DomesticTadpole
Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
We could do with a nice long summer.LVG will extend this summer.
We could do with a nice long summer.LVG will extend this summer.
LVG will extend this summer.
José Mourinho to #mufc is done regardless of what happens. He will not join this season but in the summer [via @davidamoyal, di marzio]
I tend to agree with this. Pochettino is simply a risk we cannot afford at the moment due to the prior weak managerial appointments who have simply failed to bring this club forward. Mourinho makes the most sense, whether we like it or not. A proven winner is needed now to re-establish this club as a serious contender for the league and in Europe. United found themselves in the comfort zone managerial wise, considering Ferguson wasn't going anywhere and was one of the best managers the game has ever witnessed, consistently winning trophies for over a decade. Liverpool, Chelsea, City, all top teams have been forced to adapt and quickly act when it comes to appointing a new manager as no success was guaranteed. They simply have a lot more experience than we do, when it comes to this.The love in for Pochettino confuses me.
This is a manager who was fired at Espanyol with a 30% win rate, left Southampton with a 35% win rate and at Spurs, with decent resources, and at a time where United, Chelsea and Liverpool are as weak as they've ever been (and City/Arsenal are hardly setting records), he's only keeping pace with the leaders.
United have tried a manager who looked solid with less resources. He didn't work. If we're going to look to smaller clubs for managers, they need to have been successful like Fergie was at Aberdeen or José was at Porto.
Pochettino has never won a trophy. Anywhere. He's being overrated this year, not because he's good, but because the top sides are so bad.
Di Marzio is reliable as it gets.Either of those names credible?
The love in for Pochettino confuses me.
This is a manager who was fired at Espanyol with a 30% win rate, left Southampton with a 35% win rate and at Spurs, with decent resources, and at a time where United, Chelsea and Liverpool are as weak as they've ever been (and City/Arsenal are hardly setting records), he's only keeping pace with the leaders.
United have tried a manager who looked solid with less resources. He didn't work. If we're going to look to smaller clubs for managers, they need to have been successful like Fergie was at Aberdeen or José was at Porto.
Pochettino has never won a trophy. Anywhere. He's being overrated this year, not because he's good, but because the top sides are so bad.
Longevity means little when a manager is working with a revolver near his head and ordered to deliver trophies on a year in year out basis. We're talking here about clubs capable of sacking managers whom, few months before, had won league and even CL titles. The only time Mourinho could develop youths (and to be fair he failed) was at Porto. However he did a magnificent job there working under a restricted budget. Also at Porto his aim was to win quickly and move somewhere else.
I don't feel that I can qualify myself as an expert about the man. However I do remember something about him during his time in Italy which impressed me. However before I can share it I have to give an idea of what Mourinho was in Italy. The man was considered a god there, someone who defied gravity by putting Manchester United of the iconic SAF in difficulty. He was full of confidence as his team was cruising to a historical treble despite losing up club favourite Ibra. His confrontational approach, his confidence and his mind games was nothing short from scandalous and infectious for the Italians who were used to the usual 'bow the head' to the football's padrinos and the people loved him for it as so many managers who had never experienced mind games fell to it miserably.
I remember this particular tv programme called il Chiambretti night. Chiambretti is quite controversial and self centered himself (he's got a programme called for him) and tend to invite people who are similar to him in a 1 to 1 meeting were he would explore their lives, their thoughts etc. Jose was spectacular in that program, a great show man oozing confidence from every direction. However when Chiambretti asked him about his record with youths all his confidence vanished and he suddenly became sad. He claimed that there was more to be done on this regard and that he would work hard to develop some of the Inter youths including Balotelli and Santon. He could have easily bypassed that question by saying that the only thing that truly matters is success. He was Inter's manager after all, a club who broke up with AC Milan because they wanted to buy shiny foreign talent, however he went into details and was quite emotional about it.
As you well know Mourinho didn't stayed long at Inter. Balotelli turned out to be a lazy cnut and Santon's picked a number of injuries which basically ruined him. However that interview convinced me that if the guy signs with a proper club than he will do his outmost to improve his record in this regard.
Sir Bobby has done lots for this club but appreciation of those things shouldn't give him veto power on decisions that have major implications on the future of the club nor should what he and Fergie did give them the right yo treat our managerial post as a lab for experimenting on which British manager to try out. That doesn't mean they should be barred from giving input on these things but it's frustrating to see Fergie going against all the standards he set for his own coaches when he was at the helm, his coaching teams were full of highly qualified and rated coaches but due to an all consuming need to hoist Giggs to the post all of this no longer matter?Also survived the Munich crash and helped lead the club back to greatness. But yeah, the Moyes thing cancels it all out.... Love your input.
To be fair i think some of them, eg AVB, only get paid severance until they find another job.$$$$$$$$
Its the easiest payout. Get a 3-4 year contract, get sacked after a year and go home with a huge severance package.
This is true. As a comparison Spurs 51 points after 26 games and where it would have put them in previous years:The love in for Pochettino confuses me.
This is a manager who was fired at Espanyol with a 30% win rate, left Southampton with a 35% win rate and at Spurs, with decent resources, and at a time where United, Chelsea and Liverpool are as weak as they've ever been (and City/Arsenal are hardly setting records), he's only keeping pace with the leaders.
United have tried a manager who looked solid with less resources. He didn't work. If we're going to look to smaller clubs for managers, they need to have been successful like Fergie was at Aberdeen or José was at Porto.
Pochettino has never won a trophy. Anywhere. He's being overrated this year, not because he's good, but because the top sides are so bad.
I know these are shite newspapers etc and don't if you've all seen these already? (sorry haven't had time to look through threads)
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...th-as-board-lose-faith-in-Louis-van-Gaal.html
http://metro.co.uk/2016/02/15/jose-...-united-boss-by-the-end-of-the-month-5682351/
In the Sun article they say that the club pays attention to social media and fans polls or something? Think anyone at the club having a peak at the Caf?
Edit - not that I believe it - but imagine Jose rocking up at that Arsenal clash - Wenger would be delighted
We should be used to this, it's happened before with Gundogan etc. Can't see it happening now.the first pages seemed so hopeful, as the story all broke on the BBC late one Friday night.
Absolutely nothing since!
the first pages seemed so hopeful, as the story all broke on the BBC late one Friday night.
Absolutely nothing since!
I know these are shite newspapers etc and don't if you've all seen these already? (sorry haven't had time to look through threads)
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...th-as-board-lose-faith-in-Louis-van-Gaal.html
http://metro.co.uk/2016/02/15/jose-...-united-boss-by-the-end-of-the-month-5682351/
In the Sun article they say that the club pays attention to social media and fans polls or something? Think anyone at the club having a peak at the Caf?
Edit - not that I believe it - but imagine Jose rocking up at that Arsenal clash - Wenger would be delighted
We should be used to this, it's happened before with Gundogan etc. Can't see it happening now.
Sir Bobby has done lots for this club but appreciation of those things shouldn't give him veto power on decisions that have major implications on the future of the club nor should what he and Fergie did give them the right yo treat our managerial post as a lab for experimenting on which British manager to try out. That doesn't mean they should be barred from giving input on these things but it's frustrating to see Fergie going against all the standards he set for his own coaches when he was at the helm, his coaching teams were full of highly qualified and rated coaches but due to an all consuming need to hoist Giggs to the post all of this no longer matter?
There's absolutely no chance Mourinho is contractually restricted from taking another PL job this season. None at all. feckwittery is the only possible explanation.
Nah - you can have a clause in your contract for that. There's usually a certain time period involved - though it can't be unreasonable. He would also be going to a fellow 'competitor' in the same industry etc etc - can be done for sure. Not saying it's the case here, but certainly not against the law, as long as the content is not unreasonable.Totally. It sounds bizarre. Imagine being sacked from your job, and then being told you also can't go and do another job in the area you live, and you would have to emigrate if you want more paid employment. Surely it would against some sort of employment law.
Mourinho wasn't my first option however I can't blame him too much on what happened at Chelsea. It's not easy to live under that sort of pressure especially when all things start going wrong. LvG has more experience in that and he's trembling under it. Also I refuse to believe that Maureen wasn't back stabbed by his players That's quite tough to take
The devil is in the detail, he wasn't sacked (officially) he left 'by mutual consent', which is lawyer talk for "we'll pay you off but some contractual agreements will stand".Totally. It sounds bizarre. Imagine being sacked from your job, and then being told you also can't go and do another job in the area you live, and you would have to emigrate if you want more paid employment. Surely it would against some sort of employment law.
Well the last part is conjecture. But what we do know is all the things that he did live on television. He's not squeaky clean and I couldn't convincingly argue with anyone that he's not going to bring that here, even though I do think he should get a chance at the job here.
Whenever I debate this with anyone, that's the one part where the argument falls apart. He's a loose cannon and nobody can be convinced that he'd change his ways here.
Loose cannon like throwing slippers and tables to players or threatening to throw a tea cup to a 6.3ft Danish giant?
These are emotional people who are born winners and hate losing. Yes Maureen would lose it if he is losing especially when he's being backstabbed
It's the second job in a row where he's supposedly been backstabbed, and third in total if you count his 1st Chelsea spell.
Either he's the unluckiest man around, he's an utter cnut who pushes his players over the edge or the players backstabbing him in an excuse for his methods tiring.
Neither is a good sign.
At porto he was a god, at Chelsea (1st time) he left after winning the title, at inter he was God once again, at real he didn't too shabbily considering he was wanted back at Chelsea he immediately won the league and then there was this freaky season. All the teams he managed either wanted him back or would sell their soul to have him back
At Chelsea he left after a shocking start to the season both times, the latest more so.
At Real Madrid he did an average job and ended up being forced out due to falling out with the entire dressing room in the end.
No debate over Inter and Porto, but it's undeniable that he has a track record of falling out with his players and that's not a good thing at all.
Seems pretty clear to me, mourinho doesn't want to join a sinking ship, he wants a fresh start in the summer with his own transfers. Not worth it for him to risk damaging his reputation any further if he doesn't secure the CL.
Makes sense why we didn't spend anything in January either, saving it all for him.
This is true. As a comparison Spurs 51 points after 26 games and where it would have put them in previous years:
11/12 - 3rd - 12 off 1st
12/13 - 3rd - 14 off 1st
13/14 - 5th - 6 off 1st
14/15 - 3rd - 9 off 1st
He might be the real deal or he might just be flavour of the month like Rodgers, Martinez, Laudrup and others were in the past.
The love in for Pochettino confuses me.
This is a manager who was fired at Espanyol with a 30% win rate, left Southampton with a 35% win rate and at Spurs, with decent resources, and at a time where United, Chelsea and Liverpool are as weak as they've ever been (and City/Arsenal are hardly setting records), he's only keeping pace with the leaders.
United have tried a manager who looked solid with less resources. He didn't work. If we're going to look to smaller clubs for managers, they need to have been successful like Fergie was at Aberdeen or José was at Porto.
Pochettino has never won a trophy. Anywhere. He's being overrated this year, not because he's good, but because the top sides are so bad.