Turnbull PM with Bishop as deputy.
But is it right for MPs to take it upon themselves to decide who the PM is anytime they like?Abbott was cnut so its good to see him go
Well it has happened quite a lot so far but the ruud to julia and the julia to rudd was not liked by people but this one has support of the publicBut is it right for MPs to take it upon themselves to decide who the PM is anytime they like?
I am not Autralian or do I know much about politics over there. I want to know, are Australians happy that there so many coups and back stabbing? The party MPs are essentially taking the power from the people to elect their own Prime minister. What do Australians think about it?
But is it right for MPs to take it upon themselves to decide who the PM is anytime they like?
Shorten really needs to go.Fun though it is to see the evil bastard get the comeuppance he so deserves it might well mean that the Libs can make a comeback. Shorten can no longer simply rely on not being Tony Abbott in the way that Tony Abbott won the last election by not being Julia Gillard or Kevin Rudd (ably assisted by the massed ranks of the right wing press) and I'm far from convinced that he is up for the job.
When you put it that way...long live the spill!Last pm to serve a full term was johnny Howard 11 years ago. feck
Does Australia not do elections any more?
When you put it that way...long live the spill!
Really though.
Imagine having the choice of a preening Hillsong wowser and a likeness of Franco carved into a potato.
That woman protesting is a bit ironic.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c79n20r750po
Her ancestors were sent there by the British justice system, or emigrated there. Those people then proceeded to oppress and discriminate against the indigenous population.
The monarchy is actually her's, whether she likes it or not.
What kind of comment is this?That woman protesting is a bit ironic.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c79n20r750po
Her ancestors were sent there by the British justice system, or emigrated there. Those people then proceeded to oppress and discriminate against the indigenous population.
The monarchy is actually her's, whether she likes it or not.
What utter nonsense Colin. She is Indigenous and there has never been a treaty, so why on earth should she accept the English Monarchy, who are only in charge because of a colonial invasion? And you can't discount the Crown's responsibility for the treatment of indigenous people over the years just because Charlie boy didn't personally shoot anyone. Thorpe is a bit erratic at times but often she has a point (like in this case) even if her strident nature confronts my (annoyingly very British) sense of decorum.That woman protesting is a bit ironic.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c79n20r750po
Her ancestors were sent there by the British justice system, or emigrated there. Those people then proceeded to oppress and discriminate against the indigenous population.
The monarchy is actually her's, whether she likes it or not.
The monarchy is actually her's, whether she likes it or not.