dove
New Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 7,899
Not sure what does it have to do with us?So the WWE managed to get sold off by Raine before us.....
Not sure what does it have to do with us?So the WWE managed to get sold off by Raine before us.....
Football is become closer to WWE with every passing moment I suppose.Not sure what does it have to do with us?
My guess is we'll find out later this week that there will be a new round of bidding after Easter.
Nothing important, but I will post it just to have a Twitter post on this page.
That thing has been in the works long, long before the Glazers wanted to sell.So the WWE managed to get sold off by Raine before us.....
It’s possible but how many stages can they drag it out with only two bidders for a full sale. Neither seem interested in a bidding war and I’m sure one or both will run out of patience fairly soon.
I’m sure the Raine Group will be pushing them for a decision as well so hopefully we get some significant progress this week.
What is long-term for a 70y.o man?
As long as the bids are relatively close in size and below the Glazers' valuation, Raine will surely keep trying to push them up. We also don't know that they are only two bidders for a full sale and, even if there are, they are also competing against any offers of minority sale/investment, of which at least one is publicly known (Elliott Management). The risk, as you say, is one or more of the bidders walking away, but I'd bet on another round.
WWE's merger with the UFC confirmed. Raine taking home a nice packet no doubt. Wonder if they'd been prioritising this...$21bn combined now.
Holy feck, that's a big bag for all involved.
What is long-term for a 70y.o man?
WWE's merger with the UFC confirmed. Raine taking home a nice packet no doubt. Wonder if they'd been prioritising this...$21bn combined now.
They had equally disappointing SundaysNot sure what does it have to do with us?
According to The Athletic, a loan of £200 million was taken out last simmer, from the “revolving credit facility” agreed with Bank of America Securities.
That money was used to complete signings and it must be paid back in June to permit further spending.
The Glazers will plan to use this credit card again in the summer to make new signings and it goes without saying that Ten Hag will need to sell a number of players to raise funds.
David Ornstein and Laurie Whitwell report: “United feel they are now able to repay this due to income coming in the back end of the season from sponsorship, broadcast and season tickets.
“The sim that needs paying off is actually £206.2m, given the interest added on.
No. And that's a bad sign.
The Glazers aren't going to announce they're staying all of a sudden because that could trigger large and viscous protests. So if they now intend to stay, they will slow the 'sale process' down (less news and updates) and gradually brief that they're quite likely to stay. Then, when a point is reached where people expect them to stay, they'll announce it. There'll still be protests etc. but just not as badly if they made an abrupt announcement.
Think you have to be a bit mental to get to where they are in the first placeWho knows what's happening, but they'd be mental to turn down 5b.
That's what happens if/when we get sold.Thick and gloopy?! The mind boggles at what that might entail!
According to Jackson's article, this idea isn't being briefed by the Glazers though. Jackson says the concerns have been raised by one of the bidders; I strongly suspect from reading the rest of it that it might well be Ratcliffe.No. And that's a bad sign.
The Glazers aren't going to announce they're staying all of a sudden because that could trigger large and viscous protests. So if they now intend to stay, they will slow the 'sale process' down (less news and updates) and gradually brief that they're quite likely to stay. Then, when a point is reached where people expect them to stay, they'll announce it. There'll still be protests etc. but just not as badly if they made an abrupt announcement.
What's the latest news from Qatar? Assuming you're from thereAccording to Jackson's article, this idea isn't being briefed by the Glazers though. Jackson says the concerns have been raised by one of the bidders; I strongly suspect from reading the rest of it that it might well be Ratcliffe.
To be clear, I don't think you're being massively unreasonable mate. I myself am also quite worried that we might end up seeing the Glazers cling on. I'm just not sure this story actually quite aligns with what you've posted.
That's what happens if/when we get sold.
But doesn’t it make more sense from a failed bidder to have that excuse rather than the sellers who can simply say the price hasn’t been reached? Why would the Glazers need this reasoning?According to Jackson's article, this idea isn't being briefed by the Glazers though. Jackson says the concerns have been raised by one of the bidders; I strongly suspect from reading the rest of it that it might well be Ratcliffe.
To be clear, I don't think you're being massively unreasonable mate. I myself am also quite worried that we might end up seeing the Glazers cling on. I'm just not sure this story actually quite aligns with what you've posted.
Why would you assume I'm from Qatar?What's the latest news from Qatar? Assuming you're from there
It’s your accentWhy would you assume I'm from Qatar?
This is why I said that the Jamie Jackson story is (according to Jackson himself) based on what has been said by one of the bidders. Again, purely based on what seems logical to me based on the rest of the article, my guess would be that it's coming from Ratcliffe. I don't actually have any inside information, though.But doesn’t it make more sense from a failed bidder to have that excuse rather than the sellers who can simply say the price hasn’t been reached? Why would the Glazers need this reasoning?
Oh for feck's sake, I completely forgot about my usernameIt’s your accent
They are starting to take the piss now, the Glazers are going to ruin our summer aren't they?
What about Naughty FC?Nice fc are at 8th place BTW
According to Jackson's article, this idea isn't being briefed by the Glazers though. Jackson says the concerns have been raised by one of the bidders; I strongly suspect from reading the rest of it that it might well be Ratcliffe.
To be clear, I don't think you're being massively unreasonable mate. I myself am also quite worried that we might end up seeing the Glazers cling on. I'm just not sure this story actually quite aligns with what you've posted.
What an irrational assumption to make based on your username. What was he thinking.Why would you assume I'm from Qatar?