DOTA
wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
She’s only here to remind you of the mess Woodward left when he went away.
She’s only here to remind you of the mess Woodward left when he went away.
Even that doesn’t make sense. They’d make the difference back in interest if they take Qatar bid now.
But unless it’s a lot more than Qatar then surely the interest builds up from cashing out now to similar, if not more, than Jim’s bid to buy them out in 2/3 years?What doesn't make sense? They stand to make more money going with Jim as things stand. They might just have to wait for the money but I'm sure that's not really an issue for them. Fairly sure they will survive
There is a lot of risk involved in waiting 2/3 years. Getting the money as cash now is potentially a lot more attractive to them. If Qatar offer a price that is relatively close then they will be the preferred option.What doesn't make sense? They stand to make more money going with Jim as things stand. They might just have to wait for the money but I'm sure that's not really an issue for them. Fairly sure they will survive
The Alanis Morrissette references will never get old.
Not if there is a minimum guaranteed price in the contract as has been suggested.There is a lot of risk involved in waiting 2/3 years.
Suggested by who?Not if there is a minimum guaranteed price in the contract as has been suggested.
They’ve inflated the lower 50% offer to gain the upper hand. I don’t think Ratcliffe has any intention of buying more than he needs to currently.Ratcliffe/Ineos won't have just randomly offered a partial buyout as an option, it is obviously a reaction to something either said or implied in the process, since they do have a bid in place for the 69% (same as Qatar) too.
If the 5th offer from the Qataris still can't match what Ineos are offering then there is something clearly faulty with that particular magic money tree.
It was reported when the third offers went in. SJR is proposing to pay a premium for J&A shares in 1 or 2 years. Admittedly not sure how that would work with the 3rd year put and call.Suggested by who?
I think this is correct. He’s always said he would buy a bit with a view to a full takeover in the future.I don’t think Ratcliffe has any intention of buying more than he needs to currently.
I don’t recall anything being said about a minimum or maximum price. To my understanding it would be a premium on top of the current share price which is of course a big risk. As soon as Ratcliffe buys the club the share price will plummet as it’s already inflated due to the potential of a Qatar buyout. It’s worth more to the Glazers by taking the lump sum from Qatar now.It was reported when the third offers went in. SJR is proposing to pay a premium for J&A shares in 1 or 2 years. Admittedly not sure how that would work with the 3rd year put and call.
It was reported as a premium above the offer price INEOS made, not share price.I don’t recall anything being said about a minimum or maximum price. To my understanding it would be a premium on top of the current share price which is of course a big risk. As soon as Ratcliffe buys the club the share price will plummet as it’s already inflated due to the potential of a Qatar buyout. It’s worth more to the Glazers by taking the lump sum from Qatar now.
That’s not how I recall it. You’re welcome to prove me wrong here.It was reported as a premium above the offer price INEOS made, not share price.
Doesn't matter how layered the Ratcliffe proposal is, all that ultimately matters to the Glazers is a full and massive upfront payment so they can cash out with as much as possible, I think they will accept the next proposal from Qatar, indeed to the Glazers, cash has always been king.
I’ll link you later when I have a minute to find it.That’s not how I recall it. You’re welcome to prove me wrong here.
It will be a $x premium per share + Share price at the time
Ratcliffe/Ineos won't have just randomly offered a partial buyout as an option, it is obviously a reaction to something either said or implied in the process, since they do have a bid in place for the 69% (same as Qatar) too.
If the 5th offer from the Qataris still can't match what Ineos are offering then there is something clearly faulty with that particular magic money tree.
this shit has to get done in the next week or two in order to have an opportunity this summer to really help Erik in the transfer window
There has to be a sale of some kind. Don’t think it’s financially viable for the Glazers anymore without some sort of investment.IF we don't get anything in days after Cup Final then even I will start to doubt a sale
£5.5-5.7bn is more than Radcliffe, cleaner and less convoluted with the put and call offer, it’s seriously messy, plus the Glazers also own A shares and would receive a premium on those, rumoured to be 1.5% to 4.25% it’s hard to say as some of the Glazers have cashed out sone shares. A Full sale is the cleanest and doesn’t mean that the all100% of the shares have to be sold in 4-6 weeks, they can offer a premium for Class B Voting shares and then a smaller premium for Class A shares in October or November.Why do I get the feeling this still won't reach what Ratcliffe is offering them in total so what's the point in making it
Last seasons shirts half price, profits straight into Glazer pockets.There has to be a sale of some kind. Don’t think it’s financially viable for the Glazers anymore without some sort of investment.
Definitely feels like the Glazers using Jimmy to squeeze the Qataris for every penny and it is also logical why Qatar didn't bid up to what they probably are willing to upfront.
From the beginning, the story has been the Glazers want $7-8bn for the club.It does seem that is the case, probably because how complicated a layered takeover would be, it seems they are smoking out the Qataris for a final 5th Bid to try and get £5.5/5.7 billion final offer.
Agree. Ratcliffe has already done well out of it probably, his abs the INEOS name has been in the headlines for a long time in a mostly positive light.I've been saying for months this would happen and it's exactly what's happening. Wouldn't be suprised if Jimmy gets a payoff at the end for services rendered. Ultimately the Qataris can pretend to be business people looking for value for money but the truth is they are a bottomless money pit looking for prestige and everyone knows it. So the job of the Raine Group is to strip that pretence away but not go so hard that they walk away.
Next Monday is somewhat optimistic but I hope so.From the beginning, the story has been the Glazers want $7-8bn for the club.
The lower end of that in £s is 5.67bn and the higher 6.5bn at today's exchange rate, so I tend to agree with this.
Let's hope Qatar get this done by next Monday and we can actually start looking forward to next season proper.
£5.5-5.7bn is more than Radcliffe, cleaner and less convoluted with the put and call offer, it’s seriously messy, plus the Glazers also own A shares and would receive a premium on those, rumoured to be 1.5% to 4.25% it’s hard to say as some of the Glazers have cashed out sone shares. A Full sale is the cleanest and doesn’t mean that the all100% of the shares have to be sold in 4-6 weeks, they can offer a premium for Class B Voting shares and then a smaller premium for Class A shares in October or November.
Currently the rumoured bid from SJ is £5.6 billion but £800m is for training ground upgrades, Stadium and squad development do the true offer is £4.8bn, that’s simply not enough, I think £5.5bn is enough but we’ll see ?
No, probably not because there is reportedly only a $300 million difference on valuation currentlyStone tweet gives me hope he will come back with another offer,however is he going to push it up by £700m is the question
I've been saying for months this would happen and it's exactly what's happening. Wouldn't be suprised if Jimmy gets a payoff at the end for services rendered. Ultimately the Qataris can pretend to be business people looking for value for money but the truth is they are a bottomless money pit looking for prestige and everyone knows it. So the job of the Raine Group is to strip that pretence away but not go so hard that they walk away.
No, probably not because there is reportedly only a $300 million difference on valuation currently
I don’t think anything is really pointing to anything currently. It’s pretty much deadlocked.So when do you see it swinging conclusively in Qatar’s favour because everything right now is still pointing to Ratcliffe
Don’t think so. If he matches it then it’s a far better offer than Ratcliffe because it’s all up front cash.He will have to get in front of Ratcliffe valuation
I don’t think anything is really pointing to anything currently. It’s pretty much deadlocked.
Don’t think so. If he matches it then it’s a far better offer than Ratcliffe because it’s all up front cash.
Ratcliffe/Ineos won't have just randomly offered a partial buyout as an option, it is obviously a reaction to something either said or implied in the process, since they do have a bid in place for the 69% (same as Qatar) too.
If the 5th offer from the Qataris still can't match what Ineos are offering then there is something clearly faulty with that particular magic money tree.
At this stage probably.Will he though?
It does seem that is the case, probably because how complicated a layered takeover would be, it seems they are smoking out the Qataris for a final 5th Bid to try and get £5.5/5.7 billion final offer.
At this stage probably.
Then technically he is at fault for fecking over our summer because he decided to play games with the Glazers. Especially if he could've afforded it from the start.At this stage probably.