Loublaze
ATLien
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2009
- Messages
- 16,593
He's 26 and not an improvement, no thanks.
Better than his countryman Fellaini
He's 26 and not an improvement, no thanks.
What's up with Enzo Perez? He hasn't moved anywhere, has he?
Where did he play for Benfica? Was he a DM?Witsel is a very nice player. If United can get him on cheap because of Zenit's financial woes, it would be a nice option. Benfica fans were pretty upset when he left. He was more impressive than Matic, Javi Garcia and probably on par with Enzo Perez, if we compare their respective Benfica careers.
Where did he play for Benfica? Was he a DM?
I was reading a Dutch football forum and saw some people from Belgium claiming he is 'world class', 'far better than Fellaini', 'he is just as good as Matic' and 'Real Madrid and Barcelona wanted him before he signed for Zenith'.
I dont know the player that good because Russia is a bit off radar but is there any truth in comments made by the Belgium people?
What are Blind, Fellaini and Herrera then?Average player, no thanks.
Only eight games actually, but okay..yes in his Standard Liege days. I dont know how many games he got suspended, i think half a season or something like that.
I'd prefer the other Belgian CM we were linked with today.
Only eight games actually, but okay..
I'm surprised he's so underrated here. You would do well with a guy like him in midfield.
Yeah but you can't say 'meh, average player' like a lot of people here just because he plays in Russia, I doubt many of you have seen him play for Zenit. Neither have I but he's been class and very consistent for our national team.It's because hes been playing in Russia, you're right he is a good player, very good one at Benfica, but haven't really tracked his progress since that move to Russia so would be a gamble.
What are Blind, Fellaini and Herrera then?
At Zenit, he's been pretty average, I'll give you that but no worse than Fellaini has been for us so far. Russia is also a wasteland when it comes to football talent. Wasn't Willian at Anzhi before signing for Chelsea? And for Belgium, all of their players bar a select few underperform so you can forgive him for doing the same.Herrera and Fellaini are ok midfielder with performances ranging from average to good, Blind is better than all of them despite being a much different player. I've seen many games from Witsel at Zenit, Benfica and Belgium so I don't think I am judging him too harshly.
De Bruyne is more of an attacking mid tbh, good player but not actually a CM.
At Zenit, he's been pretty average, I'll give you that but no worse than Fellaini has been for us so far. Russia is also a wasteland when it comes to football talent. Wasn't Willian at Anzhi before signing for Chelsea? And for Belgium, all of their players bar a select few underperform so you can forgive him for doing the same.
At Benfica though, he was as good as Matic was, perhaps even better. He's a very good player and to call him average after admitting to watching him there is a bit strange. He's a talent, that's for sure and is better than Fellaini and perhaps even Carrick.
I really like Blind but he really isn't that great a player compared to Witsel. If Witsel is average, then so is Blind.
It is my opinion, if it's strange to you then so be it. When I judge Blind in comparison to him, I take into account his important versatility too.
Blind is the best DM on the books. Carrick should be a CB full time in the 3-5-2 and on the bench when it's 4 at the back. There's every chance he's better than Shaw at wing back as well because he's a better passer. He was very good there at the World Cup.That could also be a 'problem' though. Is he better than Shaw at left (wing) back? No. Is he good enough to be a central defender in a 3-5-2? Meh. Is he better than say Carrick or Witsel at DM? Not for me. Versatility is important in a squad that had to deal with as many injuries as United but I'd rather have a player that excels in one position.
That could also be a 'problem' though. Is he better than Shaw at left (wing) back? No. Is he good enough to be a central defender in a 3-5-2? Meh. Is he better than say Carrick or Witsel at DM? Not for me. Versatility is important in a squad that had to deal with as many injuries as United but I'd rather have a player that excels in one position.
Blind is the best DM on the books. Carrick should be a CB full time in the 3-5-2 and on the bench when it's 4 at the back. There's every chance he's better than Shaw at wing back as well because he's a better passer. He was very good there at the World Cup.
Okay then, I don't rate him that highly, probably because I've seen him play a lot for Ajax and he never stood out in their team for me. His WC performances surprised me but I still think he's not good enough to be a starter for United.I'd say he's better LWB than Shaw despite the lack of pace and definitely better than Witsel in midfield.
I think Willian was at Shaktar wasn't he?At Zenit, he's been pretty average, I'll give you that but no worse than Fellaini has been for us so far. Russia is also a wasteland when it comes to football talent. Wasn't Willian at Anzhi before signing for Chelsea? And for Belgium, all of their players bar a select few underperform so you can forgive him for doing the same.
At Benfica though, he was as good as Matic was, perhaps even better. He's a very good player and to call him average after admitting to watching him there is a bit strange. He's a talent, that's for sure and is better than Fellaini and perhaps even Carrick.
I really like Blind but he really isn't that great a player compared to Witsel. If Witsel is average, then so is Blind.
I think Willian was at Shaktar wasn't he?
I think Willian was at Shaktar wasn't he?
Yes.