#07
makes new threads with tweets in the OP
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2010
- Messages
- 23,663
Looks like he’s set to move to Chelsea in the summer. €60m release clause is a bargain.
Now being reported by Chelsea connected journalists in England:
Looks like he’s set to move to Chelsea in the summer. €60m release clause is a bargain.
Now being reported by Chelsea connected journalists in England:
Because he's neither a striker or a wide forward. He's somewhere in-between, much like Mount and Havertz. He's [probably] better than both of them but he has the same positional ambiguity about him. Maybe Harry Potter will make it work.Can see the Chelsea fans with excitement on twitter, it seems like a very good deal. Not sure however if he comes in as a striker or wide forward. Think it will also take him time to adjust to the league irrespective of who he signed for.
Hope he is another Werner, there is always hope.That's a decent price for him, though he isn't looking as good atm but there's a year still.
A potentially very dumb question, but what was the point in him doing a medical last summer for a move this summer. He’ll have to do a further medical at the time prior to insurance sign off anyway.
If any long term issues were found out now the buying club can plan accordingly.
Another attacking flop for Chelsea.
Fair point. No reason to wait a season for someone with cheese strings for ligaments.If any long term issues were found out now the buying club can plan accordingly.
If any long term issues were found out now the buying club can plan accordingly.
In the case of the signing of Nkunku would the signing of Endrick be ruled out?
Why? Endrick stays in Brazil for the next couple of years regardless of who signs him, no?
Someone is terrified at the thought of Boehly's Boyz.
In theory Endrick will spend 2 years in Brazil and then come to Europe. If Nkunku performs well, and is young, he still thinks he won't have many minutes.
That doesn’t make any sense. Whoever signs him, whether it be Barca, Real or someone else, won’t avoid signing attackers because of a 16 year old in Brazil who’s required to stay in Brazil for at least another 2 years anyway.
That doesn’t make any sense. Whoever signs him, whether it be Barca, Real or someone else, won’t avoid signing attackers because of a 16 year old in Brazil who’s required to stay in Brazil for at least another 2 years anyway.
Someone is terrified at the thought of Boehly's Boyz.
Yeah. It's actually a good time to sign him + someone else.
You know he's here in 2 years time. Sign an attacker on a 5 year deal, in year 3 they're both at the club and then you make a call on whether on who's going to be your solution for the 3 years after that.
Endrick will sign when he's 18, I think. And when Nkunku signs Endrick will be 17 years old.
And there he will see in which teams he will have more options to play.
If Nkunku performs at Chelsea at the same level as in Germany, the Brazilian's options will be minimal.
Someone is terrified at the thought of Boehly's Boyz.