InfiniteBoredom
Full Member
I like how he wrote 'many thanks and kind regard' after 'fob off' though
That's past delusion. He's the sort of person the police find dead in his flat, with writing smeared on the wall in shit.
They look like they are making some very savvy decisions recently. Like a professional outfit when whiskey nose was there.
Next season will be competitive on finishing top 4. A giant is destined to miss out
You look like you are making some very dodgy comments lately, now go back sadcafe you raggy twat
Reply from a poster named Sheikh Khalid something.
From there BBC bias against City thread, same guy:
Reply from a poster named Sheikh Khalid something.
Imagine being that bothered about something like that. Jesus.From there BBC bias against City thread, same guy:
The stuff about BBC not mentioning Martial's fee is just wrong. Him and United got hammered by the press, BBC significantly included, about the fee paid for him. He was getting written off by everyone before he'd even kicked a ball in a red shirt, all because of the fee.
Just do a quick search for his name at the top of the BBC Sport page, pull up any article relating to him or a match report in which he scored a goal, and there it is.
"The France international became the world's most expensive teenage player when he signed from Monaco in September for £36m, which could rise to £58m" is pasted on to almost every single one.
I struggle to find one that doesn't at least mention the £36m. I actually can't find one. Same goes for Memphis. The fee quoted is still £31m, because the BBC don't know the difference between GPB and Euros, and it's mentioned on every article about him.
The BBC has never written "21 year old Martial", because he isn't 21. Fanny.
But he isn't. His name is a reference to our European triumph against Barca in 1984.@Barca84 nice to see even Barcelona fans know they're a pain in the arse.
Whoosh.But he isn't. His name is a reference to our European triumph against Barca in 1984.
Perhaps you could explain why there was a "Mourinho Man United squad selection" tool, when he hadn't even been appointed as United manager, but there was no Conte, Wenger, Guardiola, Klopp, Hughes, Ranieri, Pardew, or Allardyce squad selectors?
It's hard to live in the shadow of United. Cannot blame them for going loco every now and again.
According to the leaked contract his fee was £27m and could rise to around £30m depending on clausesThe stuff about BBC not mentioning Martial's fee is just wrong. Him and United got hammered by the press, BBC significantly included, about the fee paid for him. He was getting written off by everyone before he'd even kicked a ball in a red shirt, all because of the fee.
Just do a quick search for his name at the top of the BBC Sport page, pull up any article relating to him or a match report in which he scored a goal, and there it is.
"The France international became the world's most expensive teenage player when he signed from Monaco in September for £36m, which could rise to £58m" is pasted on to almost every single one.
I struggle to find one that doesn't at least mention the £36m. I actually can't find one. Same goes for Memphis. The fee quoted is still £31m, because the BBC don't know the difference between GPB and Euros, and it's mentioned on every article about him.
The BBC has never written "21 year old Martial", because he isn't 21. Fanny.
Thing is, City are a nothing club! They could win the next 10 titles and champions leagues and United would still grab the headlines. Because everybody knows City are a false club. The club and fans that were in the old Div 3 and must have had crowds of 100k (every City fan I know claims they were there back then) has long gone...they're footballs version of the Harlem Globetrotters who are living in a permanent world of bitterness. All that money and they still can't get it quite right.From their BBC bias against City thread, same guy:
The giveaway is the season that Liverpool fecked it up, a week after the season finished no one cared about who'd won the league. If the dippers had won the media would still be going on about it now.
I've been a Bluemoon member since 2010 and post on there a fair bit.
There are some fantastic posters on there and some time total feckwits which I suppose reflects society as a whole.
Reds who pitch up there are treated with respect if they want to discuss rather than troll the forum. There will be the odd insult thrown out but often it is in jest.
Like Bobbymanc I also attempt to correct factual inaccuracies and misconceptions about City and try to not bite when some halfwit cannot get past the empty seats and sugar daddy jibes.
Rag cnut.I think it's a bit more stronger than that. I posted some poor guy who was attacked on his first post, which wasn't even contentious. I got banned after 2!!! How many United fans actually post on there, out of interest?? I think "the odd insult" is putting it mildly don't you think? There was even a gif zooming in on Fergie who's hands were shaking a bit. The comments were quite personal and insensitive.
You and Bobbymanc may be decent posters on there but the other fantastic posters you mention are definitely in the minority, from what I've seen. No mods challenging the posts whatsoever?
Outrageous from the BBC. No wonder City fans are in uproar.From their BBC bias against City thread, same guy:
Bluemoon suffers from a lack of newbie system regardless its a poor forum, I'm on Mancityfans.net much more calmer.
C*NTS!!!! theyre all c*nts out there!!!!
Filthy Scum, Kamikaze Urinals, Rat Infested Old Toilet.
The site is moderated. Many have had bans (myself included) when we overstep the mark.I think it's a bit more stronger than that. I posted some poor guy who was attacked on his first post, which wasn't even contentious. I got banned after 2!!! How many United fans actually post on there, out of interest?? I think "the odd insult" is putting it mildly don't you think? There was even a gif zooming in on Fergie who's hands were shaking a bit. The comments were quite personal and insensitive.
You and Bobbymanc may be decent posters on there but the other fantastic posters you mention are definitely in the minority, from what I've seen. No mods challenging the posts whatsoever?
they are a nothing club that won the lottery, nothoing more.
Ever heard of Billy Meredith, Matt Busby and Denis Law? They were happy enough to play for the nothoing (sic) club before they went to United.
Even when they are winning titles, its us that sells papers and draws clicks.
Is it really something to swank about that United (and Liverpool) have such a grip on the sports media that any success that other clubs achieve is glossed over or undermined in favour of the chosen two?
Remember the fuss about Moyes, LVG, Januzaj? All were hyped beyond belief and flopped. The clicks they generated ultimately backfired on United but so long as the sales, deals and numbers keep looking healthy that's the main thing, eh?
I'm sure it goes on sometimes.As a long time lurker on BM I have come to the conclusion, that most Reds on there are created by the moderators, each time they elect new mods there is an influx of 'new rags ' suddenly posting,they usually only last a few days until they vanish, wouldn't surprise me if it was some sort of initiation task all new mods have to undergo.