Melville Red
New Member
Watch the video. He was more annoyed about that too!
Watch the video. He was more annoyed about that too!
Looking at some of the comments here, one of United's more underrated players too.Might be the most underrated striker in Premier League history. Probably because he wasn't here long enough to reach 100 goals, but still.
I felt RVN success was contributed hugely by Beckham's assists.
I didn't say he wasn't a good player, quite the opposite. But i just never took to him. I have absolutely no emotional connection to him as a former united player. Thats what i mean by nothing player to me. I never ever think about him. When i see his name pop up i think "oh yeah he played for us" and thats it.
Oh yeah, that guy. Scored 150 goals in 219 games for us at an insane rate - the fastest for anyone who scored over 100 goals for United (also fastest for anyone who scored 50+).
In my life time of supporting United, I've never seen a better "goal scorer" than RvN. Also, you need to research what the phrase "nothing player" actually means.
Wah wah wah. Someone else has a different opinion to you. Oh noes.
Incredibly underrated when we talk about strikers of last decade.
Also, I wonder where people stand on RvN v Kane debate? Who’s the better player?
It's not that your opinion differs from mine. You called him a "nothing player". That's bullshit.
I felt RVN success was contributed hugely by Beckham's assists.
Lovely article.I absolutely worshipped this guy,he was my first football hero...
But after that incident especially his failed penalty, he didn't look like the same again until we finally were able to beat arsenal and he scored the penalty at the game. That was what I feel at that timeThe best finisher the league has ever seen. The article sums it up, when he was through on the keeper you could relax. You just knew.
I disagree his career is defined by that Arsenal game. Nobody but a few bitter Arsenal fans give a shit about that, everyone else remembers what a brilliant player he was.
We looked a better team after he left but I think that was in part down to Ronnie becoming a better decision maker rather than Saha being better than Ruud.
I didn't say he wasn't a good player, quite the opposite. But i just never took to him. I have absolutely no emotional connection to him as a former united player. Thats what i mean by nothing player to me. I never ever think about him. When i see his name pop up i think "oh yeah he played for us" and thats it.
Wasn't there in 2006/07 when we played arguably our best football of the decade.Rooney and Ronaldo also matured and peaked after Ruud left. Having Tevez also helped.
In 2008 we had several world class players who were either not around when Ruud was or were not the finished product yet. And Chelsea and Arsenal were much weaker then a few years before.
Never really warmed to Ruud. He was a great goalscorer and all but I felt he was limited outside of that, especially when you compared him to Henry. Also, felt he would leave us at some point for another team. Don't know why. I was about 15 at the time though so my opinions were based purely on emotion and not a lot else.
As a kid, I don't think I appreciated his off the ball intelligence and just how much of a handful he was for defenders. I think I only really became aware of that when we signed Chicharito and I watched his off the ball movement.No problem with you not warming to him, but from a grown-up-at-the-time viewpoint I want to argue a few of these points. For one, Ruud was not a solo runner or long distance shooter like for instance Henry, but he certainly had as good a tool belt outside the box as, say, Dwight Yorke. He was technical, intelligent, efficient and a fighter, and he used it so he was good at holding up the ball, playing the right people in, building up play and making space for himself as well as for others.
Secondly, although he has said it was a choice to go to Madrid, I thinknit’s pretty clear it was a result of him falling in favour in Ferguson’s view. He did lose q step through injury, and Ferguson wanted him to play second fiddle to young Ronaldo and eventually Rooney, which didn’t make the best of RVN’s strengths, whereas Beckham and Solskjær did. If it was up to Ruud, I think he would have played at United til he was 32.
In many ways, he was like Yorke and Cole rolled into one.
Wasn't there in 2006/07 when we played arguably our best football of the decade.
I do think that getting away from having a centre-forward who usually contributed little to the build-up play helped. For counter-attacking, always a great strength of Fergie's best United sides, Saha (and then Tévez) was far more suited than Van Nistelrooy.
Not sure what qualifies as "peak" - one might argue we've only seen peak Ronaldo at Real Madrid. But Rooney and Ronaldo were both excellent in 06/07 and yet in the previous season, with Van Nistelrooy, it wasn't "amazing", or even close to it really.I don’t agree with this, as RvN contributed as much to the build up play as did Tevez and Saha. RvN had a big ego (as did Tevez, if not Saha), but he was very conscious of his need of his co-players to be able to shine. He was also technically very proficient and conscious of team play. Which is why he struggled with young Ronaldo, who at that time wasn’t.
He was also fairly quick before his last round of injuries, and intelligent innhis runs. Peak RVN playing with peak Ronaldo and peak Rooney would be amazing if you ask me.
As a kid, I don't think I appreciated his off the ball intelligence and just how much of a handful he was for defenders. I think I only really became aware of that when we signed Chicharito and I watched his off the ball movement.
RVN was an enigma in many ways. I remember thinking he looked clumsy and awkward most of the time but still seemed to be elegant with the ball at his feet, didn't make any sense, as he appeared as though he was galloping most of the time instead of running. I remember I took particular annoyance at United during this time as well because I felt we were too over reliant on him having a good game and scoring, which frustrated me as I felt as though we had a better team than RVN + 10.
Anyway, you're definitely right about how good of a player he was, he's just never been one of my favourites or would even get in my top 3 strikers list, mostly through no fault of his own.
Not sure what qualifies as "peak" - one might argue we've only seen peak Ronaldo at Real Madrid. But Rooney and Ronaldo were both excellent in 06/07 and yet in the previous season, with Van Nistelrooy, it wasn't "amazing", or even close to it really.
I don’t recall seeing Eric play. I would have been around 8 in his final season.You don’t remember Eric then do you? Now in the modern game (PL onwards), he is my favourite player, the player that reignited Utd and got us playing and winning again. In the modern era no other player comes close.
Last 15 to 20 years. His peak was not in the last decade.
Also, rvn was a bit of a nothing player for me at united. I never think of him, or have any real memories. My two lasting memories are that we improved when he left and his little strop in the league cup final.
Not saying he wasn't an awesome striker but just someone i never took to at all.
And as for being better than henry. Not close. Henry wins. (Ruud has only a slightly better goals per game ratio and nowhere near as much of a creative influence).
My word
I think most people will agree with you now, it was just a big debate at the time because both were scoring a lot of goals, playing for rival sides.I feel Ruud is a bit overrated at your side of the pond. The comparison to Henry isn't even a topic here. Henry is in a completely different league if you ask me. Ruud was a great goalscorer, that's it.
At least, that's what I (we Dutch feckers) think of him.