1) Even going by your somewhat disputable opinion here, that makes 12 months. He joined in January, was excellent the remainder of that season and then according to you for only half of the next one. I think that's wide of the mark but even if it isn't you're being disingenuous and it juat comes across like you're itching to criticise a player to the point you'll twist truth to do it, which IS childish.
2) If a player is having to run 60 yards behind the ball to make a challenge that means the midfield is not doing its job. Bruno plays as a no10. He could not make the challenge but then we concede chances and goals due to players running unchallenged into our box. I would prefer if our team and particularly midfield structure was solid enough that Bruno (among others) weren't making those types of challenges multiple times a game. Where I would criticise him is that part of the reason the problem develops is because he too often let's a player past him with pathetically little resistance which then leads to a counter attack.
3) I don't care about Statman Dave. It might be a thing but someone's opinion does not hold more value just because they call themselves "statman". Anyone can look at stats. He's no different from anyone on here who might be biased towards or against certain players or just have a differing opinion on them
4) No I think you are just talking rubbish here. Who the hell is beans? Lingard was criticised because he was rubbish, behaved like an idiot and acted like a spiteful baby about the club on social media. He also, it turns out, isn't good enough for Nottingham Forest. I can't think of a single player who's made a career out of being a "man on the street". Rooney was ugly and chavvy as hell and is probably the most unfairly criticised footballer in the history of Redcafe. Fernandes is among the most criticised players on this forum and at the club. Often for completely fabricated reasons like pretending he asked to be subbed off vs Liverpool. Now you are apparently criticising him because you think he escapes criticism due to having an ugly face. This makes you sound like a crazy person
1.It isn’t twisting the truth…Within five weeks of signing him we didn’t play for three months. We then played two months and didn’t play again for another two months. If you’d class that as 8 months of football, I’d say that’s up to you. It certainly isn’t childish to look at Covid as an anomaly and take the football out of the time rather than include five months where no football was played.
As already suggested take the general consensus of match day threads at the time. It won’t be wide of the mark. If it says he was brilliant he will have been.
2. The midfield is often out of position when the wrong pass is played at the wrong time, or because one of them decides to lie on the floor for ten seconds then jump up and run half the length of the pitch. On Wednesday he had more impact with a better midfield around him but still had a pass completion of only 66%
3.Totally agree. Doesn’t change the fact that some peoples opinions seem to be based upon these tweets as seen over the past couple of days once again.
4.Ridiculous response. If you think unconscious bias and grouping doesn’t exist and isn’t a basic human instinct then you’re wrong. One of the factors that absolutely goes in Bruno’s favour is that the general fan can relate to him in ways that they can’t with other examples given. You keep ignoring parts of my posts in favour of picking out points that I’m not making. Obviously you aren’t that stupid but hey ho. If I go with the examples you have given….
Rooney, absolute man on the street appeal…It doesn’t mean he would never be criticised, it meant that it was only after he held the team back for a long time due to a massive decline and playing in CM where he wasn’t very good as his legs had gone, held the club and manager to ransoms twice and tried to sign for City and Chelsea that he even started to receive criticism. He was probably the most universally loved player at the club until his last few seasons. People literally claimed he was better than Ronaldo, even when Ronaldo was scoring 40 goals a season, based purely on regard. Ronaldo had to score 40 goals a season and be outstanding where Rooney would score 15 league goals on average and 20 overall with goals coming in batches and long barren spells most seasons without criticism until he declined. As for trying to sign for City or Chelsea, of course that would bring criticism but I’ve seen much worse for much less, on the flip side Rooney had done enough at those points to be afforded a pass, where others had not. I still suggest it’s not the only factor in play with the criticism though.
Lingard, again pointing out the last few months of his time as the overall picture isn’t doing you any favours as it makes you look disingenuous and childish. He is a player who came through the ranks and was a very decent squad player and at times first team regular for around 7 years. Until the club decided not to accept a reasonable offer for him, keep him and didn’t play him, he’d been no problem for any manager and had scored in two cup finals. An absolute stunning winner in an FA Cup final. He was never my favourite player but he was a good squad player for us and the rest of the criticism you have posted highlights the point I’m making. People didn’t like him for reasons that have nothing to do with football. Some of the threads and posts about what he wore and what events he went to were disgraceful. The criticism here came years before he showed any displeasure at being at United. Not sure what his decline at Forest has to do with how fans viewed his dress sense five years ago either, nobody is saying he should still be at the club. The point is he was disliked for non football related issues like personality and flamboyance.
Fernandes is criticised by some for his performances, but what is the reason that the general public, media and masses of United fans are ignorant to his performances? Why is his petulance accepted. Would people accept some of the other players mentioned behaving in a manner that puts their teammates under pressure and leaves them a man down because they haven’t got a free kick they wanted…on a regular basis. I don’t believe so…but why do they accept it of Bruno when they wouldnt of Nani? Why is it not highlighted at all when Bruno lets someone run of him and they score, yet other players have been highlighted any time a player was anywhere near them. You bring up one incident in the 7-0 at Liverpool but ignore his behaviour in that game which led Neville to conclude he wanted to come off. I can’t remember a more self serving display of petulance from a United player in a game than Bruno….in a 7-0 at Anfield. Perhaps Neil Webb when he walked off the pitch at OT after being substituted to a chorus of boos?
A lot of the incidents here led to Liverpool attacking while Bruno moaned at the ref, the last incident is an absolute and utter disgrace. To me Bruno hasn’t done anything to warrant being dissolved of criticism, but outside of Neville it was largely ignored. Nobody mentions it anymore. Other players mentioned would have be strung up for that. Pogba for example got criticised for being sent off for a clumsy tackle after a hospital pass from Bruno…claims he got himself sent off because he didn’t want to play. Rooney & Bruno would’ve been lauded for the tackle and Pogba slated for the pass…But again why is this?