dublin said:
Indeed.
Ban The Word "discuss"
- Thread starter Dublin
- Start date
Indeed.
Dublin should concentrate on his school-work, not words that annoy him on RedCafe.net.dublin said:Does my head in ; e.g. Lampard is crap discuss.
school when the teacher would give us our exam paper.
Discuss.
blythy said:
Oh alright, I'll d****** it. I've left school now and as I have already stated if I get my profile back I promise I will never get annoyed with words on the Cafe again, I do, I do, I do.
"The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you."
Ezekiel 25:17
What do these words actually mean? Should they be uttered everytime before you're about to kill somebody?
Discuss
Ezekiel 25:17
What do these words actually mean? Should they be uttered everytime before you're about to kill somebody?
Discuss
If you have the time, yes. why not?
What come first?
Discuss...
Discuss...
TheRedFlag said:
That was written to make samuel L jackson sound like the coolest motherfecker in the world.
discuss
Chicken and egg debate unscrambled
Egg came first, 'eggsperts' agree
)
The question has baffled scientists through the ages.
LONDON, England -- It's a question that has baffled scientists, academics and pub bores through the ages: What came first, the chicken or the egg?
Now a team made up of a geneticist, *********** and chicken farmer claim to have found an answer. It was the egg.
Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.
Therefore the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg.
Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, told the UK Press Association the pecking order was clear.
The living organism inside the eggshell would have had the same DNA as the chicken it would develop into, he said.
"Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg," he added. "So, I would conclude that the egg came first."
The same conclusion was reached by his fellow "eggsperts" Professor David Papineau, of King's College London, and poultry farmer Charles Bourns.
Mr Papineau, an expert in the philosophy of science, agreed that the first chicken came from an egg and that proves there were chicken eggs before chickens.
He told PA people were mistaken if they argued that the mutant egg belonged to the "non-chicken" bird parents.
"I would argue it is a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it," he said.
"If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg."
Bourns, chairman of trade body Great British Chicken, said he was also firmly in the pro-egg camp.
He said: "Eggs were around long before the first chicken arrived. Of course, they may not have been chicken eggs as we see them today, but they were eggs."
The debate, which may come as a relief to those with argumentative relatives, was organized by Disney to promote the release of the film "Chicken Little" on DVD. So there.
Egg came first, 'eggsperts' agree
)
The question has baffled scientists through the ages.
LONDON, England -- It's a question that has baffled scientists, academics and pub bores through the ages: What came first, the chicken or the egg?
Now a team made up of a geneticist, *********** and chicken farmer claim to have found an answer. It was the egg.
Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.
Therefore the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg.
Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, told the UK Press Association the pecking order was clear.
The living organism inside the eggshell would have had the same DNA as the chicken it would develop into, he said.
"Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg," he added. "So, I would conclude that the egg came first."
The same conclusion was reached by his fellow "eggsperts" Professor David Papineau, of King's College London, and poultry farmer Charles Bourns.
Mr Papineau, an expert in the philosophy of science, agreed that the first chicken came from an egg and that proves there were chicken eggs before chickens.
He told PA people were mistaken if they argued that the mutant egg belonged to the "non-chicken" bird parents.
"I would argue it is a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it," he said.
"If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg."
Bourns, chairman of trade body Great British Chicken, said he was also firmly in the pro-egg camp.
He said: "Eggs were around long before the first chicken arrived. Of course, they may not have been chicken eggs as we see them today, but they were eggs."
The debate, which may come as a relief to those with argumentative relatives, was organized by Disney to promote the release of the film "Chicken Little" on DVD. So there.
dublin said:
You should be delighted to have an amusing tagline Dublin.
I've been posting on here for 5 years now (some of my posts have even been vaguely readable) and I still don't have a decent tagline.
I think there should be a competition to choose me a decent tagline... and preferably one that doesn't use the word 'cnut'
(cue hundreds of cnut based suggestions!)
I've been posting on here for 5 years now (some of my posts have even been vaguely readable) and I still don't have a decent tagline.
I think there should be a competition to choose me a decent tagline... and preferably one that doesn't use the word 'cnut'
(cue hundreds of cnut based suggestions!)
Roy Smithers said:
samuel l jackson is the coolest motherfecker in the world, motherfecker.
GaryLifo said:You should be delighted to have an amusing tagline Dublin.
I've been posting on here for 5 years now (some of my posts have even been vaguely readable) and I still don't have a decent tagline.
I think there should be a competition to choose me a decent tagline... and preferably one that doesn't use the word 'cnut'
(cue hundreds of cnut based suggestions!)
How about 'cnut'.
Do it Weaste...
MUFCTheReligion said:
a fine suggestion... but if it must be offensive... something a little bit more original would be better.
dosnt get worse then my tagline.........they even changed my username to sheep.
Sheep7!!!! said:
Mine doesn't reflect perfectly at all with my persona.
I have a gigantic flagpole.