Sayros
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2015
- Messages
- 6,006
- Supports
- Paris Saint-Germain
I neither say we do or don't require him. You are not reading what I just told you. I counter your argument of saying that we sign him based on the player meets the ''identity'' but you are not looking at both things of both identity and roles. We should be looking at both. For example, if his best position is no 10, why should we sign him this summer after giving Bruno a new contract? He spent lot of his time at RB Leipzig playing as attacking midfield of behind striker or this season as second striker in 2 striker position. Him being capable to play wide as good as he is in the middle is still debatable, even if he is capable to play wide as good as he offers in the middle, another question appears whether it is right or left, if it is left then once again we have Sancho and Rashford that already covered the position. I even checked this in Transfermarkt, his most played position at RB Leipzig is second striker and attacking mid, in comparison to wide area, it's very small number that he even play there and even when he does, he plays on the left more than on the right. If you can provide something to backup your statement, share it.
That's my issue with this move. And it honestly feels like a repeat of the Sancho saga where many, including myself, said he was very good on the right, even if he was slightly better on the left, and so of course he was going to come here to play on the RW, that never happened. Nkunku is definitely better on the left than on the right, I'd say the difference of his comfort and ability to impact the game for RB Leipzig on the left compared to the right is bigger than it was with Sancho's at Dortmund.