KM
I’m afraid I just blue myself
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2008
- Messages
- 49,914
Voted United. Real answer is Barcelona 2011.
The Arsenal 98 team was better than the invincible team.How come the invincibles isnt in? Only team in England to not lose a Premier game and went 49 unbeaten overall.
Barca would dick them
Still think our 08 side is better than the 99 one.
They’d both lose to Liverpool 21/22. Force of nature.Manchester United 2007/08 would beat 1998/99
xG kingsThey’d both lose to Liverpool 21/22. Force of nature.
Well that's because you'd be taking possibly the greatest player ever out of one team and adding him to another - the fact that Barca had him, along some other incredible players is why they were so dominant.Barcelona
Though if you stick prime Lionel Messi into any of the others then it flips it for quite a few of them
Well that's because you'd be taking possibly the greatest player ever out of one team and adding him to another - the fact that Barca had him, along some other incredible players is why they were so dominant.
99 defence, Schmeical, Stam, Berg, Johnson, Irwin, May, Neville brothers.It was, 99 team were far weaker defensively, which was the main factor in them never coming close to repeating In Europe. 2006-11 was the best Utd ever in Europe in terms of consistency, and it was built off a strong defensive base. Also had a much stronger squad, this is not a knock on the 99 team, just the nature of how the game has changed to allow the top teams now to build ridiculously deep squads with the added benefit of weakening some of the competition by removing players as options for competing teams.. The Ronaldo Madrid years probably had the best squad of individuals ever with all the talent they had in their peak years. It is also why I am not that impressed with their achievements, you have peak Marcelo/Pepe/Ramos/Varane/Carvahal/Caseimero/Modric/Kroos/Benzema/Ronaldo/Bale all at the same time, just an absurdly unfair squad.
yeah I think we’re saying the same thing essentially: any already excellent team + Messi becomes an all time team. It’s like the Bulls with Jordan.The thing is though, the rest of them all had many great players (duh) but none of them had anyone as good as Messi (discounting Santos of course). The Messi factor is just too overpowering
How is Celtics leading the poll?
Well to elaborate on my Benfica claim the won the league and European cup double in 1960/61 while defending their European cup the season after and also winning their domestic cup.
They beat an amazing Barcelona side and while qn admittedly past it but still great Madrid side to do it as well.
They definitely need to be in there, they were sublime.
Did the Celtics forum/fans rig the vote?And the results are in...
I have no issue with that (Even though I voted AC Milan 88/89). Winning the European Cup with 11 players who were born within a 30 mile radius of Parkhead is an incredible achievement.
Plus my Mum/Grandparents lived across the street from Jimmy Johnstone and his wife (and went to school with them), so I'm delighted for this small acclaim... as rigged as it was.
Did the Celtics forum/fans rig the vote?
I mean they were great and all but not really up to par with the other candidates to be honest.
Perhaps too impartial at times, just for the sake of being so.I couldn't really give a definitive answer, but if I were to guess, I'd say yes
If Redcafe is much of a gauge on Manchester United fans (and i think it is), I'd say that we are a lot more impartial and less partisan than, let's say, Celtic fans. (Probably the same with Liverpool fans)
If it were a poll on the biggest achievement. The Celtic team would easily win it. But best team? I don't know. All of the teams on the shortlist were world class, though.
At the end of the day, it's all a bit of fun.
How is Celtics leading the poll?
That Torino side never really recovered from the crash.
Damn straight.Leicester 2015/16.
99 team were far weaker defensively, which was the main factor in them never coming close to repeating In Europe. 2006-11 was the best Utd ever in Europe in terms of consistency, and it was built off a strong defensive base. Also had a much stronger squad, this is not a knock on the 99 team, just the nature of how the game has changed to allow the top teams now to build ridiculously deep squads with the added benefit of weakening some of the competition by removing players as options for competing teams.. The Ronaldo Madrid years probably had the best squad of individuals ever with all the talent they had in their peak years. It is also why I am not that impressed with their achievements, you have peak Marcelo/Pepe/Ramos/Varane/Carvahal/Caseimero/Modric/Kroos/Benzema/Ronaldo/Bale all at the same time, just an absurdly unfair squad.
Considering all 3 08 forwards would be picked ahead of the 99 forwards, I find it hard to argue 99 had the better squad.99 defence, Schmeical, Stam, Berg, Johnson, Irwin, May, Neville brothers.
08 defence, EVS, Rio, Vidic, Evra, Brown, Evans, Silvestre, O’Shea
99 midfield , Giggs (prime) Jesper, Keane, Butt, Scholes (prime) Beckham, Jordi
08 midfield, Carrick, Hargreaves, Anderson, Nani, Giggs (aging) Scholes (aging) Park, Fletcher
99 forwards, Ole, Sherigham, Yorke, Cole
08 forwards, Tevez, Rooney, Ronaldo
Don’t think there was a big difference in the squad depth between 08 and 99. Some may argue 99 was a stronger squad.