VanGaalEra
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 13,270
Interesting read, could it all be about to unravel for them?
This is the FA mate. Creating a mess is what they do. For once I'd be happy if City was on the receiving end of a punishment instead of us.PSG got away with it, can't help but think City will too. How would you even take the league away? Too much of a mess.
What's the jist of this please?
Basically, City sponsored themselves to cover FFP. The Premier League wanted to see documents, City haven't complied and have been in a league battle for 2 years with the league. The Mail found out but were gagged and unable to report it, until now.
Clearly they have no qualms in confronting City on this.Is the question: will the PL have enough money to take city on in a court battle rather than are they actually going to punish them?
3 league titles on trial..Manchester United: 23 league titles and counting.
Congrats fellow caftards. Better late than never!
Yeah but UEFA are bent.UEFA already judged those sponsorship contracts fair, didn't they?
Also didn't PSG do the same thing?
Rui Pinto, at the heart of football leaks is in witness protection in Portugal. Struck a deal to turn whistleblower and is willing to help the PL also.
I’m with you. Please let the PL have the balls UEFA didn’t.Please please may there actually be some consequences for their actions. I hate them.
The Premier League is a union. No union is going to compromise the structure and value of its product. There will be some punishment but nothing serious.I’m with you. Please let the PL have the balls UEFA didn’t.
They may be given a small fine if we are lucky.
Is no one going to comment on City being defended by Lord Pannick? What a name.
Thanks! Typical City, blot on the sportBasically, City sponsored themselves to cover FFP. The Premier League wanted to see documents, City haven't complied and have been in a league battle for 2 years with the league. The Mail found out but were gagged and unable to report it, until now.