to make fun of others when they point out their ignorance.Seriously? The vast majority of your clothes are derived from petrochemicals.
Do City pay their owners or is the value as a plaything?
i thought it was his French born cousinJust looked up this Jean Claude Blanc guy. It's just Jim's french alter ego isn't it?
Well the richest man in Britain just bought 25% of us and we turn over 709.18 million a year and fill the stadium every week, so yes. We are one of those "poors."So we’re still one of the poors?
Literally his MO.How so? Because I am reading the reports from today and think Ratcliffe is making more astute decisions?
Compared to Goldbridge, who literally makes things up and calls people a prat for pointing out where he's wrong
Believe me if I had the money to buy United and was a childhood United fan like Jassim apparently is, I would try everything to buy the club, even if it meant to first part own it. Now maybe Jassim has tried to do this too and I missed the news, but I have only read so far that he wants 100% immediately or nothing. Nothing it is then. Fine with me.I love how words like "amateur" are thrown around like you're some kinda successful billionaire yourself You make it sound it was a very easy thing to do and he cocked it up
It's not clear how much investing in maintaining and improving the existing infrstructure would add though, really. The share price likely already contains expectations of investment, which has to be funded somehow (which caused the immediate need for outside investment to start with). If it's done via (for example) low rate loans from Ineos then Ineos make the return on that, whilst getting 25% of the capital growth caused if it's over and above the expectation already in the price they paid. Most of the share value is going to be predicated on expected future returns from media and so on, with a functional asset base as a given. That benefits the club (cheaper debt than open market), helps the infrastructure and the asset value isn't diminished, although not likely hugely raised.Ineos planning to invest in the stadium and training facilities makes zero sense when you plan on owning all of the club in the future. Why invest making the assets go up.in value when you plan on buying the last 3/4? This stinks to high heaven
Basically by being a full kit wanker.
With Sir Dave Brailsford heading up the Sporting Operation at United - not too sure about that.
At least our doping will finally be on City and Liverpool's level.
Ineos planning to invest in the stadium and traing facilities makes zero sense when you plan on owning all of the club in the future. Why invest making the assets go up.in value when you plan on buying the last 3/4? This stinks to high heaven
I'm having a 'hissy fit' because the club's ethos built up by SAF of competing to win is dead in the water. We've gone from a scary club to a laughing stock in the past years. With this, we're truly on the path of fallen giant.
Not because some rando from Qatar didn't take over. If we got a Boehly (who despite his issues has spent the money and even wanted to build a new stadium) or if Ratcliffe took over 100%, that'd be acceptable.
However, I cannot and will not stomach a ruse like the one Ratcliffe has pulled off where the future of the club is in limbo, just so he can get to play with United, while the parasites stay and enrich themselves further.
I have learned my lesson in the past on empty promises and propaganda from people like Ratcliffe. You can feel free to believe him but that won't change the reality.
Ineos planning to invest in the stadium and traing facilities makes zero sense when you plan on owning all of the club in the future. Why invest making the assets go up.in value when you plan on buying the last 3/4? This stinks to high heaven
Ineos planning to invest in the stadium and traing facilities makes zero sense when you plan on owning all of the club in the future. Why invest making the assets go up.in value when you plan on buying the last 3/4? This stinks to high heaven
Im disappointed that the strong 92F bid is apparently off the table and find it very weird that some United fans are happy that the group who wanted to clear our debts, sort out the stadium and get rid of the Glazers are gone.
Now it seems we are left with Sir Jim's minority investment deal. Obviously it's difficult to get excited about this but there are at least some positive noises coming out regarding structural changes and potential stadium renovation. It's all just PR bluster at the moment but better than nothing I suppose.
Until we see some real details it's difficult to judge and I wouldn't hold my breath on this deal getting done anytime soon either.
Chill out. It’s a forum with different opinions. It’s fair to see his confusion and you could debate it. Without just saying go away.Why don't you just go away then. Being confused about people having moralistic tendencies just makes people think you aren't the nicest, for your information.
Ineos planning to invest in the stadium and traing facilities makes zero sense when you plan on owning all of the club in the future. Why invest making the assets go up.in value when you plan on buying the last 3/4? This stinks to high heaven
Im disappointed that the QATARI STATE bid is apparently off the table and find it very weird that some United fans are happy that the group who wanted to clear our debts, sort out the stadium and get rid of the Glazers are gone.
Now it seems we are left with Sir Jim's minority investment deal. Obviously it's difficult to get excited about this but there are at least some positive noises coming out regarding structural changes and potential stadium renovation. It's all just PR bluster at the moment but better than nothing I suppose.
Until we see some real details it's difficult to judge and I wouldn't hold my breath on this deal getting done anytime soon either.
No one serious about being the next custodian of United would offer so much of other peoples money to allow the Glazers to maintain control.
Fixed that for you.Being confused about people having "selective" moralistic tendencies just makes people think you aren't the nicest, for your information.
You're fun.You just don't get it yet do you. United are finished. What you are 'hoping' for won't happen with a 25% minority stake.
This hasn't been a sale, it's been nothing more than a few shares being bought. This stuff happens at companies day-in and day-out. Ratcliffe won't be pumping billions into the club to get it to where it should be as a minority shareholder.
Supporters like you are going to be very, very disappointed over the next ten years when the penny finally drops we're a mid-table team, once and for all.
Young kids don't give a sh*t about history or the Busby Babes, or Munich. Those days are long gone. They are only interested in who's winning, who's at the top and United won't be at the top anymore.
I live near the Essex/London border and I can tell you that once you get past the Spurs, Arsenal and West Ham kits you see on kids, the next ones are City's and Real Madrid. You barely see United shirts anymore and that wasn't the case 10 years ago.
Ratcliffe is too old to get United back to where it needs/should be. Its already too late. There are several clubs ahead of us that have forged on years ago and we aren't catching them up in the next ten years with Ratcliffes minority stake and the Glazers still pulling the strings.
Welcome to your reality check.
No. We will bid for 25% of Mbappe. He will play a quarter of the next season with us.So with Jim taking over does this mean Mbappe is off the table?
Chill out. It’s a forum with different opinions. It’s fair to see his confusion and you could debate it. Without just saying go away.
You're fun.
I don't know where I said I expected any of those things to happen. I'm glad we aren't being soaked in oil money and hope the Glazers feck off ASAP.
I'd rather support my club in mid table than watch us win champions leagues as a play thing of some Sheik.
That's my opinion. You're welcome to yours.
Of course he's going to be involved. He's head director of INEOS Sports. Jean-Claude Blanc and Rob Nevin are also expected to have important roles.Brailsford going to have a key role. Still mates rates. What’s worse is he failed at Nice.
--> Staff will be cut
--> Murtough and Arnold might be dead men walking
--> Board will be restructured to give the INEOS members control to for sporting autonomy
--> Paul Mitchell looks likely - Michael Edwards admired but unclear if he's open for a PL return.
--> Jean-Claude Blanc could be the CEO
From The Athletic:
" Ratcliffe wants control of sporting decisions immediately and is proposing a new structure where INEOS representatives have seats on the board, thus granting definitive influence on such matters. But the exact nature of this arrangement still needs to be worked out. Ratcliffe is not concerned with having oversight on United’s commercial arm straightaway, but he has been negotiating the mechanism for eventually buying the majority of shares and completing a full takeover.
It is anticipated that Ratcliffe would wish to make his own appointments on the football side and plans have been discussed.
Paul Mitchell, who has left his role as Monaco’s sporting director and moved back home to Manchester, is thought to be under consideration. Mitchell established his reputation for recruitment work at Southampton, Tottenham Hotspur and RB Leipzig and has a good relationship with senior INEOS figures. Monaco were top of Ligue 1 when he left after what was regarded as a successful transfer window and the building of a new management setup.
Michael Edwards and Julian Ward, who enjoyed success in helping build Liverpool’s squad under Jurgen Klopp, have been discussed, but it is unclear if either is open to a Premier League return imminently. United held talks with Dan Ashworth before he took up the position as Newcastle United’s sporting director and any approach would now cost significant money in compensation. There is speculation about what any restructuring would mean for football director John Murtough, with Ratcliffe tending to want his own people in positions of power.
Sir Dave Brailsford, the former head of British Cycling and INEOS Grenadiers before becoming Ratcliffe’s director of sport in late 2021, would be expected to head up the sporting operation at United.
The position of Richard Arnold as United’s chief executive would come into doubt should Ratcliffe succeed. Jean-Claude Blanc, the former Paris Saint-Germain chief executive who joined INEOS in February, is a potential candidate to step in. Ratcliffe, who toured Old Trafford and the training ground at Carrington in March, is said to feel that United’s operation can be more streamlined given the club employs more than 1,000 staff members. "