Britain's Got Talent Final

He had a bit of a story. Failed last year and wanted to win to pay his Mummy back. Prefered Signature. They were ace.
 
Signature should have won.

They were clearly the most entertaining, and talented.
 
Signature should have won.

They were clearly the most entertaining, and talented.

Agreed, they were quality. The kid just won because people felt sorry for him.

Signature:
 
Most entertaining I'd agree but most talented? I'd choose the 12 year old girl based on talent, and the ladies with the electric string instruments :drool: well two of them anyway.
 
My bird made me watch this last night. Jesus fecking christ.

This show should be renamed ''Britain has no Talent Whatsoever, Here's the Proof''




























































(I did quite like Signature though........... and the dancing dog)
 
Signature have the entertainment value, and the Queen would have liked them. She had MJ music played once during the changing of the guards.

I wanted the choir boy to win, what a voice.

The birds with the instrument were fit though.
 
Escala were an afront to classical music. And woefully out of tune for a good portion of their preformance. A slightly better looking version of the Star Wars keyboard guy.
 
bit harsh IMO, but am just not happy at the fact that they are actual pro's (or semi-pro's)
 
Signature were a better dance act than George.

Andrew was good but Faryl was better.

Escala were good I thought, and a bit different - and if I was that way inclined I'd have fancied the tall blonde girl....really pretty she is.

But they were all human doing what some humans are good at...the dog was the best because dogs shouldn't do that kind of stuff!

I liked the little kids too - they were annoyingly cute, but pretty good for their age.
 
Signature were a better dance act than George.

Andrew was good but Faryl was better.

Escala were good I thought, and a bit different - and if I was that way inclined I'd have fancied the tall blonde girl....really pretty she is.

But they were all human doing what some humans are good at...the dog was the best because dogs shouldn't do that kind of stuff!

I liked the little kids too - they were annoyingly cute, but pretty good for their age.

12 year old girls can't generally sing that well. She'll be a multimillionaire by the time she's 18 anyway I reckon.
 
the fat kid in the top 3 was a joke ..

thought signature were the best , but sampson wasnt bad ..

glad that fat kid didnt win ..

the girl or the dog shouldve been in the top 3 instead of that fat one
 
Escala were an afront to classical music. And woefully out of tune for a good portion of their preformance. A slightly better looking version of the Star Wars keyboard guy.

That Star Wars guy was hilarious.

I wont have a bad word said about him
 
FFS Damn you signature, same act. No chance of winning.

They all do the act from the audition again in the final, I think. Saw it last year and it was like that.

I thought George Sampson was pretty average, I've seen loads of dancers like him here.

Signature were fecking quality in the audition.

I wanted Escala to win. Their semi-final performance was fantastic.

And yea, the Star Wars guy was quality. Per Diem were very good, and if what's written on Wikipedia is true, that's totally lame
 
escala were out of tune in the finals , but their semi final performance was :drool:


signature , i like it a lot more when its just suleman performing , the fat guy doesnt do much ... the michael jackson bit is the best

star wars guy was the best .. shouldve won