Kostov
Full Member
If we do get Sancho it would be great and loosing on Pulisic would be worth it. However 60m euros on Pulisic was a great deal to be explored.Really? Rashford, Greenwood and (potentially) Sancho not enough for ye?!
If we do get Sancho it would be great and loosing on Pulisic would be worth it. However 60m euros on Pulisic was a great deal to be explored.Really? Rashford, Greenwood and (potentially) Sancho not enough for ye?!
You said this already. Gets old after the first time.By the way, seems to be another Dortmund export not making it in the EPL. Better stay away from Bundesliga players.
You said this already. Gets old after the first time.
I forget quite how many Americans are actually on social media until Pulisic scores a fairly average goal.
His best ever record for assists is 6, James has 6 this season as well. Rashford has 7 this season.A very good player and why we absolutely must get sancho, we just don't have any player in the squad now that offers us what he does for Chelsea.
10 goals and 10 assists despite missing huge chunks of the season and it being his first year.His best ever record for assists is 6, James has 6 this season as well. Rashford has 7 this season.
His career goals combined is 1 more than Greenwood has this season alone.
Lets not pretend he is more than he is.
Doesnt mean hes providing something we don't have. Thats my point. We don't need a Sancho to have an answer to him.10 goals and 10 assists despite missing huge chunks of the season and it being his first year.
You said this already. Gets old after the first time.
Apologies my man. Mistook you for another German posterYou said this already. Gets old after the first time.
True. Especially since I was wrong anyway.Not as old as people constantly talking about how "hard" the Premier league is and "best league in the world" stuff sprouted constantly.
Doesnt mean hes providing something we don't have. Thats my point. We don't need a Sancho to have an answer to him.
Leroy sane has just said in an interview we have signed werner and havertz ???
Any time he is not even in the starting line up, there's a ton of USA "Chelsea fans" giving tons of shit in the official Chelsea Twitter feed, even if he's missing through injury.
Never meant in terms of goals or assist we have plenty of players for that. Was more talking about his dribling and ability to create something from nothing, which I would say we currently don't have and sancho would provide, especially from the wide areas.To be fair I'm not sure you have anyone as good at dribbling as Pulisic - Sancho would provide this and would represent another way of breaking a defense down the way Pulisic does. That said, I'm not sure why goals & assists are being cited as you clearly have plenty of that in the front line.
I wonder why so many American kids go to Europe before age 18. I thought it was illegal under new transfer rules?
I wonder why so many American kids go to Europe before age 18. I thought it was illegal under new transfer rules?
He has been better than I thought. I was expecting him to be good but not this good. He has been their talisman, a catalyst for their form towards the end.
To be fair his muscular problems started much earlier. This might actually be a problem to be worried about..Potentially worrisome history of muscle injuries at this point - hope this is a fluke / a byproduct of being overused by the US in the Gold Cup last summer.
That said, he finishes on 11 goals & 10 assists in 34 appearances (2348 minutes) this year in all competitions - very impressive return especially for a wide player. He's comfortably our best player right now and for me that indicates further reinforcements are needed in our attack.
To be fair his muscular problems started much earlier. This might actually be a problem to be worried about..
https://www.transfermarkt.com/christian-pulisic/verletzungen/spieler/315779
You need Eva Carneiro back.Yeah sorry, didn't mean to give the impression that I meant that was limited to this season - as you rightly point out his history goes back a bit although the severity of his injuries has picked up this year.
I hope he isn’t plagued by injuries. He’s one of those players that I automatically hate because he looks like he’ll be very good for you for many years to come, but he’s such a joy to watch. He’s just the typical idea of an exciting footballer. Very aggressive with his dribbling and has a great finish on him. He’s very similar in style to Hazard but faster - if he even becomes half as good as him you have some player in your hands. feck if all your attackers gel next season that’s properly frightening.Potentially worrisome history of muscle injuries at this point - hope this is a fluke / a byproduct of being overused by the US in the Gold Cup last summer.
That said, he finishes on 11 goals & 10 assists in 34 appearances (2348 minutes) this year in all competitions - very impressive return especially for a wide player. He's comfortably our best player right now and for me that indicates further reinforcements are needed in our attack.
No problem, it's just something that looks really bad and as you said the severity of the injuries is starting to look really worrying. Didn't Joe Cole have problems with his muscles for most of his career? But anyway one of my mates was a very very quick player in his youth. His hamstring snapped when he was around 16 and before he turned 23 his career was over because it would tear at the seem 5 times in these 7 years. Just saying these muscle injuries are a real nightmare and often really hard to treat and prevent..Yeah sorry, didn't mean to give the impression that I meant that was limited to this season - as you rightly point out his history goes back a bit although the severity of his injuries has picked up this year.
You need Eva Carneiro back.
I hope he isn’t plagued by injuries. He’s one of those players that I automatically hate because he looks like he’ll be very good for you for many years to come, but he’s such a joy to watch. He’s just the typical idea of an exciting footballer. Very aggressive with his dribbling and has a great finish on him. He’s very similar in style to Hazard but faster - if he even becomes half as good as him you have some player in your hands. feck if all your attackers gel next season that’s properly frightening.
Shame about his injury today... proved to be the turning point.
Not really, Arsenal were good value for the win even with Pulisic on the field.
Eh, there were several turning points. Azpi's injury meant Chelsea were scrambling much the way you were in the semis with Bailly's injury - after halftime we looked to have gotten to grips with things but the Pulisic injury more or less was the nail in our coffin. Don't think Arsenal were overwhelming Chelsea prior to Pulisic's leaving - they'd had a tame header from Auba, a goal rightly ruled out for offsides, a fairly soft but ultimately correct penalty, half a chance that didn't lead to a shot thanks to an Alonso feckup and not much else. Lots of possession in midfield with little actual threat.
Obviously I'm biased but I thought that when Pulisic was on the field Chelsea edged things. Without him Arsenal had the clear advantage. We didn't have anyone to drop into midfield to drive at the opposition without Willian or Pulisic - Pedro simply has never done this at any point in his career (especially now).