Zaphod2319
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2020
- Messages
- 4,355
- Supports
- Chelsea
Why do these threads get locked btw?
I think it is often for how hard the condemnation is for an alleged crime. Now with no bail, there has to be pretty solid charges.
Why do these threads get locked btw?
Did he? I swear I recall Allardyce saying he maintained his innocence with the club until pretty much the last minute.Sunderland continued to play Adam Johnson even after he admitted to the staff what he had done.
Being named is unusual.
Being locked up as well.
They must have a fairly strong case.
Part of his bail conditions for the first alleged crime were not to have house parties which he continued to do. He was then accused of sexually assaulting a 17 year old at one in January and raping someone else this week. His bail was rejected on the basis that he can’t be trusted not to (allegedly) offend again.
Unbelievable.Part of his bail conditions for the first alleged crime were not to have house parties which he continued to do. He was then accused of sexually assaulting a 17 year old at one in January and raping someone else this week. His bail was rejected on the basis that he can’t be trusted not to (allegedly) offend again.
Unbelievable.
Even before his case his heard, surely City have grounds to sack him. What kind of home does this guy come from? How can one be this irresponsible?
Why do these threads get locked btw?
I think it is often for how hard the condemnation is for an alleged crime. Now with no bail, there has to be pretty solid charges.
Why do these threads get locked btw?
I suppose I would find the presumption of innocence to be a poor excuse though considering he was out on bail?
Doesn't work like that.
I had a family member who was suspended from their job pending investigation into a rape allegation. His estranged wife basically decided to try to ruin his life, when he told his employer what had happened he got told it was company policy to suspend him until the outcome.
Needless to say the case was dropped due to no evidence found of any wrongdoing (after 6 months) and he got his job back.
But each company will be different, but generally it seems to be common practice.
Them keeping him locked up until the trial is unusual for "stars".
Being named is unusual.
Being locked up as well.
They must have a fairly strong case.
You can be named in the UK when charged.
Not unusual to be refused bail either especially if he's breached it previously and committed other offences.
Why do these threads get locked btw?
Not being a rapist but violating his bail conditions.On being shit, yes.
On being an alleged rapist? Probably not.
Not being a rapist but violating his bail conditions.
And he‘d better get used to it, if found guilty.What a surprise, a man who normally lives in the lap of luxury finds 48 hours in prison to be a bit of a culture shock. I think that's the point of prison.
If he has committed another offence, if being the word, then he will be considered a danger to women. So jail is the best place for him.Being named is unusual.
Being locked up as well.
They must have a fairly strong case.
You're out on bail, you're lucky to still be able to work. The least you can do is lay low, keep your head down and do your job. But no, he's still throwing parties.Yep agreed
Wait what? There was a new incident in last week as well? I thought they were charges from the past
Yeah it's messed up. One of the alleged offences occured in the past week. It beggars belief.
Let he who hasn’t organised a gangbang during lockdown cast the first stone.So he was arrested three times and City still allowed him to be a part of the team. It's absolutely sickening and I have no idea what's been happening at the club for months now. Also how they handled Walker's actions during first lockdown etc. They always claim how they study characters of potential signings but it seems like they're trying to add some of the most stupid, childish cretins of the football world now.
So he was arrested three times and City still allowed him to be a part of the team. It's absolutely sickening and I have no idea what's been happening at the club for months now. Also how they handled Walker's actions during first lockdown etc. They always claim how they study characters of potential signings but it seems like they're trying to add some of the most stupid, childish cretins of the football world now.
He was arrested in November, then July and now this week, I think. And he always stayed in the team.he was still playing after being arrested the first time
not three times
For anyone interested
Not to defend dickheads who think because they have money and status every girl wants to sleep with them, but I'm sure there's a fair share of women looking for some quick "shut up and go away" cash also, so maybe it's fairly common? Not many footballers get done for this in the end which probably says a lot about the justice system and it's view on rape/sexual assault more than anything...Seems kind of crazy that he has been playing for city recently, who I presume know all about this. Innocent until proven guilty is important but why risk it for a shit fullback with half a knee?
Usually when cases are still being investigated and people can’t be named. I think The Caf can get into trouble if someone “accidentally” names that person so they rightly get locked and a big warning is announced on the homepage. However, after someone has been charged they can be named so maybe it’s something like that. Maybe a mod can clarify.Why do these threads get locked btw?
The details of his bail hearing are in the article below:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...ndy-footballer-remanded-in-custody-on-charges
Stables said Mendy was willing to transfer £50,000 immediately to the court as security if he was granted bail, as well as surrendering to “what might best be described as house arrest” with a lengthy curfew and electronic tag.
Definition of a corrupt judiciary system
Why do these threads get locked btw?
I don't think he's going to be too bothered about that if HM's Government is going to be looking after him for the next few decades.
What? They said they were willing to pay 50k immediately if they were granted bail. That's 50k of whatever the bail is set as, not a bribe.
For anyone interested
My post was unecessary provocative.
Serious question: what happens if they can't pay 50k?
What? They said they were willing to pay 50k immediately if they were granted bail. That's 50k of whatever the bail is set as, not a bribe.