- Joined
- May 18, 2019
- Messages
- 87
- Supports
- Chelsea
It’s quite a feat of cognitive dissonance when people are looking for answers as to why Chelsea win things since Abramovic took over and not thinking about the residual benefits of the biggest investment ever made to a football team in history.
They win because they’ve spent, relatively - don’t look at figures without context - an obscene amount of money to build teams with very good players in them.
The biggest favour Chelsea have had is Manchester City as City’s spending and recent success seems to have made many completely forget exactly how Chelsea became a ‘big’ club.
As a west Londoner, I, and many non Chelsea fans used to laugh (and despair) at Ken Bates’s antics as well as the very vocal National Front minority at Chelsea. That club were very close to becoming luxury housing. And if Roman didn’t like the look of North London from his helicopter we wouldn’t be discussing any of Chelsea’s ‘amazing’ successes over the last 15 years or so.
This isn’t meant as a slight on any Chelsea fans that may be reading this, but letBi’s not rewrite history. Arsene Wenger, among many, hated Chelsea’s financial ‘doping’ long before the Arabs had even heard of Manchester. There’s no special secret to their success - just highly dubiously acquired wealth.
Bitter. Every club that has won things has got an injection of cash. Madrid, Barca, Liverpool United all of you have won things by buying the best players.