TheRedHearted
Full Member
Didn’t seem like a good idea to me. I guess we are lack of options but the guy is too petty, I do admit I’ve seen a upswing in better behavior from him. Wouldn’t be surprised if this is why rashford is upset and moody
I don't see an alternative.
He is the best of a bad bunch.
Possibly, although I'm much more confident that Roy Keane the player would hate Roy Keane the pundit.
Eriksen, or Sweden's captain Lindelof?Going through last season, when after the iffy start the mood was late geeky very positive, especially once Ronaldo had fecked off and during that really good form and winning the League Cup, he was the obvious choice. When things are bright and rosy Bruno takes on responsibility and carries himself well and looks and plays like a leader. There was no other choice to be made.
However. Now the proverbial is hitting the fan, his petulant childish tantrum-filled behaviour is really coming to the fore again, and is highlighted even more under the microscope of being Manchester United captain.
I don’t want him to be our captain, I don’t like the idea of him being our captain, I never have. I also think he was the correct (only) choice when that decision was made. Hun being captain is indicative of where our squad is and how rudderless we are, without a ‘proper’ leader.
Who else would/could it have been?
De Gea
I always thought the original plan was to offer him a new deal as a good will gesture, but sign a new first choice. He couldn’t have been captain for that alone, imagine Onana coming in with the pressure of not only replacing our keeper of 12 years, but that guy also being club captain and watching your every move from the bench.
He also never really struck me as captain material anyway, and he’s not here now so it’s not worth talking about anymore.
Shaw
I wouldn’t have hated it, he’s the current longest serving player now isn’t he? I’m not sure he’s an obvious captain, and as good as I think he is, he’s not spent a lot of his 9 seasons at United as a bonafide starter. He’s also injured a lot. If we were to change it now he’s probably who I’d pick, but I don’t think he could have been given it over the summer.
Maguire
ETH clearly wanted him gone in the summer, the captaincy had to be taken off him.
Varane
He’s won a lot, seen a lot, has buckets of experience, has worked with some great leaders and is clearly well respected. However, is he himself a natural leader? I’m not sure. He’s also never fit.
Martinez
I think he’s the next captain. Don’t think you could have given it to him after one season, especially when his English still isn’t great. I think there’s a leader and a captain in there, but it’s too early to give it to him now.
Casemiro
Similar to Varane. I think I see more of a leader in Casemiro, but he’s also older so not necessarily a long-term fix. He also can’t speak English. If you changed the captaincy now I wouldn’t hate him as a choice, but it’s not a perfect fix.
Rashford
I’m sure he’d love to be United captain, but I think giving it to him would split the fanbase even more than Bruno has. He blows so hot and cold already, and people (ridiculously) blame that on what he does away from football. I don’t hate the idea of him being a vice-captain and wearing the armband occasionally, but he can’t be captain.
Am I missing anyone? Nobody there has an argument big enough to warrant stripping Bruno of the captaincy 3 months in to the season. It’s not worth the upheaval, might as well park the conversation for now and come back to it in the summer.
Eriksen, or Sweden's captain Lindelof?
This sums it up really. It's not that big a deal in honesty though, leaders will lead if they wear an armband or not - I always think you want a CB or CM as they will be able to be chatting with the ref a lot and see everything on the pitch. Would love it if ETH came out wearing it next game.Nothing to discuss here, has to be him. The fact that there's no viable alternative is such an indictment.
Can there be no captain?Nothing to discuss here, has to be him. The fact that there's no viable alternative is such an indictment.
Neither of them are or should be remotely close to consistent starters for us.Eriksen, or Sweden's captain Lindelof?
We could make someone like Jonny Evans the official club captain, and then say there's a bunch of "vice captains" and just rotate around Varane, Maguire, Fernandes etc. whenever they're playing and Evans isn't.Can there be no captain?
That’s total bollocks. Keane saved our arse and gets the team going countless times over countless situations, and was the heart beat of the team which dominate English football for many years, yet you just pick his worst disciplinary moment to compare with Bruno, who tends to disappear in every big game and every tough moment.
Really? For me it'd be Shaw, and then one of Varane or Martinez.Should be either Shaw or Rashford. But it should be on rotation until the right character emerges. Who is the City captain? It changes. Walker. KDB. Rodri. All have been captain.
If there is a natural leader, great. If not, them rotate it.
Our issue is that we lack players with character ( being petulant is childish, not a sign of commitment). I don't see any players who want to stand up for the club. And I don't think the players trust each other.
Needs a big turnaround.
It doesn't really matter who the captain is, as long as there's leaders on the pitch. The captain thing is more ceremonial in football. It's not like cricket where the captain is effectively the in game manager. I think the Italian national team gives the captaincy to the most capped player or oldest player.We could make someone like Jonny Evans the official club captain, and then say there's a bunch of "vice captains" and just rotate around Varane, Maguire, Fernandes etc. whenever they're playing and Evans isn't.
A convoluted way to take the official captaincy away from Fernandes?
To an extent -- the captain is (or at least should) be the only player on the football pitch for your team who is allowed a direct dialogue with the referee. It helps a little when your captain is more on the endearing, charismatic side than the whiny ratty side.It doesn't really matter who the captain is, as long as there's leaders on the pitch. The captain thing is more ceremonial in football. It's not like cricket where the captain is effectively the in game manager. I think the Italian national team gives the captaincy to the most capped player or oldest player.
Jesus Christ this has got to be a piss takeI still say Rashford. It'll improve his game and develop his personality. He isn't a youth player anymore. And he stands for a lot about what is right about the club (but also is getting sucked into the more selfish, lack of care and respect that has crept in over the years). In many ways I don't blame him, as the likes of Pogba and Lindgard should have been better examples when he was coming through the ranks.
Give him the armband and tell him to tear into people and not feel obliged to keep everyone happy. Players will respect you as long as you perform, give 100% and are seen to be fair.
They aren't simply good enough that's the main reason for lack of success on field , we had plenty of so called leaders on the field during Moyes reign but they couldn't stop things from unravelling .Bruno's the captain in the absence of a credible alternative. The best of slim pickings. It's interesting the lack of success for United coincides with a lack of leaders on the pitch.
So the guy who ambles around, cant be bothered to press and is woefully out of form should be captain? Is this satire?I still say Rashford. It'll improve his game and develop his personality. He isn't a youth player anymore. And he stands for a lot about what is right about the club (but also is getting sucked into the more selfish, lack of care and respect that has crept in over the years). In many ways I don't blame him, as the likes of Pogba and Lindgard should have been better examples when he was coming through the ranks.
Give him the armband and tell him to tear into people and not feel obliged to keep everyone happy. Players will respect you as long as you perform, give 100% and are seen to be fair.
Laughable.I still say Rashford. It'll improve his game and develop his personality. He isn't a youth player anymore. And he stands for a lot about what is right about the club (but also is getting sucked into the more selfish, lack of care and respect that has crept in over the years). In many ways I don't blame him, as the likes of Pogba and Lindgard should have been better examples when he was coming through the ranks.
Give him the armband and tell him to tear into people and not feel obliged to keep everyone happy. Players will respect you as long as you perform, give 100% and are seen to be fair.
whiny ratty side.
So the guy who ambles around, cant be bothered to press and is woefully out of form should be captain? Is this satire?