Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not their fault that the owners don't give a shit about any of us.

Any decent owner would respond to that statement, or at least take note of it. Glazers wouldn't care if we all died so long as it didn't affect their wallets.

EDIT: "us" means all followers/fans of United, i'm not with MUST
I know, it just seems all these grandiose statements by the likes of MUST and the 58 (obvious differences noted) do nothing but make the fan base sound impatient, entitled and uneducated. Like you say, they won’t make a blind bit of difference to the Glazers.
 
Honestly I don't understand the angst and I don't understand how sport journalists can seriously sell the idea that less than 5 months is too long. Outside of an owner being forced to sell quickly, I don't remember any process that were quicker than 5 months between owners announcing that they wish to sell to the actual sale.

As an example the Carolina Panthers were sold after roughly 6 months, for the Denver Broncos it took roughly 8 months, for the Timberwolves it took nearly 11 months. All of these are cheaper than United and the respective leagues are involved in facilitating sales.

I think you have to factor in 2 things -

1. How long people have wanted them gone - not just Utd fans, there are many neutrals who think what they’ve done to Utd is disgusting. Saddling the biggest English club with hundreds of millions in debt and then using the club as their personal cash machine is obscene and never should’ve been legal to do.

2. The amount of profit they’re already going to make at 5b is way over what Utd is worth and thus it creates a wider view into their greed and lack of care for the club.

It’s these things that rightly bother people.
 
I know, it just seems all these grandiose statements by the likes of MUST and the 58 (obvious differences noted) do nothing but make the fan base sound impatient, entitled and uneducated. Like you say, they won’t make a blind bit of difference to the Glazers.
I see your point, but I'd expect the fan group to apply any pressure they can on the Glazers.

Also, while it won't make any difference to the Glazers (they probably won't even be told about it) it might be something that the next potential owners take note of. I'd expect either Sheikh Jassim or Ineos to be much more communicative with supporters and care more about the club.
 
A - will probably come from the transfer kitty.

If we don't spend money next summer then we won't make it to the CL the year after. That means that United's price will go down and we will make less money. In the end its the owners that will pay the price.
 
I think you have to factor in 2 things -

1. How long people have wanted them gone - not just Utd fans, there are many neutrals who think what they’ve done to Utd is disgusting. Saddling the biggest English club with hundreds of millions in debt and then using the club as their personal cash machine is obscene and never should’ve been legal to do.

2. The amount of profit they’re already going to make at 5b is way over what Utd is worth and thus it creates a wider view into their greed and lack of care for the club.

It’s these things that rightly bother people.

Neither of these things expedites the sale of an extremely pricy and probably complex entity. There is no justification for anyone to genuinely think that less than 5 months is too much time.
 
For obvious reasons there hasn’t been much to comment on this topic the last couple of weeks but maybe it’s time again with a few bullet points so some of our resident café members can relax a little bit before the final stages of the bidding process.

1. The Glazer will sell all their remaining MUFC shares before this is over.

Probably to the most attractive offer and I suspect that to come from the Nine Two Foundation. The reason for that is off course their superior financial recourses and especially the ability to buy the club with their own cash. State funded bid or not but with so much wealth it gives them the muscles to outbid any opponent if they really want to own one of the most prestigious sport clubs in the world.

2. I still think without one second of hesitation that the people from Qatar will be our best long term owner if we want to compete with Madrid, City, Newcastle and Co. I have the outmost respect for those who’re reluctant of being owned by a state and those who come from the HBTQ community but for me personally I don’t see this as a problem. United is located Great Britain and is followed by millions of supporters word wide and these reasons alone will make every new owner respectful against everyone connected to United.

3. The Glazers has nothing to win with delaying the selling process. Actually the longer this goes on the more risk they take. SJR has limited resources because he has to loan from high interest rate companies and that means that he can’t raise his bid too high. I suspect that everything above £5.5B is unknown territory for him. Since December 2022 the interest rates has increased with a couple of %. That’s why his initial valuation probably has changed and that’s why I think the NTF has this bidding war in their own hand.

I respect those who think differently and believe in other scenarios but with experience and age I feel rather comfortable with my prediction. But as always time will tell but until we know more maybe we can enjoy some good football. EtH has my full confidence.

I agree that they are unlikely to gain much or even anything from this third stage which is effectively just reopening the previous stage and asking for more money. They should have at least whittled it down to whether they are actually selling the club or just a minority share.

They are just using the same arguments/bluffs to get more money and I’m sure everyone involved in bidding is unlikely to fall for it. The longer any sales process like this drags on the more risk the buyer is taking but they are just motivated by pure greed so won’t see beyond that.

The only real pressure they can put on either INEOS or the Qatari’s is by playing on any impatience they may have in terms of not letting this summer window pass them by. Raine Group probably have their work cut out now in making sure it doesn’t drag on much longer than it should.
 
Has anyone other than Possibly Unreliable Twitter Glasses Man (PUTGM) said what they expect to happen after the 3rd bids are in?

I'm assuming they'll pretend to discuss things for a week or two, to make it look like the Glazers aren't just interested in the highest offer. Then they'll go exclusive with one bidder for another week or two before we finally get a conclusion.
 
Has anyone other than Possibly Unreliable Twitter Glasses Man (PUTGM) said what they expect to happen after the 3rd bids are in?

I'm assuming they'll pretend to discuss things for a week or two, to make it look like the Glazers aren't just interested in the highest offer. Then they'll go exclusive with one bidder for another week or two before we finally get a conclusion.

I'm expecting this to drag on for months, once the Glazers accept a bid and 'go exclusive' there is still going to be a long period of due diligence and legal wrangling
 
I'd assume he means if this whole thing is a ruse and the Glazers don't actually intend to sell. They will still have to pay raine for their services, I'm certain an institution like that will not have put months of work in for free for no renumeration in the event of no sale
These things are typically structured with an up front fee (when work begins; i.e. already paid), sometimes a fee payable upon signing a definitive agreement for the transaction, and then a success fee at closing that's typically a % of the transaction value. So in short, Raine has almost certainly already been paid everything they're due under their engagement, if there's no deal signed/closed.
 
Is it public knowledge how many rounds of bidding there is going to be?

Surely the bidders aren't surprised when they are both told "you've made it to the next round" rather than "your bid is accepted or rejected"?
 
I'm expecting this to drag on for months, once the Glazers accept a bid and 'go exclusive' there is still going to be a long period of due diligence and legal wrangling
Isn't the due diligence deadline next week? Or am I misunderstanding that?

And yes, to be clear when I say "conclusion" I just meant we'll get an idea about what is likely to happen (an agreement on price and no further negotiations) before all the legal bollocks and inevitable twats trying to block it
 
Is it public knowledge how many rounds of bidding there is going to be?

Surely the bidders aren't surprised when they are both told "you've made it to the next round" rather than "your bid is accepted or rejected"?
The journalists who reported that there will be a 3rd round of bids (deadline on the 28th) say this is the final round.

What happens then seems unknown, but I guess they'll have to pick a preferred bidder to go exclusive with. So romantic
 
Isn't the due diligence deadline next week? Or am I misunderstanding that?

And yes, to be clear when I say "conclusion" I just meant we'll get an idea about what is likely to happen (an agreement on price and no further negotiations) before all the legal bollocks and inevitable twats trying to block it

The deadlines are nothing fixed as we have seen already - only the media make out it's some hard date to aim for, in reality these things are changing all the time

Even after agreeing to go forward with one party there can still be further negotiations
 
Even after agreeing to go forward with one party there can still be further negotiations
Yes that's what I said originally. That after the third offers, that I guess they'll go exclusive and negotiate with a single party.

I'm absolutely no expert, nor would I be surprised if it was August or later until the Glazers are officially no longer affiliated with Manchester United, but once an exclusivity period starts there has to be more willingness from all parties to reach an end point. It's approaching half a year.
 
These things are typically structured with an up front fee (when work begins; i.e. already paid), sometimes a fee payable upon signing a definitive agreement for the transaction, and then a success fee at closing that's typically a % of the transaction value. So in short, Raine has almost certainly already been paid everything they're due under their engagement, if there's no deal signed/closed.

Well ok, so do people think Glazers paid an upfront fee to stag a few months long ruse where at the end they go "sorry we're not actually selling lol"
 
I'm expecting this to drag on for months, once the Glazers accept a bid and 'go exclusive' there is still going to be a long period of due diligence and legal wrangling
I think most of the due diligence will already have been done. I would expect that Glazer’s lawyers would also have prepared a draft sales contract that the bidders have sight of - if they really want to sell that is. If they accept an offer it just comes down to the nuts and bolts of negotiating the fine detail of the contract.
 
It’s ridiculous that the fecking Glazer’s honestly believe we’re taken in by the posturing of they don’t need to sell and happy to stay if their valuation isn’t me or that the family are split over selling up.

They’ve hired Raine which in itself won’t be cheap, they’ll have agreed a price or percentage to pay Raine once the deal is complete, they’ve opened up the club financial books to outside parties and made interested parties come to Manchester for meetings and none of that happens if they’re not intent on selling.
 
Honestly I don't understand the angst and I don't understand how sport journalists can seriously sell the idea that less than 5 months is too long. Outside of an owner being forced to sell quickly, I don't remember any process that were quicker than 5 months between owners announcing that they wish to sell to the actual sale.

As an example the Carolina Panthers were sold after roughly 6 months, for the Denver Broncos it took roughly 8 months, for the Timberwolves it took nearly 11 months. All of these are cheaper than United and the respective leagues are involved in facilitating sales.

exactly, it was always going to take ages to sort out. People are way too impatient.

the glazers are businessmen. Selling United is probably going to be their single most important transaction in their lives - they’re going to extract as much as they can from it. People who think they should just accept the first offer seemingly have no idea how business works
 
Is it public knowledge how many rounds of bidding there is going to be?

Surely the bidders aren't surprised when they are both told "you've made it to the next round" rather than "your bid is accepted or rejected"?
I don't get all this shit about bidding rounds. What if both buyers already made max offers and they just send same bid as in 2nd round?
And what if Glazers after 3rd bid say; "ok, you are in "exclusive round". Time for 4th offer".
 
I don't get all this shit about bidding rounds. What if both buyers already made max offers and they just send same bid as in 2nd round?
And what if Glazers after 3rd bid say; "ok, you are in "exclusive round". Time for 4th offer".

The first round was about formally expressing interest without clear numbers, the second round was about allowing buyers to have access to financial data and make a first actual offer. Unless one of the party made an offer that is way above the others, a third round should occur for at least two reasons first because the parties that have competitive but smaller offers should be given the opportunity to reevaluate their bids and secondly it allows the seller to maybe squeeze more money. And a fourth round could be for two reasons, exclusive negotiations with a single party, or two or more bidders are close.
 
US Dollars or GB Pounds? It’s not entirely clear what the bidding currency is - or the Glazer’s expectations. I can see one of the bidders going to 6Bn US, but 6Bn GBP is way overvalued.

News just broke that the Washington Commanders NFL franchise will be sold for $6 billion. That will not lessen the Glazers’ evaluation of MUFC. They will likely view the club as being worth more than the NFL team.
 
US Dollars or GB Pounds? It’s not entirely clear what the bidding currency is - or the Glazer’s expectations. I can see one of the bidders going to 6Bn US, but 6Bn GBP is way overvalued.

It isn’t overvalued if anyone is willing to pay 6B GBP for United. That bid would define exactly what they are worth. We need to remember that this is the biggest football club that will ever come on the market. This sale is something like the Mona Lisa coming up for sale.
 
That would actually surprise me, they don’t want to be seen to be over paying.
it just seems to end the whole saga of the Glazers nightmare inline with how theyve feasted on the club. Walk away with a billion each to close the book, and the story goes down in folklore
 
Possibly, but they can also forget about paying themselves dividends, and watch our financial situation spiral out of control as we struggle without CL football, causing the market value of the club to sink.
They will take money from the club one way or another.
How is that supposed to work? Raine will be paid a percentage of the sale, it won't come from the clubs accounts and the Glazers can't just take money out of the club's accounts, it's not their personal accounts.
They own the club. There are many ways to take money from the club outside of taking a withdrawn from an account. I would not put it past them having a way for the club to be paying Raine directly if they don't sell.
Absolutely not.
I hope you're right.
If we don't spend money next summer then we won't make it to the CL the year after. That means that United's price will go down and we will make less money. In the end its the owners that will pay the price.
They will do whatever is going to benefit them the most. If they think they can weasel a few more million or possibly a billion out of not selling now and hanging on for another few years, they will do that.
I agree, now is the best time for them to sell. We're on an upward trajectory.
 
I'm expecting this to drag on for months, once the Glazers accept a bid and 'go exclusive' there is still going to be a long period of due diligence and legal wrangling
There are some rumors they are doing this stuff in the background now, so that way if the bid is accepted they can get it wrapped up quick and take part in the summer transfer window
 
it just seems to end the whole saga of the Glazers nightmare inline with how theyve feasted on the club. Walk away with a billion each to close the book, and the story goes down in folklore
They own 69% of the club, they cant walk with 1 billion each. It is also being repeated by Gary Neville, cant believe he does not know that they own 100% of the club and can not walk with 1B each.
 
I would have to imagine that this process dragging out, potentially beyond this transfer window, would have to lower the value of the club. Things are looking quite good this season, but if we have a poor transfer window, and the team really doesn't progress next season, and how could we progress without buying a handfull of players, then the shine will start to wear off EtH, momentum will began to drop and that could have real impact on the value. I have to imagine now is their prime moment, when everyone, rightfully, thinks EtH is about to take this club places.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.