He's been with us for 2 years
Thanks for correcting me.
He's been with us for 2 years
Type of appointment that was made because of 'vibez' and not credentials.
Based on what?It’s a bit embarrassing that we even signed him and tells a lot about our staff recruitment
Seems a bit negative for negatives sake to slag the bloke off seeing as none of us actually saw him doing his day to day job.
Based on his lack of credentials and bang average managerial and coaching careerBased on what?
We all seen it on the pitch though. Our attacking play was awful. Not saying it’s solely down to him though.Seems a bit negative for negatives sake to slag the bloke off seeing as none of us actually saw him doing his day to day job.
Based on his lack of credentials and bang average managerial and coaching career
Yeah this. It's amazing to see people defend him because we don't sit at Carrington all day. He's achieved nothing as a coach and has been the striker coach for a team that finished -2 GD.Based on his lack of credentials and bang average managerial and coaching career
-1 GD. But it's good that he has been held accountable for that.Yeah this. It's amazing to see people defend him because we don't sit at Carrington all day. He's achieved nothing as a coach and has been the striker coach for a team that finished -2 GD.
A side that scored more goals than Artetas Arsenal that finished 8th from a shitty XG. If anything it's showing his coaching on chance conversion is strong.Yeah this. It's amazing to see people defend him because we don't sit at Carrington all day. He's achieved nothing as a coach and has been the striker coach for a team that finished -2 GD.
We've only got 1 first team striker and he did as well as could hve been reasonably expected-1 GD. But it's good that he has been held accountable for that.
Hard to argue with that! I find it a bit weird for a coach (not a manager) to be so out of shape though.A side that scored more goals than Artetas Arsenal that finished 8th from a shitty XG. If anything it's showing his coaching on chance conversion is strong.
Hard to argue with that! I find it a bit weird for a coach (not a manager) to be so out of shape though.
Round is also a shape!
While it can't be conclusively proven that he was bad at his job our fecking embarrassing goal difference the past two seasons doesn't reflect well on him as a specialist attacking coach does it? Probably the right decision to get rid.
If INEOS didn’t want to renew his contract and let him go then what does this mean for ETH? He brought him in and it’s not fair to get rid of his back room team unless you’re getting rid of him. Are we gonna replace him with another attacking coach specialist?
We'll always have that couple of months when Rashford could head the ball.
If he wants to stay he'll accept Ineos' judgement on which members of his backroom staff are good enough to be here. A couple of top coaches added to his team could help him turn things around.If INEOS didn’t want to renew his contract and let him go then what does this mean for ETH? He brought him in and it’s not fair to get rid of his back room team unless you’re getting rid of him. Are we gonna replace him with another attacking coach specialist?
I agree. Aslong as like you said they do actually bring in top coaches. You can always tell if the teams coached proper by the way they play on the pitch.If he wants to stay he'll accept Ineos' judgement on which members of his backroom staff are good enough to be here. A couple of top coaches added to his team could help him turn things around.
I'm genuinely curious as to what credentials you're talking for a "forwards coaching" role (which I think is the official role with us?)? I'm not even sure other big clubs have this role, and if they do/did (like defence coach, GK coach etc.), then what are the credentials of those individuals?Based on his lack of credentials and bang average managerial and coaching career
Bennie talked about the two best trainers. Only two players were fully committed in training.
Dalot and Fernandes.
Of course he was talking a Portuguese media outlet, ZeroZero.
Every study ever made on management shows that the disciplinarian/stick approach never works in the long run. If that's your only approach as a manager then you're doomed to fail. I think what Benni is saying is true, and that's not an excuse for the players, it's a Ten Hag issue. If you think about peak Jose, he was pally with the players but absolutely ruthless when he needed to be, he got away with it because he was charming and charismatic, you didn't want to let him down. Ten Hag is none of those things.Clearly happy he was moved on!
ETH is a disciplinarian and obviously isn’t trying to be pally with the players, I have zero issues with that, there’s a huge playing staff if you need some hype men. It just seems like there’s always an excuse with our players.
Mourinho is (or better was) the master of the "we against the world" approach. Bad for you when he threw you out of this "we", but as long as you were part of it you were running through a brick wall for him.Every study ever made on management shows that the disciplinarian/stick approach never works in the long run. If that's your only approach as a manager then you're doomed to fail. I think what Benni is saying is true, and that's not an excuse for the players, it's a Ten Hag issue. If you think about peak Jose, he was pally with the players but absolutely ruthless when he needed to be, he got away with it because he was charming and charismatic, you didn't want to let him down. Ten Hag is none of those things.
Yep, I agree. I think peak Jose was the most impressive manager I've ever seen. His teams were machines. He would get results you thought were impossible.Mourinho is (or better was) the master of the "we against the world" approach. Bad for you when he threw you out of this "we", but as long as you were part of it you were running through a brick wall for him.