Haddock
Full Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
- Messages
- 729
To be fair to BT, Moore is a lifelong Portsmouth fan who enjoys a dig at Southampton.
Nah, it really is worse. It's very clear they all go in for this everyman down the pub angle and fancy themselves as fans where ‘not understanding’ is somehow deemed insight. You shouldn't need Peter Walton there to explain decisions, they should all know the laws, and you shouldn't need to be an ex player to talk about the game at the basic level they do. They're there because they should understand the game at a level we don’t. I’m genuinely starting to think managers might talk to their players about passion and desire and wanting it more, because the ex pros have feck all else to offer.
Compare it to any other sport‘s coverage and the banality of football coverage is really apparent.
The feeling is mutual.Jake Humphrey always sounds deflated when United win. He can't stand us.
But he's spot on though. BBC did point to the challenge as being crucial and then the ruthlessness of the finishing instead of VARTo be fair to BT, Moore is a lifelong Portsmouth fan who enjoys a dig at Southampton.
True that. I like to stick around to get Ole's comments but I don't care too much for what anyone else has to say. I can form my own opinion.I haven't watched a after game analysis for atleast a decade.
Granted I hear SKY do a decent show of it but, in the main, I never feel like I'm missing out of anything amazingly insightful, especially when your pundits are Rio, Owen, Scholes and Sherwood.
It's infuriating. They deliberately try to take the joy out of any United win by looking for the slightest little reason the other team were badly done to. Last night they were really clutching at straws.City win 3-0 and all you hear is how they're the best team in Europe right now, no one plays better football, heir to the crown, all that bollocks. United win 9-0, let's talk for 15 minutes solid about VAR and red cards because that red card and penalty at 6-0 was a match-defining moment.
While we're on the subject of pundits trying to fabricate controversy, it's long overdue that Sky replace Geoff Shreeves as their post-match interviewer. That cnut can suck the life out of any victory for a player or manager with some truly bizarre questions. Always trying to stir something up.
That was awful. I would have cheered if he had punch Shreeves in the face.Just ask Branislav Ivanovic
I don't get it to be honest? I also feel like the general public mostly accepts VAR now for what it is, we know how it works even if we don't understand all the refereeing decisions still. It doesn't matter if someone is 1mm offside, guess what? They're offside.It's infuriating. They deliberately try to take the joy out of any United win by looking for the slightest little reason the other team were badly done to. Last night they were really clutching at straws.
Shiiiiit, forgot about that one. Wanker.Just ask Branislav Ivanovic
They decided at half time that was right after looking at it once from one angle.Why don’t they also cover the Cavani penalty shout, which was just as contentious?
Good post, and I completely agree. As an example, listening to Atherton, Hussein, Key etc on Sky's cricket coverage, you feel they are communicating genuine insights about the game which the average viewer (or even most keen fans), wouldn't have appreciated for themselves. The large majority of football pundits merely describe what you've just watched, and resort to tired cliches whilst doing so.
I don't get it to be honest? I also feel like the general public mostly accepts VAR now for what it is, we know how it works even if we don't understand all the refereeing decisions still. It doesn't matter if someone is 1mm offside, guess what? They're offside.
But for some reason, the media, which is mostly ex-players and dinosaurs, think everything is a travesty and VAR is to blame so they keep pushing this narrative.
The ref calls a penalty because he thought there was contact, VAR says "you might want to take a look, it looks minimal". Ref checks, stands by his decision, penalty stands. Where is the fecking controversy in that?
Funeral atmosphere on BT now.
Funeral atmosphere on BT now.
yes Brighton won today, but football lost last night at Old TraffordFuneral atmosphere on BT now.
Great stuff from Joleon Lescott there. Liverpool are still in the title race, but Utd aren’t, apparently.
They will probably still mention that penalty decision last night amidst the post match reaction.
Everyone is worried the Devil might be awakening from his slumber sooner than they would have liked.Welcome to the Europa League on their advert, you cheeky little feckers
Agreed on both points. Jake Humphries is a bit of a smarmy git anyway, but he definitely fancies himself as one of the lads rather than just the presenter. He's even included on the pre-match predictions along with the pundits. The CL coverage is a lot more tolerable, mainly because he's replaced by the much more likeable Gary Lineker, and the 'ladz' rhetoric makes way for some actual analysis. Rio is a good pundit, Hargreaves is decent, and less Robbie Savage is a bonus as well.Trouble with Jake Humphries is that he thinks he is one of the pundits. He keeps butting in with his opinion when it is the pundits opinion that people tune in to hear. I am actually impressed with Kelly Cates on Sky ( I know she is Kenny' daughter), she will put a question out there and let the pundits discuss it, then when that is done, moves onto the next point. That is professional.
As they would say if it was us. 'Isn't that squads are for?'Just said on BT this bad run should be taken into context Liverpool are playing without TEN, yes TEN first team players. What the duck is this nonsense I keep hearing.
Maybe they re counting Alison and Thiago too )Just said on BT this bad run should be taken into context Liverpool are playing without TEN, yes TEN first team players. What the duck is this nonsense I keep hearing.
And Mane.Maybe they re counting Alison and Thiago too )