Oh wait, so you think you know how Bayern operates? Here's the inside scoop for you, since you know so much about finances...
The professional Bayern team is part of the Bayern Munich AG (think Incorporated). The AG has sold 25%. 75% is held by.... Bayern München e.V., the original club. Guess who the owner of that club is? Yes, just like Barca, it's a traditional 100% member owned club. So when you make comparisons like that, inform yourself. Cos it's not like you make it out to be.
I never said debt is bad. I said Barca's debt is massively excessive and not sustainable unless they are propped up artificially. Rangers went bust for a lot less problems. The stadium in Munich? Cost them a chunk, but they paid it off. In full. On their own. Barca's stadium is grand, but it's much older. Why is it still on the books as debt? It should've been paid off a long time ago. And the upgrades they are doing shouldn't explain a debt of 700 million Euros. Heck, you could build two Camp Nous with 700 million Euros...
I didn't say we're great because we sold 25% of the AG. I didn't even say we're great. I said Barca should have its professional license revoked until they can get their finances in check. Or go bust like the Rangers did. They have no place in the first league. And sure, it'll be a loss for football, but honestly football isn't a game of crooks cheating their way through finances. Other teams came and went, we'll survive Barca not boing in the first league for a while. Football survived Juve being relegated, Rangers being relegated.
Barca ISN'T paying for the debt themselves. That's the whole point. They're just not paying off the debt. They're only piling on more debt. What is it with some people not understanding that while "debt as investment" is good, "any debt, even unsustainable debt" is bloody stupid and should be avoided. Which sick mind came up with the idea that going into debt for the sake of being in debt is in any way a smart business decision? You can do numbers, can't you?