Bluemoon goes into Meltdown

Never thought I'd see this thread up so soon :lol:
 
I also think Mahrez was, and is, better. But Grealish is great. Exciting. I’d have taken him and moved Martial on. Martial is probably more talented but he’s never been as constantly consistent.

It just seems daft to announce a £100m purchase before you agree a fee for Kane though. Especially as the pair are not miles apart in age. In the last 3 years Kane has played in a CL final, won the golden boot at the World Cup, captained his country to a Euros final after finishing top of goals and assists charts IN THE SAME LEAGUE as the club that wants him.

Why do Spurs look at all of that and think the number should be closer to £100 than £200?

United should bid £160m just to ensure City have to pay it. New rich Cnuts living up to the ‘knowing the price of everything but the value of nothing’ line. Plastic twats.

:lol: :lol:

160,000,001 Suarez job. You’re correct though. If Grealish is 100 Kane is 140/50
 
I also think Mahrez was, and is, better. But Grealish is great. Exciting. I’d have taken him and moved Martial on. Martial is probably more talented but he’s never been as constantly consistent.

It just seems daft to announce a £100m purchase before you agree a fee for Kane though. Especially as the pair are not miles apart in age. In the last 3 years Kane has played in a CL final, won the golden boot at the World Cup, captained his country to a Euros final after finishing top of goals and assists charts IN THE SAME LEAGUE as the club that wants him.

Why do Spurs look at all of that and think the number should be closer to £100 than £200?

United should bid £160m just to ensure City have to pay it. New rich Cnuts living up to the ‘knowing the price of everything but the value of nothing’ line. Plastic twats.
We don’t have to bid. We just have to enquire about him and tell them how much were willing to pay. Thankfully. As I’d rather Haaland next season.

Oh and completely agreed on the first part of your post. Daft spending that on Grealish and then as you say expect Spurs to value Kane in the same ballpark.
 
Didn't expect them to be watching our game. Varane presentation probably killed them on the inside, completely dwarfs anything they've done
I agree, even though that's the last thing they should be concentrating on! Anyway, a nice end to the weekend for us :D
 
" Meh 1 defeat. Got the other 19 teams to beat."

#maths
 
Was anyone listening to talksport 25 minutes back? A Man City fan was interrupted by the presenter who told them “this isn’t a fairytale, you aren’t Leceister, you are an Oil club financed by a state, there’s no fairytale, it isn’t real”
 
I have two questions about City
Having that squad, who do you go for in transfer market?
At which point you just buy players so that others can't get them?
 
I have two questions about City
Having that squad, who do you go for in transfer market?
At which point you just buy players so that others can't get them?

Maybe do that in a thread about City, not Bluemoon ;)
 
They just can’t stand hearing about their spending. It will soon be a decade since their first title and everybody knows all of their success has been inorganic.
City is simply an ugly girl with a plastic surger and they KNOW it.
That last bit is on the nose. It looks nice but it's fake so people just don't like it as much.
 
He’s just another classy midfielder in a squad that’s already packed with them. I’d argue Mahrez was a far more complete and dangerous attacking player when City got him. Moving Bernardo on for Grealish is a 5-10% improvement at carrying the ball forward and drawing fowls and that’s it. 100 million upgrade? Not by any stretch.

Pep kinda reminds me of Wenger (far better obviously) in that he can never have enough of those classy midfielders even when other areas are bigger issues.

He'd play 11 of them if he could.
 
Was anyone listening to talksport 25 minutes back? A Man City fan was interrupted by the presenter who told them “this isn’t a fairytale, you aren’t Leceister, you are an Oil club financed by a state, there’s no fairytale, it isn’t real”
Probably Alex Crook, he's a wanker basically. Laugh now but he spent most of last season laying into Ole
 
They shot themselves in the arse buying Grealish. 1. he wasnt needed 2. i dont see the hype

3. Levy will just think well release clause or not, you clearly think he is worth 100m or you wouldnt have triggered it.... Kane is worth so much more, give us 160 minimum or off you feck


I still think Kane ends up staying now. Too late in the window for me, and all selling clubs will know spurs are flush with cash, and hike the prices. City should have done Kane first, then Grealish
 
5 homogeneous attacking players. I hope teams will finally figure out how to deal with them.
 
Probably Alex Crook, he's a wanker basically. Laugh now but he spent most of last season laying into Ole

Most talksport presenters just try and wind up the people who call in. If they're not ranting, the presenter will argue with them and try to get them to rant. If they're calling up to rant, the presenter will just egg them on. If they're calling up to argue, the presenter will mock them.
 
Most talksport presenters just try and wind up the people who call in. If they're not ranting, the presenter will argue with them and try to get them to rant. If they're calling up to rant, the presenter will just egg them on. If they're calling up to argue, the presenter will mock them.
Sounds like a primary school argument. Only difference is that you could still like the kids
 
You’ll find it hard to find anyone except the odd City fan that actually disagrees with what was said though.
 
Oh please. This is bound to be the biggest meltdown since Pogba, when they deleted the whole thread. :lol:
 
I remember reading the Sanchez posts with great joy when it looked like they were signing him.

Obviously that turned to a crock of shit but have better hopes here :lol:
 
City have sonehow managed to feck up signing messi, ronaldo and kane in the same window.

Inject it in my veins.