Jazz
Just in case anyone missed it. I don't like Mount.
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 31,542
Never thought I'd see this thread up so soon
I also think Mahrez was, and is, better. But Grealish is great. Exciting. I’d have taken him and moved Martial on. Martial is probably more talented but he’s never been as constantly consistent.
It just seems daft to announce a £100m purchase before you agree a fee for Kane though. Especially as the pair are not miles apart in age. In the last 3 years Kane has played in a CL final, won the golden boot at the World Cup, captained his country to a Euros final after finishing top of goals and assists charts IN THE SAME LEAGUE as the club that wants him.
Why do Spurs look at all of that and think the number should be closer to £100 than £200?
United should bid £160m just to ensure City have to pay it. New rich Cnuts living up to the ‘knowing the price of everything but the value of nothing’ line. Plastic twats.
Didn't expect them to be watching our game. Varane presentation probably killed them on the inside, completely dwarfs anything they've doneNever thought I'd see this thread up so soon
We don’t have to bid. We just have to enquire about him and tell them how much were willing to pay. Thankfully. As I’d rather Haaland next season.I also think Mahrez was, and is, better. But Grealish is great. Exciting. I’d have taken him and moved Martial on. Martial is probably more talented but he’s never been as constantly consistent.
It just seems daft to announce a £100m purchase before you agree a fee for Kane though. Especially as the pair are not miles apart in age. In the last 3 years Kane has played in a CL final, won the golden boot at the World Cup, captained his country to a Euros final after finishing top of goals and assists charts IN THE SAME LEAGUE as the club that wants him.
Why do Spurs look at all of that and think the number should be closer to £100 than £200?
United should bid £160m just to ensure City have to pay it. New rich Cnuts living up to the ‘knowing the price of everything but the value of nothing’ line. Plastic twats.
I agree, even though that's the last thing they should be concentrating on! Anyway, a nice end to the weekend for usDidn't expect them to be watching our game. Varane presentation probably killed them on the inside, completely dwarfs anything they've done
Ah I was looking for a post you had reacted to here in the thread.Some birtie said they were banned from the caf.
I don't know how we are expected to compete this year when the Rags have a nett spend of over £110 million while so far we have only been able to spend a nett £40 million
Moving Bernardo on for Grealish is a 5-10% improvement at carrying the ball forward and drawing fowls and that’s it.
Talk about a grouse exaggeration!What type of fowl are we talking here; grouse, turkeys, waterfowl?
What type of fowl are we talking here; grouse, turkeys, waterfowl?
I don't know how we are expected to compete this year when the Rags have a nett spend of over £110 million while so far we have only been able to spend a nett £40 million
I have two questions about City
Having that squad, who do you go for in transfer market?
At which point you just buy players so that others can't get them?
I have two questions about City
Having that squad, who do you go for in transfer market?
At which point you just buy players so that others can't get them?
That last bit is on the nose. It looks nice but it's fake so people just don't like it as much.They just can’t stand hearing about their spending. It will soon be a decade since their first title and everybody knows all of their success has been inorganic.
City is simply an ugly girl with a plastic surger and they KNOW it.
He’s just another classy midfielder in a squad that’s already packed with them. I’d argue Mahrez was a far more complete and dangerous attacking player when City got him. Moving Bernardo on for Grealish is a 5-10% improvement at carrying the ball forward and drawing fowls and that’s it. 100 million upgrade? Not by any stretch.
What type of fowl are we talking here; grouse, turkeys, waterfowl?
Probably Alex Crook, he's a wanker basically. Laugh now but he spent most of last season laying into OleWas anyone listening to talksport 25 minutes back? A Man City fan was interrupted by the presenter who told them “this isn’t a fairytale, you aren’t Leceister, you are an Oil club financed by a state, there’s no fairytale, it isn’t real”
I'm sure they'll take better care of their grammar and spelling from heron in.What type of fowl are we talking here; grouse, turkeys, waterfowl?
The point about grealish trying to stay in his feet and beat the man is valid really. Other than that, they're batshit........
.........
Can we stop parroting on about grammar please?I'm sure they'll take better care of their grammar and spelling from heron in.
How rude. Well I hope you have a pheasant evening good sir.Can we stop parroting on about grammar please?
Probably Alex Crook, he's a wanker basically. Laugh now but he spent most of last season laying into Ole
Sounds like a primary school argument. Only difference is that you could still like the kidsMost talksport presenters just try and wind up the people who call in. If they're not ranting, the presenter will argue with them and try to get them to rant. If they're calling up to rant, the presenter will just egg them on. If they're calling up to argue, the presenter will mock them.