Behind the Curtain | Eastern European draft | The winner: Skizzo

:lol:

ronaldo-fat.jpg
In fairness, that's a charity match. When paid you expect him to be fitter.

1283149633_740215_0000000001_noticia_normal.jpg
 
He was balloon as well except the entire air went inside his head.
Mmmm... my backup was Romario.

You are onto something here: Brazilians end up like balloons unless the air goes to their head.
 
I am actually amazed Downcast did not improve his RB situation, as tasty as Bozsik & Hidegkuti picks are.

I definitely think he made the right choice. I don't there is any RB in the pool that would be perceived as a match 1v1 for Džajić. So think the better strategy was to get the best possible players and force the opponent to respond to a stronger offense. plus Puskas, Hidegkuti and Bozsik in the quarter finals is just :drool:
 
I definitely think he made the right choice. I don't there is any RB in the pool that would be perceived as a match 1v1 for Džajić. So think the better strategy was to get the best possible players and force the opponent to respond to a stronger offense. plus Puskas, Hidegkuti and Bozsik in the quarter finals is just :drool:
Dzodzuashvili has a proven record against him :wenger:
 
Match schedule

Tuesday 31st -
skizzo vs Pat_Mustard
Enigma vs Gio (Theon)

Wednesday 1st -

Thursday 2nd -
green_smiley vs Downcast

Friday 3rd -

Saturday 4th -

Sunday 5th -

Monday 6th -
 
Squads for the quarter finals:

Downcast (Anders Emil Våge)
1. F. Puskás 2. B. Zebec 3. G. Popescu 4. B. Vukas 5. C. Dinu 6. D. Kipiani 7. I. Balaci 8. A. Panenka 9. I. Chislenko 10. J. Tomaszewski 11. Y. Voynov 12. T. Crnković 13. J. Bozsik 14. N. Hidegkuti
Moby 1. M. Sammer 2. E. Streltsov 3. D. Stojković 4. K. Balakov 5. R. Jarni 6. D. Srna 7. M. Klose 8. A. Shalamanov 9. G. Grosics 10. N. Subotić 11. H. Kasperczak 12. I. Dumitru 13. S. Kocsis 14. I. Netto
green_smiley 1. D. Džajić 2. Z. Boban 3. R. Lewandowski 4. N. Dobrin 5. B. Ivanović 6. I. Tudor 7. J. Katalinski 8. M. Fazlagić 9. M. Lăcătuș 10. B. Stelea 11. A. Žanetić 12. R. Rat 13. G. Lato 14. F. Jusufi
Skizzo 1. P. Nedved 2. K. Deyna 3. J. Popluhár 4. V. Jugović 5. A. Kanchelskis 6. K. Urbanczyk 7. N. Matić 8. Z. Anczok 9. J. Gorgoń 10. D. Georgescu 11. M. Soskic 12. D. Berbatov 13. N. Vidic 14. A. Shevchenko
Raees 1. J. Masopust 2. A. Shesternyov 3. A. Demyanenko 4. B. Stanković 5. O. Nejedlý 6. E. Wilimowski 7. R. Dasaev 8. G. Asparuhov 9. V. Ivanov 10. K. Pesek 11. M. Ivkovic 12. M. Manolov 13. V. Vasovic 14. F. Albert
Enigma_87 1. L. Kubala 2. L. Modrić 3. D. Šuker 4. M. Belodedici 5. J. Zakariás 6. L. Novák 7. R. Dzodzuashvili 8. R. Gadocha 9. A. Mostovoi 10. E. Rudakov 11. V. Kaplitchnyi 12. A. Arshavin 13. Z. Boniek 14. M. Khurtsilava
Pat_Mustard 1. Z. Czibor 2. G. Sárosi 3. W. Zmuda 4. V. Kolotov 5. H. Mkhitaryan 6. Y. Letchkov 7. A. Szymanowski 8. A. Konkov 9. P. Mijatovic 10. J. Croy 11. V. Khidiyatullin 12. L. Buryak 13. G. Hagi 14. I. Šurjak
Gio (Theon) 1. O. Blokhin 2. V. Voronin 3. V. Bezsonov (Bessonov) 4. D. Šekularac 5. E. Lovchev 6. W. Lubanski 7. W. Weber 8. A. Zavarov 9. I. Viktor 10. I. Belanov 11. A Bashashkin 12. S. Metreveli 13. H. Stoichkov 14. S. Pluskal
 
Just noticed Weber in Gio's XI. I understand why he's technically eligible, of course, but for me this is where «spirit of the draft» should trump technicalities.

Going with place of birth alone, not demanding an actual connection, is too risky. You end up with Laudrup style absurdities at worst.
 
Just noticed Weber in Gio's XI. I understand why he's technically eligible, of course, but for me this is where «spirit of the draft» should trump technicalities.

Going with place of birth alone, not demanding an actual connection, is too risky. You end up with Laudrup style absurdities at worst.
On one hand I'm proud of that pick from a loophole perspective, the sort of thing @antohan would lap up. But on the other, you're absolutely right and he never should have been eligible. When setting the rules, we all underestimated the number of overlaps. And when searching for a central defender, it became quite exasperating when the great Oleg Kuznetsov was ruled out (born in Eastern Germany, but only played for USSR) and then Dragan Holcer (born in a fecking concentration camp on the border and was back in Serbia a few months later). And it's a shame the likes of Bican missed out, just the sort of player who should have been showcased here. Benefit of hindsight and all that.
 
When setting the rules, we all underestimated the number of overlaps. And when searching for a central defender, it became quite exasperating when the great Oleg Kuznetsov was ruled out

Aye, and during the Euros draft he was classified as a German which didn't help his cause at all as we were only allowed 2 picks per nationality and Kuzetsov wasn't exactly amongst the better picks of the draft despite having a great tournament in '88. As much as I like the nationality rule, there are cases when an exception has to be made, perhaps the draftmaster/ and a neutral draft committee could be allowed to wield such power in future drafts.
 
On one hand I'm proud of that pick from a loophole perspective, the sort of thing @antohan would lap up. But on the other, you're absolutely right and he never should have been eligible. When setting the rules, we all underestimated the number of overlaps. And when searching for a central defender, it became quite exasperating when the great Oleg Kuznetsov was ruled out (born in Eastern Germany, but only played for USSR) and then Dragan Holcer (born in a fecking concentration camp on the border and was back in Serbia a few months later). And it's a shame the likes of Bican missed out, just the sort of player who should have been showcased here. Benefit of hindsight and all that.

I think he is a fair pick. I mean there are rules and if he's within it I have no problem with that. Wouldn't pick him myself as indeed he's not in the spirit of the draft, but I have no complaints for you guys picking him. Each to his own.

Probably @Joga Bonito suggestion is the best for future drafts. The likes of Prosinecki, Kuznetsov and Bican missing out is by far more sad than you guys picking Weber.
 
Aye, and during the Euros draft he was classified as a German which didn't help his cause at all as we were only allowed 2 picks per nationality and Kuzetsov wasn't exactly amongst the better picks of the draft despite having a great tournament in '88. As much as I like the nationality rule, there are cases when an exception has to be made, perhaps the draftmaster/ and a neutral draft committee could be allowed to wield such power in future drafts.

Agreed. Common sense needs to prevail.
 
On one hand I'm proud of that pick from a loophole perspective, the sort of thing @antohan would lap up. But on the other, you're absolutely right and he never should have been eligible. When setting the rules, we all underestimated the number of overlaps. And when searching for a central defender, it became quite exasperating when the great Oleg Kuznetsov was ruled out (born in Eastern Germany, but only played for USSR) and then Dragan Holcer (born in a fecking concentration camp on the border and was back in Serbia a few months later). And it's a shame the likes of Bican missed out, just the sort of player who should have been showcased here. Benefit of hindsight and all that.

Aside from jealousy that I didn't notice him first, I fecking loved that pick. Its a real shame that the likes of Prosinecki and Holcer couldn't appear, but the odd sneaky pick like Weber just spices things up for me, and its a fair reward for great research.
 
Yeah, I suppose the problem is that there will always be something - but for me the question has to be whether the draft is one where loopholes have a natural place or not. In some sort of criteria themed affair - absolutely. In a regional draft - not so much.

I think it worked fairly well in the SA draft, but we had some borderline/grey area cases there too - which is hard to avoid. But I think the point - if there is one - is that you can't operate with absolute rules in a regional draft unless those rules are ridiculously detailed and complex. So, what you go for is a basic rule - but with exceptions in accordance with the spirit of the thing, etc.

No big deal, of course - from what I've seen this draft has been excellent on the whole. But it's a shame that some fine players have been ruled out on a technicality, especially when you consider that an EE draft would've been the most natural stage for them to properly shine on.
 
As much as I like the nationality rule, there are cases when an exception has to be made, perhaps the draftmaster/ and a neutral draft committee could be allowed to wield such power in future drafts.
Yes, but it'll require a great amount of researching for them as this kind of committee has to feature before the beginning of the draft, imo. Still, a good idea
 
Yes, but it'll require a great amount of researching for them as this kind of committee has to feature before the beginning of the draft, imo. Still, a good idea

I wouldn't say they need to research the players in question before-hand but deal with these cases then and there (whenever they are picked that is) or if and when they brought up in the PMs. It's way too hard to research and get through all the debatable players in the pool before the draft starts.
 
I wouldn't say they need to research the players in question before-hand but deal with these cases then and there (whenever they are picked that is) or if and when they brought up in the PMs. It's way too hard to research and get through all the debatable players in the pool before the draft starts.
Never liked the idea of changing the rules or even clarifying them during the game, a manager should be able to plan his team even before the actual drafting begins, imo.
 
On one hand I'm proud of that pick from a loophole perspective, the sort of thing @antohan would lap up. But on the other, you're absolutely right and he never should have been eligible. When setting the rules, we all underestimated the number of overlaps. And when searching for a central defender, it became quite exasperating when the great Oleg Kuznetsov was ruled out (born in Eastern Germany, but only played for USSR) and then Dragan Holcer (born in a fecking concentration camp on the border and was back in Serbia a few months later). And it's a shame the likes of Bican missed out, just the sort of player who should have been showcased here. Benefit of hindsight and all that.
Agreed. It's not that much I exploit loopholes but find hidden gems/golden nugget research rewards to be quite fun in general. It's a pity the cut off criteria here seems to have been more counterproductive than beneficial.
 
@Moby Doesn't look like i'm going to be free till Sunday mate. Is that alright with you?
 
Cool with me. United's play so not that ideal tho.

Yep, I'll try and get something in for Saturday evening perhaps.. but truth is I'll probably need all of Saturday to find some time to do some write ups.
 
Nándor Hidegkuti


18681120_117526576341.jpg


Individual Accomplishments:

1954 FIFA World Cup All-Stars Team
Hungarian Football Federation Player of the Year: 1953
MTK Hungary Greatest Player of all time
Voted 6th in Greatest Hungarian Footballers poll

Team Accomplishments:

Olympic Champion: 1952
World Cup Runner-up: 1954
Central European Champion: 1953
Hungarian League champion: 1951, 1953, 1958
Hungarian Cup: 1952
Mitropa Cup: 1955

Profile

Hidegkuti is considered to be one of the greatest proponents of the receding forward position as a False 9, and also the biggest inspiration behind the modern #10 role. One of the great attackers in 'The Mighty Magyars' Hungarian golden team during the early 1950s, He scored twice on his debut for the national team, and two years later, he made his second international appearance and scored a hat-trick against Bulgaria. In 1953, Hidegkuti scored a hat-trick for Hungary when they beat England 6-3 at Wembley Stadium. Playing from deep, Hidegkuti was able to distribute the ball to the other four attackers and cause considerable confusion in the English defense. This was an innovation at the time and revolutionized the way the game was played. It's widely claimed that for all the attention that the strikers Puskás and Kocsis received during the Hungarian Golden Team, it was always inside forward Hidegkuti that was the puppetmaster. It was a simple but brilliant move that allowed him to prosper: he simply played further back as the game progressed. Perhaps he would have been held in greater light if not for the fact that he was half a decade to a decade older than most of his team-mates, and never quite hit his peak at the same time as them given his advancing age, and never got to play in the bigger leagues of Europe.



Profile submitted by @Šjor Bepo
 
József Bozsik was born in Kispest in 1925, now a district of Budapest. Given the nickname 'Cucu' by his grandmother, grew up playing football on the local football grounds in Kispest with his best friend and neighbour Ferenc Puskás. As an 11-year-old, he attracted the attention of KAC and the club signed him to the youth team.

In 1943, he made his debut for the first team against Vasas SC. He made his debut for Hungary at the age of 22 against Bulgaria on August 17, 1947 and went on to win 101 caps and score 11 goals between then and his final cap on April 18, 1962 against Uruguay. Bozsik won the Olympic title with his country in 1952 in Helsinki and finished second with the Hungarian team in the 1954 FIFA World Cup. He also took part in Hungary's famous 6-3 win over England at Wembley and the team's 7-1 win over England in Budapest. In 1956-57, Bozsik returned from Honvéd's winter tour to play in the 1958 FIFA World Cup. A year later, he won the Mitropa Cup with Honvéd. In all, he played 447 top-level games for KAC (and its legal successor BHSE) and scored 33 goals.

In his prime, Bozsik was considered the best attacking half-back in the world. He was known for his flawless technique, flair, tactical nous, passing accuracy and creativity. He was often used as a deep lying playmaker where his tackling ability was also helpful. Though the likes of Puskas, and Kocsics grabbed the headlines, it was Bozsik that was recognised as the teams chief dynamo.

Throughout his career, Bozsik won many honours and was even made a Member of Parliament. After his retirement, he became a member of the board at his old club. He also managed the team for 47 matches between January 1966 and September 1967, after which he returned to his position on the board. In 1974, he was chosen to manage the Hungarian national team, but illness forced him to resign soon after he got the job. József Bozsik died in Budapest at the age of 52 due to cardiac dysfunction (Heart failure). He became a posthumous freeman of Kispest.

Goal vs England


Goal vs Uruguay



Style of play




 
HUNGARY - THE GOLDEN TEAM OF THE 1950S


sUhsBMR.png
eucSYDg.jpg


HUNGARY 1954 WORLD CUP FINALIST - From left to right: Puskás, Grosics, Lóránt, Hidegkuti, Buzánszky, Lantos, Zakariás, Czibor, Bozsik, Budai and Kocsis.


The Golden Team (Hungarian: Aranycsapat; also known as the Mighty Magyars, the Marvellous Magyars, the Magnificent Magyars, or the Magical Magyars) refers to the Hungary national football team of the 1950s. It is associated with several notable matches, including the "Match of the Century" against England in 1953, and the quarter-final ("Battle of Berne") against Brazil, semi-final (against Uruguay) and final ("Miracle of Bern") of the 1954 FIFA World Cup. The team inflicted notable defeats on then-footballing world powers England, Uruguay and the Soviet Union, before the 1956 Hungarian Revolution caused the breakup of the side.

Between 1950 and 1956, the team recorded 42 victories, 7 draws and just one defeat, in the 1954 World Cup final against West Germany. Under the Elo rating system they achieved the second highest rating recorded by a national side (2166 points, June 1954), behind only Germany (2200 points, 13 July 2014).


220px-Aranycsapat.png
The famous 2-3-3-2 formation employed by the side

The team is generally credited for successfully implementing an early form of "Total Football", later used by the Dutch in the 1970s. Perhaps his most revolutionary idea was that every player should be able to play in all positions; previously, each player in a team was assigned a specific position or role, usually marking a specific opposition player. The Hungarian tactic of players constantly changing roles and positions contributed greatly to the success of the team – however, it could only be introduced by using a core set of talented players who were used to playing together at both a club and national level for a period of time

The team is also generally recognized for introducing new coaching and tactical innovations, which were subsequently adopted throughout the game.
It was also considered emblematic of Hungarian national success and the most important subject of national pride in the worst period of oppression by the communist regime imposed on Hungary by the Soviet Union that occupied the country in 1945. In this period any "nationalistic" or even patriotic expression was strongly disapproved since these were considered being against both the internationalist ideal of the communist government as well as the expected behavior of the Hungarian nation defeated in World War II. In this atmosphere, international sport events were the only tolerated fields of expression of national pride.

1952 Olympic Games (Yugoslavia vs. Hungary) ---> Puskas, Hidegkuti, Bozsik, Zebec, Vukas and Crnkovic on the pitch

The Hungarians arrived at the 1952 Summer Olympics unbeaten for two years. The team easily defeated opponents in the preliminary rounds, before meeting the 1948 defending Olympic champions, Sweden, in the semi-finals. Hungary demolished Sweden 6–0 to set up a final against Yugoslavia. Goals from Ferenc Puskás and Zoltán Czibor ensured a 2–0 victory and the Olympic gold for Hungary.

1953 Central European Championship (Italy vs. Hungary)

In 1953 Hungary took part in the Central European International Cup, a nations cup for teams from Central Europe and the forerunner of the European championship. The competing teams included Austria, Czechoslovakia, Italy and Switzerland. Hungary eased their way to a final against Italy, which they won 3–0 with a goal from Nándor Hidegkuti and two from Puskás.


1953 "Match of the Century" (England vs. Hungary)

A friendly match was arranged for 25 November 1953 against England. England had never been defeated on home soil by a team from outside the British Isles (it lost to the Republic of Ireland in 1949), and the FA were complacent – as the inventors of the game, they were assured that their players were technically and tactically superior to any other countries. At the time, England were ranked as the 3rd best team in the world; Hungary were ranked as the best team in the world. The game was eagerly anticipated; the British Press reported it as "the Match of the Century".

The game was played in front of 105,000 in Wembley Stadium. Hungary simply demolished England; they scored in the first minute, and after 27 minutes they were 4–1 up. The final score was 6–3, with a hat-trick from Hidegkuti, two goals from Puskás and one from Bozsik. It was a footballing lesson that sent shockwaves through English football, and which ultimately caused English clubs to adopt continental coaching and tactics.

500px-Golden_Team_1953.jpg


The Golden Team in 1953
front row: Mihály Lantos, Ferenc Puskás, Gyula Grosics
back row: Gyula Lóránt, Jenő Buzánszky, Nándor Hidegkuti, Sándor Kocsis, József Zakariás, Zoltán Czibor, József Bozsik, László Budai


1954 Hungary 7 England 1

England were anxious for revenge after the defeat at Wembley, and a return match was scheduled in Budapest for 23 May 1954, three weeks before the start of the 1954 World Cup. Any hopes that the Wembley game had been an aberration were immediately dispelled as Hungary tore England apart; Hungary won 7–1, inflicting England's heaviest ever defeat.

1954 World Cup First Round Games

Hungary went to the 1954 World Cup in Switzerland as firm favourites; they were unbeaten since 1950, and had issued served notice of their ability with 6–3 and 7–1 thrashings of England.

The 16 finalists were assigned to four groups, with each group having four teams in it. Each group contained two seeded teams and two unseeded teams. Only four matches were scheduled for each group, each pitting a seeded team against an unseeded team (this contrasts with a conventional round-robin in which every team plays every other team, which would have resulted in six matches in each group). In a further oddity, extra time would be played if the teams were level after ninety minutes in the group games, with the result being a draw if the scores were still level after 120 minutes.

The top two teams from each group would qualify for the quarter finals. Hungary shared Group B with Turkey, West Germany and South Korea; Hungary and Turkey were the two seeded sides in the group.

Hungary won their opening game against South Korea 9–0, with Kocsis scoring a hat-trick. In the second game, Hungary thrashed West Germany 8–3, with Kocsis scoring another 4 goals; however, cynical fouling on Puskás left him with a hairline fracture of the ankle which left him unavailable for selection for the quarter final and semi final stages.

1954 World Cup Quarter Final: "Battle of Berne" (Brazil vs. Hungary 1954)

Hungary met Brazil in an eagerly anticipated quarter final; both sides had a reputation for open, attacking football. The Brazilians had lost the 1950 World Cup final to Uruguay, and were anxious to reach the final again.

Unfortunately, the game was notable for the number of cynical fouls performed by both sides rather than as an exhibition of footballing technique; Hungary took a 2–0 lead after 7 minutes, and after that the game descended into a series of fouls, free kicks and fights on the pitch resulting in three dismissals. The game ended 4–2 to Hungary. Fighting continued off the pitch in the tunnels and in the players dressing rooms.

The game's English referee Arthur Ellis commented: "I thought it was going to be the greatest game I'd ever see. I was on top of the world. Whether politics and religion had something to do with it I don't know, but they behaved like animals. It was a disgrace. It was a horrible match. In today's climate so many players would have been sent off the game would have been abandoned. My only thought was that I was determined to finish it."


1954 World Cup Semi Final (Uruguay vs. Hungary)

Uruguay were the defending champions, and had never lost a World Cup match in their history, winning both tournaments they had previously entered.


Hungary were without Puskás, but still managed to take the lead via Zoltán Czibor. Uruguay rallied but were unable to even the scores before half-time. Almost immediately after the restart, Nándor Hidegkuti scored a second goal for Hungary. Uruguay's unbeaten World Cup record seemed to be over, but they still had most of the second half to recover.

The champions were not going to give up without a fight, and spent much of the remainder of the match launching attack after attack at the Hungarian defence. With a quarter of an hour to play Hohberg scored for Uruguay; Hungary defended desperately until the 86th minute, when Hohberg scored his second to force extra time.

Appearing to have much more energy than their opponents, Hungary retook the lead midway through the second period of extra-time when Sándor Kocsis headed home from close range; Kocsis scored again four minutes from injury time. Uruguay were beaten 4–2, their first ever World Cup loss, while Hungary went on to their second World Cup final.

The game was in direct contrast to the quarter final between Hungary and Brazil; both Hungary and Uruguay had played attractive, attacking football in what was arguably one of the finest displays of football in a World Cup.


1954 World Cup Final: "The Miracle of Bern" (West Germany vs. Hungary)---> Puskas played despite being injured

The final was between Hungary and West Germany – the team ranked 1st in the world against a collection of amateurs that did not yet have a true national league of their own. Hungary were in their second World Cup Final (their 1938 team had lost to Italy 4–2 in Paris); in addition, they had a record of 34 wins, 6 draws, and 1 defeat since August 1949, and were unbeaten in their last 31 matches. Hungary had beaten West Germany 8–3 in a first round game. The only issue the Hungarians faced was the ankle injury sustained to Puskás in the same game, from which he had not fully recovered – Sebes still took the decision to play him.

Hungary took an early lead in the 6th minute, with a goal from Puskás. Two minutes later, Czibor made it 2–0 to Hungary. However, the Germans rallied, and swiftly pulled the score back to 2–1 through Max Morlock. In the 18th minute, the Germans drew level from a corner kick; the goal was scored by Helmut Rahn.

In the second half, Hungary poured forward looking to retake the lead, but their attempts were repeatedly foiled by the German defence, with goalkeeper Toni Turek pulling off several fine saves.

With six minutes left and the score still 2–2, Helmut Rahn scored West Germany's third goal. Two minutes before the end, Puskás appeared to equalise, but he was ruled off-side. The match ended Hungary's unbeaten run in one of the biggest upsets in the history of football; a team of amateurs had beaten the world's highest ranked team 3–2 in the "Miracle of Bern".

There were three controversial incidents in the final, each favouring the Germans; Hungarian goalkeeper Grosics was allegedly obstructed for the second German goal, Puskás apparently equalised in the 89th minute but was deemed to be offside, and there was an alleged foul on Kocsis in the penalty area in the final minute of the game.


1955 Scotland 2 Hungary 4

On 8 December 1954, Scotland hosted Hungary at Hampden Park in a friendly match, before a crowd of 113,000.[5] Scotland were determined not to be humiliated as England had been a year earlier, and attempted to take the game to the Hungarians in a display of counterattacking football. This made for an open, attractive game with plenty of goals; Hungary scored on 20 minutes through Bozsik, and Hidegkuti made it 2–0 six minutes later. Scotland rallied and pulled one back on 36 minutes through Tommy Ring, but Sandor made it 3–1 to Hungary just before halftime.

The second half continued in the same vein, with Partick Thistle winger John Mackenzie constantly beating Hungary full back Mihály Lantos. Bobby Johnstone scored a second goal for Scotland on 46 minutes, and only poor finishing prevented Scotland from equalising. The home side continued to press forward, but were caught on a counter break right at the end of the match when Kocsis scored to make the final score 2–4 to Hungary. It was the closest any team had come to beating Hungary in a friendly competition since 1950. Afterwards, Puskas complimented the excellent work of Mackenzie, stating that he had "never seen wing play of such a high standard".


1956 Soviet Union 0 Hungary 1

On 23 September 1956, the Soviet Union played Hungary in a friendly game at the Lenin Central Stadium in Moscow, before a crowd of 102,000. The Soviet Union were unbeaten at home, and were generally regarded as the natural successors to the Hungarians as the world's premier footballing side. In addition, the Soviet team and players were regarded as ideals of socialist principles by senior communist authorities, who expected the Soviet Union to win comfortably, as befitting the senior member of the Eastern Bloc. However, a single goal from Zoltán Czibor ended the Soviet Union's unbeaten home record; the result did little to encourage good relations between the two countries, and was a minor contributing factor to a wave of patriotic fervour that resulted in the Hungarian Revolution of 1956.