Even his knee slide is smooth as feck
Now let’s get Frenkie to play alongside him. This five time CL winner deserves a top class midfielder to partner him while still in his prime now. Don’t wait till he’s 33 then do it
Even his knee slide is smooth as feck
Yes, finally we have a midfielder again that can move the ball around like Carrick did.Just saw a compilation of his match, I think he might be the best passer at this club. And we have a few great ones. Just ridiculous.
Early days but he might be the best midfielder I've seen at this club. How do you guys think he compares to Scholes/Keane.
Early days but he might be the best midfielder I've seen at this club. How do you guys think he compares to Scholes/Keane.
Now let’s get Frenkie to play alongside him. This five time CL winner deserves a top class midfielder to partner him while still in his prime now. Don’t wait till he’s 33 then do it
Alpha men dont get along well with *****. Thats all I can say.Now let’s get Frenkie to play alongside him. This five time CL winner deserves a top class midfielder to partner him while still in his prime now. Don’t wait till he’s 33 then do it
Actually it was Pep who said Carrick was one of the best midfielders he'd seen, and on the same level as Alonso and Busquets.
I've also never heard of anyone comparing him to Barry.....not even City fans
 have you been away?
Jesus.Alpha men dont get along well with *****. Thats all I can say.
Capello preferred Barry
Barry fit in comfortably alongside David Silva and Yaya Toure for 3 years, could play intricate football with them and did such a good job anchoring the midfield at City that it only became apparent how lazy Toure was once Barry left.
Carrick was a very good player for United but was generally regarded as one of the players in that era who needed to be upgraded.
Casemiro is an absolutely elite footballer who would start for any team in the world - you can’t rationally compare them.
Alpha men dont get along well with *****. Thats all I can say.
Honestly this is absolute bollocks.Capello preferred Barry
Barry fit in comfortably alongside David Silva and Yaya Toure for 3 years, could play intricate football with them and did such a good job anchoring the midfield at City that it only became apparent how lazy Toure was once Barry left.
Carrick was a very good player for United but was generally regarded as one of the players in that era who needed to be upgraded.
Casemiro is an absolutely elite footballer who would start for any team in the world - you can’t rationally compare them.
Honestly this is absolute bollocks.
The only time that started to happen was when he was nearing his mid-thirties. Carrick was a Rolls Royce of a player. I feel a bit sad for you if you couldn’t appreciate that at the time.
Has done since the day he arrived. He’s been adamant him and his family will speak English since he landed. If you want to adapt and fully integrate you have to speak the language, he’s a man that fully understands what it takes and shows every week he’s not here just for the pay.I know there is a language barrier but apparently he is taking English lessons. More than Bruno I think Casemiro should eventually wear the captain’s armband.
Just had an argument/disagreement with 2 city fans at work. Casemiro vs Rodri. They think Rodri is better than Casemiro…. They’re obviously being biased and accused me of being but how can anyone say rodri is better than Casemiro? If there is any fans on here other then united and city, who you sayings better?
Even when Hargreaves was fit, Carrick played ahead of him. Hargreaves was shifted out wide multiple times and it was the only area he was actually effective for United. None of those players were ever ousting Carrick from midfield.I loved him as a player, but context is essential - had Hargreaves not been crippled, Fletcher not had his illness and Anderson not been glutinous, I think Carrick’s role would have been substantially reduced. Even with all that factored in, he had spells of being out of form or even out of the team.
There was a 3 year period after Sir Alex retired where our win percentage without Carrick was 38% and 60% with him. That's at the point he and others were winding down, mass exits, poor transfers, Moyes and Van Gaal...I loved him as a player, but context is essential - had Hargreaves not been crippled, Fletcher not had his illness and Anderson not been glutinous, I think Carrick’s role would have been substantially reduced. Even with all that factored in, he had spells of being out of form or even out of the team.
He also preferred Scott Parker. He also played Milner and Young on the wings and took Heskey to a World Cup to play up front.Capello preferred Barry
Barry fit in comfortably alongside David Silva and Yaya Toure for 3 years, could play intricate football with them and did such a good job anchoring the midfield at City that it only became apparent how lazy Toure was once Barry left.
Carrick was a very good player for United but was generally regarded as one of the players in that era who needed to be upgraded.
Casemiro is an absolutely elite footballer who would start for any team in the world - you can’t rationally compare them.
Yes, finally we have a midfielder again that can move the ball around like Carrick did.
It really makes a world of difference to our football.
Miss the classy bastard
The "since Casemiro became a starter" table looks pretty great for us, both in underlying stats and actual table.
So basically, since Casemiro has come in, we've been the best defensive side in the league, and have had the best overall performances/deserved the most points... Not bad.
- 10 games, 7 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss - 23 points (only Newcastle has more over this run with 24, impressively)
- 16 goals scored (meh), 6 conceded (tied 2nd with Arsenal)
- 18.89 xG (just 2 fewer than Liverpool who are top), 8.04 xGA (just 0.5 more than Arsenal who are top, but have a game fewer)
- 20.99xPts, which is top of the league over this period (1.1 more than Arsenal who have a game fewer)
Just had an argument/disagreement with 2 city fans at work. Casemiro vs Rodri. They think Rodri is better than Casemiro…. They’re obviously being biased and accused me of being but how can anyone say rodri is better than Casemiro? If there is any fans on here other then united and city, who you sayings better?
Since Casemiro has come in, we've played:Context needs to be put in place too.
We had played Arsenal, Liverpool, City before Casemiro got into the first team. Look at the teams we played.
Lets see in the next 2 games if the stats are the same.
Since Casemiro has come in, we've played:
Basically, it's a very decent sample where it's evenly split between good/mid/poor sides. For sure, the next 2 games will say a lot, mainly if we play them even against City and Arsenal then it would be somewhat safe to say that we are not far off the top at all in terms of performance level (it's another thing to have the quality/ruthlessness to get the points required consistently)
- Newcastle, Spurs, Chelsea from big teams
- West Ham, Villa, Fulham from decent teams
- Forest, Wolves, Bournemouth from shit teams
Just had an argument/disagreement with 2 city fans at work. Casemiro vs Rodri. They think Rodri is better than Casemiro…. They’re obviously being biased and accused me of being but how can anyone say rodri is better than Casemiro? If there is any fans on here other then united and city, who you sayings better?