Sassy Colin
Death or the gladioli!
No thread on this?
Another big star heading for a fall?
Another big star heading for a fall?
I'm very, very uncomfortable with this idea that allegations are enough to discredit a public figure. Doesn't matter whether there were 100 people claiming that he raped each and every one of them. Apart from the fact that committing 99 crimes is not evidence that the 100th was committed by the same person... we don't base truth on how many people are saying it. How many people have independently claimed they have seen a UFO, or the Virgin Mary?
Shame that we will never know for sure whether Cosby is innocent or not. I'm not guessing.
Not sure either of those things are comparable with claiming to have been raped.
I'm very, very uncomfortable with this idea that allegations are enough to discredit a public figure. Doesn't matter whether there were 100 people claiming that he raped each and every one of them. Apart from the fact that committing 99 crimes is not evidence that the 100th was committed by the same person... we don't base truth on how many people are saying it. How many people have independently claimed they have seen a UFO, or the Virgin Mary?
Shame that we will never know for sure whether Cosby is innocent or not. I'm not guessing.
Ta-Nehesi Coates had a good piece on this today. Those defending him are taking the position that fifteen different women lied independently about a publicly adored figure while seeking no criminal or financial repercussions. It takes a lot of mental gymnastics to come down on Cosby's side.
Are you unsure about the Jimmy Savile case as well, then?In the Atlantic? I read that piece. I generally agree with his articles.
If I come across as defending Cosby, it is because I put myself in my shoes and realize that somehow, 15 people accusing me of doing something is enough proof in the eye of the public that I am guilty, which is a terrifying thought. The US has a long, dark history of black men getting lynched because of hearsay. That is not to say that the women are lying. I just don't have enough evidence to say for sure that either side is right or wrong. Nowadays, it just takes one accuser (cf Woody Allen and Mia Farrow)
I could also ask how is it possible that Bill Cosby raped 15 women, and not one single case made it to a judge in criminal court. That proves nothing though, we have come a long way in society from 20 years ago when sexual assault awareness was nowhere near today's standards.
I just don't know.
He's finished. Too many disparate women are turning up with damaging allegations, so he might as well retire and disappear.
Maybe it's just because I'm from the UK but I assumed he did that 20 years ago.
Are you unsure about the Jimmy Savile case as well, then?
He's finished. Too many disparate women are turning up with damaging allegations, so he might as well retire and disappear.
Apparently he is still doing comedy tours all over, and they're selling out.
Big fan of that one where he was a ghost.
Doubt he will do them for much longer. He won't want to deal with getting heckled, especially at his age.
The initial weight of the evidence was that so many people came forward with similar stories independently to the extent that you couldn't reasonably believe them all to be lying. After a while more and more came out, with third party witnesses also coming forward saying that many people knew he behaved like that... Never got anywhere near a court as far as I know, as he basically used his reputation as a great charity fundraiser (with an army of lawyers) to scare anyone who dared speak to the police. There's no physical evidence as far as I know, just an immense weight of independent testimony. Don't know the details of Cosby's allegations, I just disagree with the premise that we can never know one way or the other.I didn't follow the specifics of that case. Did it all come down to hearsay?
The initial weight of the evidence was that so many people came forward with similar stories independently to the extent that you couldn't reasonably believe them all to be lying. After a while more and more came out, with third party witnesses also coming forward saying that many people knew he behaved like that... Never got anywhere near a court as far as I know, as he basically used his reputation as a great charity fundraiser (with an army of lawyers) to scare anyone who dared speak to the police. There's no physical evidence as far as I know, just an immense weight of independent testimony. Don't know the details of Cosby's allegations, I just disagree with the premise that we can never know one way or the other.
I agree that numbers alone don't determine it, the content and consistencies play a huge part too. Sexual assault as a crime I think has a very uneasy relationship with "innocent until proven guilty", which I'm not sure can be said for any other offence. Very difficult one to solve adequately. In Savile's case I think it's well beyond reasonable doubt he was guilty, we'll have to see how this particular one develops.Fair enough, and it's a free world, with people free to make up their own mind. Public figures are not entitled to the public's affection and love.
On the bolded point, using the amount of accusers to decide whether someone did something or not, without any supporting evidence, seems very sketchy to me.
In the Atlantic? I read that piece. I generally agree with his articles.
If I come across as defending Cosby, it is because I put myself in my shoes and realize that somehow, 15 people accusing me of doing something is enough proof in the eye of the public that I am guilty, which is a terrifying thought. The US has a long, dark history of black men getting lynched because of hearsay. That is not to say that the women are lying. I just don't have enough evidence to say for sure that either side is right or wrong. Nowadays, it just takes one accuser (cf Woody Allen and Mia Farrow)
I could also ask how is it possible that Bill Cosby raped 15 women, and not one single case made it to a judge in criminal court. That proves nothing though, we have come a long way in society from 20 years ago when sexual assault awareness was nowhere near today's standards.
I just don't know.
People are less likely to file criminal charges for rape, especially when the perp is a very famous person. On the other hand, everyone and their dog can claim to have seen God and Aliens because there aren't really any repercussions.In the Atlantic? I read that piece. I generally agree with his articles.
If I come across as defending Cosby, it is because I put myself in my shoes and realize that somehow, 15 people accusing me of doing something is enough proof in the eye of the public that I am guilty, which is a terrifying thought. The US has a long, dark history of black men getting lynched because of hearsay. That is not to say that the women are lying. I just don't have enough evidence to say for sure that either side is right or wrong. Nowadays, it just takes one accuser (cf Woody Allen and Mia Farrow)
I could also ask how is it possible that Bill Cosby raped 15 women, and not one single case made it to a judge in criminal court. That proves nothing though, we have come a long way in society from 20 years ago when sexual assault awareness was nowhere near today's standards.
I just don't know.
I'm very, very uncomfortable with this idea that allegations are enough to discredit a public figure. Doesn't matter whether there were 100 people claiming that he raped each and every one of them. Apart from the fact that committing 99 crimes is not evidence that the 100th was committed by the same person... we don't base truth on how many people are saying it. How many people have independently claimed they have seen a UFO, or the Virgin Mary?
Shame that we will never know for sure whether Cosby is innocent or not. I'm not guessing.
Sounds like charges could follow to me. This "not dignifying" allegations with a response is very dodgy IMO
Sounds like charges could follow to me. This "not dignifying" allegations with a response is very dodgy IMO
Not defending Cosby here, but what else would you have him do? If he came out and denied it, people will just say he is lying.
Not sure what the statute of limitations is on rape in the various jurisdictions where the alleged crimes took place, but for the older accusations he probably can not be put on criminal trial. I am not sure if there is a time limit on brining a civil suit against him or not.
The statute of limitations for all of these seems to have expired. That said, one thing that can't be overlooked in the court of public opinion, is that its highly unlikely that 15 women spanning three decades are collectively lying.
Gotta save up for those legal fees and settlements.Doubt he will do them for much longer. He won't want to deal with getting heckled, especially at his age.
This is so depressing. Saville was a freaky character even when I was a kid. But Cosby? I loved that guy as a kid. Who didnt want to be in that family when they were young?
Next I'll find out Fozzie Bear is a sex pest.