Adisa
likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
He needs to find a club where he can develop. Loans here and there are doing him no good.
Look at that again. You need a run of games. In one position. Settled. Not playing 4 different positions and normally only coming on to replace an injured player or when we're parking the bus in the dying minutes.
It looked like Ole’s plan, 2 years ago, was to let Axel play the easier cup matches at the start of the season to get some flow, then if he was good enough, get occasional PL games to compete with Victor for the starting CB position. However injuries got in the way and we never got to see if he was good enough.Look at that again. You need a run of games. In one position. Settled. Not playing 4 different positions and normally only coming on to replace an injured player or when we're parking the bus in the dying minutes.
Like I said earlier, at the start of the 2019-2020 season he looked like he had moved in front of Bailly and Jones, was being hyped up by Ole and expectations were high. Then injured pretty much the whole season. Once he got fit again, you'd have expected him to get a proper chance, but that's quite tricky if Ole has completely settled on Lindelof and Maguire. Of course, for a player his age, lacking that experience he absolutely has to play to develop.
That performance in Istanbul is not on any one player. That would be extremely harsh. The whole team played like an amateur side (which is not being harsh). I think it's fair to say that Ole has been quite conservative and frequently under (at least externally) pressure, so he's played safe pretty much always. That's afforded a lot less game time to Tuanzebe, with really only Greenwood getting minutes as a youngster, whereas Williams got in through having no left back to field when Shaw was injured and Rojo presumably injured as well. I don't say this to bash Ole, just to say that Tuanzebe has not been given enough of a chance for him to be adequately judged on here. That seems completely obvious to me.
edit: I'd also add that for a young centre back to get game time, he needs to be playing alongside an experienced centre back who guides him. That most definitely is not Lindelof, and it is even less Bailly. Of his 6 starts as a centre back he played in a back 3 without Maguire in Paris, next to Maguire against Basaksehir away, next to Lindelof at home to Granada, next to Maguire against Sheffield, next to Bailly against Leicester and against Watford. He had two starts in a back 4 with Maguire last season (Sheffield and Basaksehir) but that sample size is tiny and take a better look at the lineup against Basaksehir:
--------------Henderson
Shaw-Tuanzebe-Maguire-AWB
-----------Matic--------VDB
Mata---------Bruno-------Rashford
----------------Martial
Pretty shoddy midfield and if you look at the two goals conceded the first was from our corner, having a left back take the corner and AWB way up there too, with rapidly-ageing Matic as the last line of defense. The second goal is pretty much a collective defensive collapse.
Against Sheffield United:
---------------Henderson
AWB--Tuanzebe--Maguire--Telles
------------Matic------Pogba
Greenwood--Bruno----Rashford
-----------------Martial
The first goal conceded (from a corner) can be attributed to Tuanzebe not winning a header, but if you analyse it, Telles steps in front of him at the last minute as if challenging for the ball, Tuanzebe backtracks to get a head on the ball as Bryan who was marking Henderson beats him to it. Looks like that's zonal marking there. The second goal which was a collective defensive collapse has one free player in our box with AWB, Telles, Bruno and Tuanzebe all culpable.
For him to be given a chance, in my view, would be to get 5-6 games on the trot next to Maguire. At least. People kept talking about Henderson needing chances to prove himself. Well, he got plenty. Had some not so good games, and some good games. And that's an even more precarious position.
Spot on. For any other position than CB or goalkeeper we can throw in a player here and there, but for a CB it is not possible.That's never going to happen in the first team of a big club. Players go on loan for a run of games as he did at Villa, when they come back they need to perform immediately in the opportunities they get. That will be the odd cup game or sub appearance.
In the first team we have to play our best players every game. That's Maguire and Lindelof. Occasionally we play Bailly because when he's fit and on it, he is as good as them. There is not room to give some kid 5 or 10 consecutive games to see if he's good enough.
I was expecting to come in here with a bunch of a praise and the worst comments being like: "it's only preseason, doesn't tell you much".
Am I the only one that saw him play really well? Especially keeping in mind the lad next to him had a stinker.
Anyway, happy to see him go out on loan. Guy has all the attributes to make it. Hopefully he'll come back as our 3rd CB, ahead of Lindelof and Bailly.
The "we wouldn't sign Varane" argument is nonsense. Does us signing Sancho mean Rashford and Greenwood aren't good enough?I think he has remained an enigma because hes never been fit enough/good enough to get a run of games for everyone to see his level isn't good enough.
theres times he has been fit and unable to displace lindelof which means he isnt any good because otherwise we would partner him with HM not sign Varane etc.
he’s 24 in November. He isnt a youth prospect to develop he should already be playing at a good level. Look at the likes of Dias, Upamecano, Konate, Pau Torres who are similar age. He’s nowhere near their level and never will be. Just get shot of him while we can get a few bob for him.
The "we wouldn't sign Varane" argument is nonsense. Does us signing Sancho mean Rashford and Greenwood aren't good enough?
The players you mentioned aren't from the academy of one of the biggest clubs in the world. They were all starters at lesser teams. I think a better comparison would be someone like Ake.
I think Ole rates him quite a bit, or else he wouldn't have tried throwing him in that Sheffield game when others were fit. Taking into account all his performances, I really don't see a gap between him and Lindelof/Bailly. Just that the pair is "proven" and he's not. Axel has all the attributes for a top defender, with the exception of experience.
Sheffield aside, he did well whenever he did a get chance. Looked a bit shaky next to Bailly against Wolves. Not surprising, they don't complement each other and well, it's Bailly. He had a better performance than Lindelof against Fullham.
I think he'll surprise us a quite a bit, (on loan and after) despite his age. So let's just wait and see. There's not much to discuss when the lad barely plays, except his really good preseason performances, which everyone in this thread is failing to notice, except @Gopher Brown
I still think he’s a good player, but he needs to play every single week. He’ll be of little use as a backup centre half for us. Defenders more than any other position, need to play to build experience.
I was expecting to come in here with a bunch of a praise and the worst comments being like: "it's only preseason, doesn't tell you much".
Am I the only one that saw him play really well? Especially keeping in mind the lad next to him had a stinker.
Anyway, happy to see him go out on loan. Guy has all the attributes to make it. Hopefully he'll come back as our 3rd CB, ahead of Lindelof and Bailly.
He’s not going to get a run of games on the trot. If he couldn’t get them when Maguire was partnered by Lindelof he’s not going to get them if we buy Varane.
Good point. I don’t see Bailly or him wanting to stick around too long playing 2nd fiddle. Wouldn’t be surprised to see one or both sold/traded IF we bring in Varane AND KoundeHe couldn’t even get them when Lindelöf was out of favour, he still needs to get ahead of Bailly before trying to usurp Lindelöf. He’s currently 4th choice, and by the end of this week, could well be 5th choice.
Should be a good move for Tuanzebe. He needs regular minutes and there shouldn't be too much competition for him to contend with at Newcastle. You'd imagine Bruce would do a good job of looking after him too.
Not sure what Tuanzebe's contract situation is like atm but a successful loan spell plus potential sale next year would be good for all parties.
Rinse and repeat. Family club.
A loan is the right move for him this season. He's a talented and intelligent lad with good leadership qualities but if Ole favours Bailly as his second backup CB, then he's just going to be treading water. Looking at him in the pre-season games, he needs regular playing time with a reasonably regular partnership.
Pointless loan, won't get games ahead of Mings, Konsa or Cash. Would've been better off going to Newcastle.
Will he actually get regular games? They’ve got a very well-established and effective defence which seems like it wouldn’t need to rotate regularly.
I can appreciate it’s a familiar environment for Tuanzebe but it’s consistent minutes he’s in desperate need of at this point, not being another depth option. Newcastle would make more sense imo.
Thats where we need to think of the players development more, clubs aren't always going to pay the loan fee and give regular game time to youngsters. There has to be give and take from the club, it could very well be another year of Axels development handled very poorly by the club.Newcastle wouldn't pay the loan fee apparently because I agree much bigger chance of him getting starts there