Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
How is a club's value determined? Is it just a case of supply and demand? How is it possible that a club like Liverpool is being sold for £3bn and United, with all its developmental requirements, for more than double that?
 
How is a club's value determined? Is it just a case of supply and demand? How is it possible that a club like Liverpool is being sold for £3bn and United, with all its developmental requirements, for more than double that?
not entirely sure about clubs, but most companies are sold based on a multiple of their EIBITDA. Normally this can be 5-10 times but in exceptional cases more.
 
How is a club's value determined? Is it just a case of supply and demand? How is it possible that a club like Liverpool is being sold for £3bn and United, with all its developmental requirements, for more than double that?

one reason is United has more fans
 
How is a club's value determined? Is it just a case of supply and demand? How is it possible that a club like Liverpool is being sold for £3bn and United, with all its developmental requirements, for more than double that?
Why do Primark sell dresses at £15 and Versace sell dresses at £15,000?
 
Imagine the wives of these billionaires asking their husbands to pick up some milk down the shop, only for them to buy a football club, completely forgetting the milk.

In fairness, that sounds like something I'd do...without the billionaire part. I'm not even a thousandth-aire.
 
Talkshite reporting on minority investment from Qatar for Liverpool.

Interesting
 
Isn’t that shit for them?
Depends how you look at it.
Qatar probably morally terrible owners on one hand.

Liverpool always were looking for investment not a whole sale but a minority takeover will probably lead to a full takeover.

In this instance I would say we can rule out Qatar unless they have another consortium available to buy us.
 
We are not worth 7billion and the Glazers are delusional if they think they can flog us for that much. It's putting off potential buyers.
 
Depends how you look at it.
Qatar probably morally terrible owners on one hand.

Liverpool always were looking for investment not a whole sale but a minority takeover will probably lead to a full takeover.

In this instance I would say we can rule out Qatar unless they have another consortium available to buy us.
Yeah but they can’t take over Liverpool while owning PSG so it’ll only ever be a minority stake. They still keep FSG who won’t put any money in while there has to be a natural limit to how much Qatar puts in themselves.
If Liverpool fans do get excited about a taste of ME money then Qatar being a minority stake keeps the potential full takeover of that nature from happening.
Seems like a halfway house. I’d be raging if this happened with the Glazers
 
Yeah but they can’t take over Liverpool while owning PSG so it’ll only ever be a minority stake. They still keep FSG who won’t put any money in while there has to be a natural limit to how much Qatar puts in themselves.
If Liverpool fans do get excited about a taste of ME money then Qatar being a minority stake keeps the potential full takeover of that nature from happening.
Seems like a halfway house. I’d be raging if this happened with the Glazers

FSG aren't the Glazers though. They know how to run a club and they are genuinely invested in it
 
Yeah but they can’t take over Liverpool while owning PSG so it’ll only ever be a minority stake. They still keep FSG who won’t put any money in while there has to be a natural limit to how much Qatar puts in themselves.
If Liverpool fans do get excited about a taste of ME money then Qatar being a minority stake keeps the potential full takeover of that nature from happening.
Seems like a halfway house. I’d be raging if this happened with the Glazers
I think the Qataris will end up chucking PSG in the bin. Even signing the best players in the World they have obviously realised that the interest isn't there and it's difficult to build a CL winning squad in France where there are no competitive matches to keep the players sharp. A sportswashing project with United or Liverpool is on a different planet, you can go anywhere in the World and people know these clubs.

I hope it's not true, ideally we'd have no state takeovers in football. But with Newcastle, City and Liverpool all potentially swimming in unlimited funds over the next decade and more, the top 3 will basically become a closed shop.
 
Yeah but they can’t take over Liverpool while owning PSG so it’ll only ever be a minority stake. They still keep FSG who won’t put any money in while there has to be a natural limit to how much Qatar puts in themselves.
If Liverpool fans do get excited about a taste of ME money then Qatar being a minority stake keeps the potential full takeover of that nature from happening.
Seems like a halfway house. I’d be raging if this happened with the Glazers
It’s not Qatar state , it’s said to be a Qatar backed consortium. Big difference with no ownership ties to PSG
 
Funny that a large part of the Chelsea purchase cost was the huge debt owing to Abramovich, which massively overinflated the final figure, without the debts Chelsea would have probably been valued at half, I am sure that the financial stratosphere of billionaires is better versed in these things but our value and Liverpools seems to be being inflated by the media based on the total Chelsea sale cost which was perverse
 
I recognise his name and I have him blocked. Which means I realised he was a BS account somewhere along the way

Although I do think Dubai will be one of the bidders

Yep, an ITK account. I remember someone posted him saying FDJ is a United player. So clearly wants likes and retweets because we have seen alot of ITK accounts saying takeover is complete.

I find it funny that ITK's think that anyone would tell them if its done, considering this is not a transfer or something, its a £5-8bn takeover where only people who need to know will have any idea what is going on.
 
Something to keep in mind: a “good deal” is a very subjective matter. What someone at United now thinks is a good deal could be paltry, not properly image oriented, or simply a poor relationship to the new buyers.

You want to have them as few entanglements as possible.

One of the things that made Chelsea so easy to sell was that aside from complete debt forgiveness they were wiped clean to the point they barely had toilet paper in the building.

Clearlake probably would have liked to select the shirt sponsor as well if given the choice.

Raine is VERY good at matching up people and n terms of their adequacy to the task of ownership. If the Glazers and the different United groups would just say “get us a ton of money and the best possible owners” …. They would do a good job.

They he only caveat in this is that they work under the criteria given to them. So… if they are told “biggest check wins” … that’s what they’ll do (simplified example).

If the Glazers do the right thing and tell them to heavily consider multiple criteria like dedication to future investment in the club, commitment to the club on competitive levels, erasing current debt and structuring all future debt in a way the doesn’t hamper club business… that would be ideal.

If I were a United fan that would be the campaign I would be waging right now; not that the owners come from certain countries, or that they made their money in soy beans instead of oil.

Demand, for all they’ve taken from you, and all they WILL make from this sale, that the least they owe you is finding super rich buyers dedicated to making United the premiere team on the planet and will settle for nothing less.

Top man, agree completely.
 
Something to keep in mind: a “good deal” is a very subjective matter. What someone at United now thinks is a good deal could be paltry, not properly image oriented, or simply a poor relationship to the new buyers.

You want to have them as few entanglements as possible.

One of the things that made Chelsea so easy to sell was that aside from complete debt forgiveness they were wiped clean to the point they barely had toilet paper in the building.

Clearlake probably would have liked to select the shirt sponsor as well if given the choice.

Raine is VERY good at matching up people and n terms of their adequacy to the task of ownership. If the Glazers and the different United groups would just say “get us a ton of money and the best possible owners” …. They would do a good job.

They he only caveat in this is that they work under the criteria given to them. So… if they are told “biggest check wins” … that’s what they’ll do (simplified example).

If the Glazers do the right thing and tell them to heavily consider multiple criteria like dedication to future investment in the club, commitment to the club on competitive levels, erasing current debt and structuring all future debt in a way the doesn’t hamper club business… that would be ideal.

If I were a United fan that would be the campaign I would be waging right now; not that the owners come from certain countries, or that they made their money in soy beans instead of oil.

Demand, for all they’ve taken from you, and all they WILL make from this sale, that the least they owe you is finding super rich buyers dedicated to making United the premiere team on the planet and will settle for nothing less.
Nobody but the Glazers has any say, and it will be 'biggest cheque wins', the rest is irrelevant in terms of who might own us. Sad, but that's the reality.
 
We are ending with a US consortium aren't we?

Almost sure of it. And probably not good ones either. After the initial optimism (And I am still glad we will hopefully get rid of the Glazers), I can't help but feel like we will end up with owners who are not much better than them.
 
Almost sure of it. And probably not good ones either. After the initial optimism (And I am still glad we will hopefully get rid of the Glazers), I can't help but feel like we will end up with owners who are not much better than them.
I am in no doubt that the Glazer's number one priority will be to make as much money as they can, will not matter who or where from.

As a bonus to that I am sure that given several similar options they would take the deal which is worst for the club out of spite.
 
I am in no doubt that the Glazer's number one priority will be to make as much money as they can, will not matter who or where from.

As a bonus to that I am sure that given several similar options they would take the deal which is worst for the club out of spite.
I agree with the first part. As for the second part, they are businessmen and frankly they won't go so far as to feck over the club which will probably make them billions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.