Bluemoon goes into Meltdown
- Thread starter Logan!
- Start date
Aguerooooops.
Aguero is like a freed bird now and he's going to sing!
So that's 2 of their 'Legends' they have turned on because he spoke a little truth. 
Just goes to show, the money was far more important than the prestige of the club.
Just goes to show, the money was far more important than the prestige of the club.Except for Robbie Keane, who exclusively signed for "the best club in the world" every 18 months or so.
City themselves dream of being Barcelona, why can’t Aguero dream of playing for the real thing
His brother threw Pep under the bus right after the CL final alsoLove the fact that he put Pep in a line of fire too.
Why would Aguero out Pep like that though. I mean, he said it in confidence not for all the journos.
And they get battered by Man United like Tommy Lee did to Pam.
Why are they getting in a frenzy over Pep saying Barca are the best club in the world. He's a a Barca man, he's a huge fan. If City played Barca, he'd be managing City while wishing Barca to win ffs haha
That was after the video wasn't it?
I heard you say
Has it only just now dawned on some of these clowns that Guardiola and most of the players are only at City for anything other than purely financial reasons?
what financial reasons? They're earning the same as they would at any other club, it even says so on their paycheck.
With their modest salary, they can afford a holiday in the Caymans or perhaps Panama.
Do they think they're bigger than Barca??
They look like they are fighting a war in the media where the ammunition is who can pretend to respect the other one more.
That was maybe a parting shot following Pep taking it upon himself to make it public Sergio was going to Barcelona.
The difference in how our ex greats talk about the club, compared to theirs...
Are they seriously deluded enough to think they’re as big as Barca? They’ve been dominating the league and I barely even run into fans of theirs, or see them online, whereas Barca shirts and fans are everywhere.
They think they're bigger than us, so i guess they do...
The shock and horror of the wee little city supporters discovering that players just view them as a small plastic club. Wtf did they expect!?
Mes que un plastic
The shock and horror of the wee little city supporters discovering that players just view them as a small plastic club. Wtf did they expect!?
It’s only because the world (and Aguero and Pep) don’t know how many fans used to attend their matches at Maine Road even when they were in the lower divisions. If they knew that, they’d know they’re the biggest club in the universe
Let's never forget when Robinho thought he was flying in to sign for United and was then told it was City he was signing for.
He didn't even know there was a second team in Manchester
He didn't even know there was a second team in Manchester
Talk about being catfished
People might not like it but Aguero will not in time be remembered as one of the world greats. The reason being that he spent his career at Man City, an oil club. It is unfair and a few players transcend the levels but the real greats get remembered for amazing moments on the biggest stages in the biggest stadiums. Deep down, or not by looks of it, Aguero knows he'd have possibly become a global legend after a decade at Barca. Likewise Neymar at psg compared to if he stayed at barca or went elsewhere.
This isn't anti city sentiment, even Alan Shearer outside England isn't ever mentioned in the same breath as other greats and he's the all time top scorer. Its incredibly harsh but it's the way it is. Ig Aguero achieves something great in 2 years at barca it would cement a legacy far greater than his time in England which is incredible given that goal. There is simply no weight of history behind a plastic club
This isn't anti city sentiment, even Alan Shearer outside England isn't ever mentioned in the same breath as other greats and he's the all time top scorer. Its incredibly harsh but it's the way it is. Ig Aguero achieves something great in 2 years at barca it would cement a legacy far greater than his time in England which is incredible given that goal. There is simply no weight of history behind a plastic club
Catfished, they were shit at that point it was closer to human trafficking than catfishing
what financial reasons? They're earning the same as they would at any other club, it even says so on their paycheck.
With their modest salary, they can afford a holiday in the Caymans or perhaps Panama.
Which one though?
Why are they mad and can’t accept the reality that their manager Pep is always being honest? Nothing to hide and Pep doesn’t need to lie but only speaks the truth. City is still nothing compares to United and Barca. You don’t build something to overcome the big boys in small amount of years, may be you will get there in 30-50 years, may be.
The only one they get. They may stumble somewhere over access to some weird offshore bank account or whatever and be really happy they found it, but that has nothing to do with them playing for City.
They love their girlfriend analogies over there. Here’s one from a while back which captures City fans perfectly.
So there’s three guys in a bar, regailing each other about how hot their wives/girlfriends are. Let’s call them United, Liverpool and Arsenal. In walks two fat ugly forty year old (and until half an hour ago) virgins. Let’s call these newcomers City and Chelsea. They’ve just paid £10000 to get their cherries popped. They try to join in the conversation, as if their recent conquests are comparable in any way. Everyone else in the bar laughs uncontrollably. The end.
So there’s three guys in a bar, regailing each other about how hot their wives/girlfriends are. Let’s call them United, Liverpool and Arsenal. In walks two fat ugly forty year old (and until half an hour ago) virgins. Let’s call these newcomers City and Chelsea. They’ve just paid £10000 to get their cherries popped. They try to join in the conversation, as if their recent conquests are comparable in any way. Everyone else in the bar laughs uncontrollably. The end.
Look, I'm not a City fan, but I respectfully disagree with your posting.
First of all, Man Utd have a great history - the late 60's (also a golden time for the blue half too, except you went one better with the European Cup). But in the 1990s and into the nougties under Sir Alex Ferguson, was Utd's best period and I suppose it is becoming history, because of the struggles the club has gone through in the last 7 years. Man City are the top-dogs in Manchester now, they are making their history now (and not always successfully as we saw at the weekend). But because they have owners who put money into the club, whilst Man Utd's owners do the opposite, I see a lot of jealousy and rage and hence this accusation of not having 'history'. It is also 'jealousy' to go on about their transfer spending because a) when Sir Alex was running things Man Utd. were always in for the top players and paid top transfer fees e.g. Rio Ferdinand in 2000 18 million - thats 21 years ago and b) even in these difficult years Utd. have still spent big e.g. Pogba 89 million & Maguire 80 million - both significantly more expensive than the most Man City have paid: Ruben Dias @ 64 million.
I have to also say that the thing about Ageuro not being seen as a world great sounds like sour grapes to me. Perhaps you'd have preferred him to spend a decade at Barca rather than with the blue-half of Manchester! You have to remember that in the global media age in which we live, the most popular league is the premier league and for ten years he has been scoring goals and smashing records and his last kick finish in 2012 will never be forgotten. It is also, if I maybe a bit cheeky here, at nines years 'old', a bit of 'history'?
P.S. My team have history too, we won the top league 3 years running! Trouble was it was 1924, 1925 and 1926!
Good post, well reasoned, deserves a like IMO.
I agree with you,
interesting concept, where does 'History' start for football fans? Is there a cut off that means it has to be more than X ago? pre cash injection? City, like it or not, are winning trophies, regardless of where the money has come from. History is being made, whether you think it's good or bad.
Chelsea were winning things in the late 90's and early 2000's and then it took off nearly 20 years ago. Yet even after 20 years we're still derided with the 'no history' claim. Of course Chelsea have history, it might not be as successful as some clubs going back 100 years but why does that matter? Does winning the FA Cup 100 years ago in a completely different footballing world bear the same relevance now?
I think it's a level of elitism from the traditional clubs, unwilling to accept the new status quo it gives them a way to distinguish themselves
Yes Liverpool and Utd's success was organic to begin with, Chelsea and City can't say that and i understand this part erks people, i get it but that doesn't change actual history does it?