Mibabalou
Full Member
If someone just let pick which we'd win, I would pick the CL. Yes the winning the league means we would be the best most consistent team and you can fluke a CL win but who cares you're called the best in Europe!
If someone just let pick which we'd win, I would pick the CL. Yes the winning the league means we would be the best most consistent team and you can fluke a CL win but who cares you're called the best in Europe!
Either, because let's be honest we'd be lucky to get one of them, tough trophies to win. Slight preference for the league but not enough to vote one way or the other.
I'd say a PL win with no CL is better than the reverse. You have to question the credentials of a CL winning team who were nowhere in their domestic league (fine achievement though it is).
The answer of course is to win both in the same season
Eden Hazard, unfortunately. Chelsea have 2 League titles off the back of his decision.Did anyone call Chelsea the best team in Europe, in 2012?
We wouldn't be nowhere though. Yes "first is first and second is nowhere" but armed with a CL a respectable second is no shame for where we are coming from. It wouldn't devalue our CL win one bit imo.
Agree. First, show that you're the best team in your league at least. A champions league whilst doing that makes you true champions of Europe (yes I know that doesn't mean anything in the 'books').Did anyone call Chelsea the best team in Europe, in 2012?
Agree CL and second place in your league is brilliant, and for what it's worth CL and 17th would be pretty fecking good too. But while a PL winner falling short in a cup tournament against the world's best teams (and fellow domestic champions in most cases) is entirely reasonable there's something a little off for me about a team who bests those teams but can't compete domestically.
We've never won the Champions League without winning the league as well, so I don't know how this feels...
...but I reckon it'd feel a bit weird winning JUST the UCL, like something was missing - like you can't quite call yourself the best team in Europe cos you didn't win your domestic league.
Any Chelsea/Liverpool fans care to enlighten us?
There just isn't the same romance in winning the CL while not winning your domestic league in the same season.
League should always be priority.
This, but I would like to ad, if you are wining a CL without winning your own league, it should be bare minimum to have won PL year before. I don't think it did liverpool world of good fluking that CL win in 2005. Not having won EFL/PL since 1990.
Something like this should club honor list read
1967 - English Football Champions
1968 - European Champions.
Good question actually, does make you think.
Champions League for me. Not even sure why I think and feel that, but I certainly do. (Where is the final being played btw...???)