Nickelodeon
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2015
- Messages
- 2,519
Genuine question because I’m completely clueless on this stuff. How does the debt we have affect us? We should obviously have never had it in the first place, the way the Glazers took over shouldn’t be allowed.
I just don’t know how it actually affects us, does it hamper our ability to sign players with FFP?
The debt itself is not the major problem. The issue with Glazers and debts is that they bought the club and put the buying amount debt on the club. The debt was supposed to be finished by now but instead it has increased. The club's spending becomes hamstrung because of interest payments. While this isn't so evident in our transfer business, there has been very little infrastructure development. So much so that Old Trafford hasn't been considered in the 10 stadiums for the Euro 2028 bid. Clubs like Spurs and Man City have better stadiums and training facilities than us now. While success on the pitch is dependent on more factors than the owners, from an infrastructure point of view, there is no reason why we are where we are off the pitch. And on top of that, Glazers are picking up massive dividends that the amount have now earned in dividends is more than the initial amount they bought the club for.
From an FFP perspective, debt leads to interest payments which forms a component in our P&L. Ultimately, it would be better from an FFP perspective if we didn't have the debt but its not our biggest problem. Our problem is leeches who have already:
- Earned more money than they initially borrowed to buy the club
- While the club has more debt than ever
- While being behind the other clubs in every footballing and infrastructural metric