Yep.Haaland or Messi
It's a given
I think Haaland is a given. I've been wrong before. Countless of timesHaaland? I dunno. Bookies favour Messi, but as far as a striker goes Haaland had a near perfect season. Also i think there is Messi fatigue with him winning it.
Haaland's team is shite though. Best player? Haaland. Most prestigious? MessiMessi showed up in the most important final he has ever played, Haaland didn't in any of the finals he played.
Messi should take it.
Haaland's team is shite though. Best player? Haaland. Most prestigious? Messi
Manchester United forum advocating for a City player to win the Ballon d'Or. Jesus wept.
Manchester United forum advocating for a City player to win the Ballon d'Or. Jesus wept.
Manchester United forum advocating for a City player to win the Ballon d'Or. Jesus wept.
He had an impactful tournament and a fitting culimination for his international career, but I really wouldn't rank Messi's performances in 2022 anywhere near a top 3 of all time at the World Cup.Almost feels a bit wrong Messi getting it for achievements that are almost a year old but if you're to judge it historically, he had arguably a top 3 World Cup in history and any player in history that was eligible that had as good a World Cup as he did would 100% get the award.
Haaland will probably be second then and third will be between De Bruyne and Mbappé for the same reasons - CL vs a distant memory World Cup.
Except that Haaland was anonymous at the business end of the season. Gundogan, Rodri, De Bruyne and Dias were more important players for City's success than Haaland in the end if we're being honest. Performances in the biggest games is part of being one of the greatest, M'bappe and Messi showed up big time in the World Cup and were plenty productive aside from that.Haaland has been the best player on the planet over the last 12 months which is what the award should be based on. Not a 4-weeks tournament even though that tournament is the biggest around. The Golden Ball has been awarded to recognize achievement in that tournament.
Yeah, but that was in the fifth best league in Europe. If he gets it, it's the world cup that does it.It's not only the World Cup, but Messi also had a really good season with PSG in terms of end product. It's just that it shows itself up in the form of goals and assists, not just goals. I think it's because Messi's domestic season wasn't as good as it was in his prime, but for any normal player it would be their best season ever. Granted there was like a small period where Messi wasn't performing well for PSG.
The World Cup puts him over the top and it's the main argument. But it's important to put into context that he just didn't perform well over that month and that was that.Yeah, but that was in the fifth best league in Europe. If he gets it, it's the world cup that does it.
He had an impactful tournament and a fitting culimination for his international career, but I really wouldn't rank Messi's performances in 2022 anywhere near a top 3 of all time at the World Cup.
That’s not even remotely close to the truth.Almost feels a bit wrong Messi getting it for achievements that are almost a year old but if you're to judge it historically, he had arguably a top 3 World Cup in history and any player in history that was eligible that had as good a World Cup as he did would 100% get the award.
Haaland will probably be second then and third will be between De Bruyne and Mbappé for the same reasons - CL vs a distant memory World Cup.
I don't think it's that outlandish to suggest it.
You could argue it. If not top 3, I think top 5 is fairly appropriate. Hard to think of 5 WC campaigns that were clearly better.