Kinsella
Copy & Paste Merchant
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2012
- Messages
- 3,245
Like the Hokey Cokey.Yeah Glazers Out! Or Glazers In, whatever, just not as a minority shareholder.
Like the Hokey Cokey.Yeah Glazers Out! Or Glazers In, whatever, just not as a minority shareholder.
Gas?
Ratcliffe's revised proposal would see Ineos take over the running of the club while spending on new players, sports science and improvements to Old Trafford and the Carrington training ground. Avram and Joel would step down from their executive roles, yet retain an inside seat to assess the effectiveness of the Ineos-led overhaul. As a condition of the takeover agreement, it is understood that the pair would be granted options to sell their shares – at a premium to the current bid price – after year one and year two of Ineos' stewardship; or to retain their minority ownership indefinitely.
The Qatari offer is understood to have been approved by both Paris Saint-Germain president Nasser Al-Khelaifi and the Emir of Qatar, Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani. If successful, United would be placed at the helm of a multi-club network alongside PSG and Sporting Braga. In addition to its ownership of PSG and recently acquired minority stake in Liga Portugal's Braga, Qatar Sports Investments is working on adding further European clubs to its portfolio.
They have crippled us with debt and taken enough money out of the club for their own profit, infact they have taken more than they have spent. Enough infact, to have build a new stadium and invested in the infrastructure. They have taken Manchester Uniteds money. Our money, the fans money. How much of their own money have they spent on the club? 0. And that includes buying it. They should never of been allowed to buy us because they cannot afford it! They have ruined us and that’s a fact. Yes they have spent money but it’s united money to buy players with! Them spending it badly shows how clueless they are. That’s all it shows.
No, you asked why they’re so rich and I said gas. They’re the third highest producer of gas in the world, that’s why they’re rich.Gas and oil. The production of which is not good for the planet either so that argument is gone straight away.
So both bidders are bad for the planet and one is a terrible human rights abusing regime.
Next argument.....
Duncan Castles article
Yep. Like i said, assume the figure you read in the papers is massive inflated and the vast majority of the rest is tied up.Think folks look at somebodies wealth and presume it is all in money. Might be in all sorts of commodities.
The Qatari offer is understood to have been approved by both Paris Saint-Germain president Nasser Al-Khelaifi and the Emir of Qatar, Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani.
Musk had to borrow £13bn to be Twitter despite his rumoured net worth and the value of his companies. This idea Ratcliffe can afford to fund £4bn to pay outright for United isn't living in the team world
Man who's "net worth" was $183bn had to borrow heavily to buy an asset for $44bn.
Someone who has a "net worth" of £13bn will definitely have to borrow to buy something anywhere near the £4bn mark
It's absurd to suggest otherwise. Else it's a huge misunderstanding of what 'net worth' actually means. It doesn't mean in the bank. And money tied up in other business likely will stay there. Why would be divest money from Ineos which is far more likely to be far more profitable than we'll ever be
I don't recall seeing many doing thisThat puts it to bed then, so we can stop pretending Jassim is a ‘private businessman’.
No state-ownership of Manchester United. Hashtag that millennials!!
Just wait until UEFA formally allows owners to own multiple clubs. I also believe that in 12 months time these idiots will be more desperate
However as said I prefer Elliott to ineos so. .
after all this time how can you still not know that SJR isn't using his personal wealth to buy United?
It’s sad to see how inculcated football has become to the idea of multi-club ownership in football.Duncan Castles article
Have you read some of the personal accounts of workers for the Qatari World Cup?Here we go again with the baseless propaganda. Do you know how many people die on uk construction sites a year?
Last year 1008 Americans died on construction sites.
Construction is dangerous. It always will be - all effort must be taken to protect people on work sites.
Qatar carried out a LOT of work for the world cup. It was done in a relatively short time too.
It wasn't like it was state sponsored execution of brickies.
Elliott is not in the running any more people. They are under investigation for fraud.The current bidders already own other clubs (or have links to them at least) so I don't see what difference that would make, and the Glazers would only become desperate if the situation at the club became more acute, so waiting is premised on degrees of destruction of the clubs status and finances, why you would want that scenario rather than accepting one of the options available now I don't know.
Elliott aren't offering to buy the club themselves, they're offering to fund either the Glazers or someone else (as they did with AC Milan) so they can leech off the club in the future (where else do you think they're interest payments are coming from?).
A billionaire won't have the time to go to and from Manchester as a fanIf a billionaire has time to go watch Chelsea a billionaire has time to make it to Manchester because of his billions.
It’s not us getting trains and busses!
Hes not exactly partnering. Hes buying them out. Them having 20% stake is pretty normal in acquisitions as there is very often an exit strategy planned for the seller.By partnering with the people who’ve put us in this position? It’s all down to credibility, Ratcliffe doesn’t seem to have much, seems more of an opportunist given he also tried to buy Chelsea. Given how restless the fanbase has been, you don’t think a little positive PR would help and lift the mood around the club? It’s an odd way to buy a business when your main customers don’t know your intentions.
He isn't. He also isn't taking the entirety of net profit of a single company for multiple years to pay for it either, especially when that company themselves have considerable debt repayment obligations within the next three years.
He's going to borrow from the banks.
Interesting. (Sorry you got a warning btw, didn't come from me and all good as far as I'm concerned)Duncan Castles article
It’s fine mate. I said what I said and I will take the consequences. No big deal.Interesting. (Sorry you got a warning btw, didn't come from me and all good as far as I'm concerned)
I don’t care who’s the new owner providing they invest in the club, stadium and clear some of that debt. Will Ratcliffe do that? I highly doubt it.Ratcliffe has bid more for less of a stake. Not really difficult in that scenario.
I agreeI don’t care who’s the new owner providing they invest in the club, stadium and clear some of that debt. Will Ratcliffe do that? I highly doubt it.
That puts it to bed then, so we can stop pretending Jassim is a ‘private businessman’.
No state-ownership of Manchester United. Hashtag that millennials!!
No, you asked why they’re so rich and I said gas. They’re the third highest producer of gas in the world, that’s why they’re rich.
You’ve forgotten a few hahahaha in your post there too buddy
Interesting. (Sorry you got a warning btw, didn't come from me and all good as far as I'm concerned)
Like Harry Stamper, Jassim will push the button and raise the bid before the INEOasteroid hits us.
Have you actually taken the time to look at qatar's environmental record.I’d say helping killing the planet is up there is not not? Isn’t that just as important or does that not suit?
Wouldn't go that farWho was the cyant who reported on Berba? He's one of the nicest posters here.
Jim'll fix itYeh, it's gonna be Jim, isn't it?
As a condition of the takeover agreement, it is understood that the pair would be granted options to sell their shares – at a premium to the current bid price – after year one and year two of Ineos' stewardship; or to retain their minority ownership indefinitely.Duncan Castles article
Leeches continue to prosper and profit from us. Yeah, me neither.As a condition of the takeover agreement, it is understood that the pair would be granted options to sell their shares – at a premium to the current bid price – after year one and year two of Ineos' stewardship; or to retain their minority ownership indefinitely.
feck off with that